Should Neighborhood Effect Be Stable in Urban Geosimulation Model? A Case Study of Tokyo

  • Yaolong Zhao
  • Fei Dong
  • Hong Zhang
Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 6016)

Abstract

Neighborhood effect is one of the most important components in the construction of cellular automata (CA) – based urban geosimulation models. Although some literatures have focused on the neighborhood effect in the study of land-use changes, mechanism of the effect still keeps unknown. Purpose of this paper is to explore the dynamics of neighborhood effect in the case study of the Tokyo metropolitan area of Japan. Neighborhood effect in urban dynamics is evaluated for the four time intervals of 1974-1979, 1979-1984, 1984-1989, and 1989-1994 of the Tokyo metropolitan area using a neighborhood interaction model. The results show that neighborhood effect is quite different for the transition of different land-use types. But for one certain land-use type, although the regressed coefficient, which can represent the neighborhood effect, has a slight difference in different time interval, the general trends of coefficient show similar. This finding indicates that neighborhood effect essentially keeps stable during certain long time period.

Keywords

Urban geosimulation model neighborhood effect GIS cellular automata Tokyo (Japan) 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Benenson, I., Torrens, P.M.: Geosimulation: Automata-based Modeling of Urban Phenomena. John Wiley & Sons, Chichester (2004)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Torrens, P.M., David, O.S.: Cellular automata and urban simulation: where do we go from here? Environment and Planning B 28, 163–168 (2001)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Batty, M.: New ways of looking at cities. Nature 377, 574–574 (1995)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Batty, M., Xie, Y., Sun, Z.: Modeling urban dynamics through GIS-based cellular automata. Computers, Environment and Urban Systems 23, 205–233 (1999)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Clarke, K.C., Gaydos, L.J.: Loose-coupling a cellular automaton model and GIS: long-term urban growth prediction for San Francisco and Washington/Baltimore. International Journal of Geographical Information Science 12, 699–714 (1998)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Goodchild, M.F.: Geographical information science. International Journal of Geographical Information Systems 6, 31–46 (1992)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Dragicevic, S.: GeoComputation: Modeling with spatial agents. Computers, Environment and Urban Systems 32, 415–416 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Stevens, D., Dragicevic, S., Rothley, K.: iCity: A GIS-CA modelling tool for urban planning and decision making. Environmental Modelling & Software 22, 761–773 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Yeh, A.G.O., Li, X.: A constrained CA model for the simulation and planning of sustainable urban forms by using GIS. Environment and Planning B 28, 733–753 (2001)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Batty, M.: Modeling cities as dynamics systems. Nature 231, 426–428 (1971)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    White, R., Engelen, G.: Cellular automata and fractal urban form: a cellular modelling approach to the evolution of urban land-use patters. Environment and Planning A 25, 1175–1199 (1993)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Zhao, Y., Murayama, Y.: A new method to model neighborhood interaction in Cellular Automata-based urban geosimulation. In: Shi, Y., van Albada, G.D., Dongarra, J., Sloot, P.M.A. (eds.) ICCS 2007. LNCS, vol. 4488, pp. 550–557. Springer, Heidelberg (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    White, R., Engelen, G., Uljee, I.: The use of constrained cellular automata for high-resolution modeling of urban land-use dynamics. Environment and Planning B 24, 323–343 (1997)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    White, R., Engelen, G.: High-resolution integrated modelling of the spatial dynamics of urban and regional systems. Computers, Environment and Urban Systems 24, 383–400 (2000)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Phipps, M.: Dynamic behavior of cellular automata under the constraint of neighborhood coherence. Geographical Analysis 21, 197–215 (1989)Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Yang, Y., Billings, S.A.: Neighborhood detection and rule selection from cellular automata pattern. IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics - Part A: Systems and Humans 30, 840–847 (2000)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Mock, J.: Social impact of changing domestic architecture in a neighborhood in Sapporo, Japan. City & Society 2, 41–49 (1988)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Halperin, R.H.: Practicing Community: Class, Culture and Power in an Urban Neighborhood. University of Taxas Press, Austin (1998)Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Zhang, L., Messner, S.F., Liu, J.: An exploration of the determinants of reporting crime to the police in the city of Tianjin, China. Criminology 45, 959–984 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Cotter, J.V., Patrick, L.L.: Disease and ethnicity in an urban environment. Annals of the Association of American Geographers 71, 40–49 (1981)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Holloway, S.R., Mulherin, S.: The effect of adolescent neighborhood poverty on adult employment. Journal of Urban Affairs 26, 427–454 (2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Wu, F.: Calibration of stochastic cellular automata: the application to rural-urban land conversions. International Journal of Geographical Information Science 16, 795–818 (2002)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Wolfram, S.: A New Kind of Science. Wolfram Media, Champaign (2002)MATHGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Torrens, P.M.: How cellular models of urban systems work. Centre for Advanced Spatial Analysis (CASA), University of College London (2000)Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Yeh, A.G.O., Li, X.: A cellular automata model to simulate development density for urban planning. Environment and Planning B 29, 431–450 (2002)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Yeh, A.G.O., Li, X.: Sustainable land development model for rapid growth areas using GIS. International Journal of Geographical Information Science 12, 169–189 (1998)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Li, X., Yeh, A.G.O.: Modeling sustainable urban development by the integration of constrained cellular automata and GIS. International Journal of Geographical Information Science 14, 131–152 (2000)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Wu, F.: SimLand: a prototype to simulate land conversion through the integrated GIS and CA with AHP-derived transition rules. International Journal of Geographical Information Science 12, 63–82 (1998)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Batty, M.: Urban evolution on the desktop: simulation with the use of extended cellular automata. Environment and Planning A 30, 1943–1967 (1998)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Barredo, J.I., Kasanko, M., McCormick, N., Lavalle, C.: Modelling dynamic spatial processes: simulation of urban future scenarios through cellular automata. Landscape and Urban Planning 64, 145–160 (2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Clarke, K.C., Hoppen, S., Gaydos, L.: A self-modifying cellular automaton model of historical urbanization in the San Francisco Bay area. Environment and Planning B 24, 247–261 (1997)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Murayama, Y.: Japanese Urban System. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht (2000)Google Scholar
  33. 33.
    Okawa, I.: Regional transformation of the Tokyo metropolitan area. Taimeido, Tokyo (1989) (in Japanese) Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2010

Authors and Affiliations

  • Yaolong Zhao
    • 1
  • Fei Dong
    • 1
  • Hong Zhang
    • 2
  1. 1.South China Normal UniversityGuangzhouP.R. China
  2. 2.Yunan University of Finance and EconomicsYunanP.R. China

Personalised recommendations