Service Path Attribution Networks (SPANs): Spatially Quantifying the Flow of Ecosystem Services from Landscapes to People
Ecosystem services are the effects on human well-being of the flow of benefits from ecosystems to people over given extents of space and time. The Service Path Attribution Network (span) model provides a spatial framework for quantifying these flows, providing a new means of estimating these economic benefits. This approach discovers dependencies between provision and usage endpoints, spatial competition among users for scarce resources, and landscape effects on ecosystem service flows. Particularly novel is the model’s ability to identify the relative density of these flows throughout landscapes and to determine which areas are affected by upstream flow depletion. span descriptions have been developed for a number of services(aesthetic viewsheds, proximity to open space, carbon sequestration, flood mitigation, nutrient cycling, and avoided sedimentation/deposition), which vary in scale of effect, mechanism of provision and use, and type of flow. Results using real world data are shown for the US Puget Sound region.
Keywordsecosystem services ecosystem service assessment span model service path attribution network environmental planning service flows flow modeling flow density flow criticality
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
- 1.Bagstad, K.J., Johnson, G.W., Villa, F., Krivov, S., Ceroni, M.: From ecosystems to people: Characterizing and mapping the beneficiaries of ecosystem services. Ecological Economics (in review)Google Scholar
- 2.Bourassa, S.C., Hoesli, M., Sun, J.: What’s in a view? Environment and Planning A(36), 1427–1450 (2004)Google Scholar
- 5.Daily, G.C.: Nature’s services: Societal dependence on natural ecosystems. Island Press, Washington (1997)Google Scholar
- 10.Millennium Ecosystem Assessment (MA). Millennium Ecosystem Assessment: Living beyond our means - Natural assets and human well-being. Washington, D.C., World Resources Institute (2005)Google Scholar
- 11.National Research Council (NRC). Valuing ecosystem services: toward better environmental decision-making. National Academies Press: Washington, DC (2005)Google Scholar
- 12.Nelson, E., Mendoza, G., Regetz, J., Polasky, S., Tallis, H., Cameron, D.R., Chan, K.M.A., Daily, G.C., Goldstein, J., Kareiva, P.M., Lonsdorf, E., Naidoo, R., Ricketts, T.H., Shaw, M.R.: Modeling multiple ecosystem services, biodiversity conservation, commodity production, and tradeoffs at landscape scales. Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment 7(1), 4–11 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 16.Villa, F., Ceroni, M., Bagstad, K., Johnson, G., Krivov, S.: ARIES (artificial intelligence for ecosystem services): A new tool for ecosystem services assessment, planning, and valuation. In: Proceedings of the 11th Annual BIOECON Conference on Economic Instruments to Enhance the Conservation and Sustainable Use of Biodiversity (2009)Google Scholar