Moral Normativity Is (Naturally) Grown

Chapter
Part of the The Frontiers Collection book series (FRONTCOLL)

Abstract

This chapter suggests an approach to a “naturalistic” explication of moral “ought” that, at the same time, avoids reductionism. The central thesis states that “X ought to do something” means nothing but Y wants X to do it, with “X” and “Y” being any individuals or groups of individuals with the only conditions being that (a) they want something from somebody else and (b) they can understand that “want”. Thus, normativity is a part of the real world. This thesis goes beyond mere biological principles by understanding the moral “ought” as a process of translating volitions that can be described as “exteriorization”. By means of scripture, these exteriorized volitions are institutionalized by existing members of a community, thus outlasting the particular individuals. Since they become part of the cultural heritage, they can be re-interiorized by new members of the community. Interiorized norms are a part of the social world, which every new generation will find and will have to internalize (even if it changes them).

Keywords

Moral Reasoning Moral Norm Evolutionary Ethic Rational Creature Biological Determinant 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

References

  1. Alexander RD (1987) The Biology of Moral Systems. Aldine de Gruyter, New York, NYGoogle Scholar
  2. Darwin C (1879/2004) The Descent of Man and Selection in Relation to Sex. Penguin Books, LondonGoogle Scholar
  3. Flack JC, de Waal FBM (2000) “Any animal whatever”. Darwinian building blocks of morality in monkeys and apes. Journal of Consciousness Studies 7(1–2):1–29Google Scholar
  4. Leroi-Gourhan A (1980) Hand und Wort. Die Evolution von Technik, Sprache und Kunst. Suhrkamp, Frankfurt am MainGoogle Scholar
  5. Tomasello M, Carpenter M, Call J, Behne T, Moll H (2005) Understanding and sharing intentions: the origins of cultural cognition. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 28:675–691PubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Voland E (2007) Seine Kultur ist des Menschen Natur. In: Eibl K, Mellmann K, Zymner R (eds) Im Rücken der Kulturen. Mentis, PaderbornGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2010

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Philosophisches Seminar, Westfälische Wilhelms-UniversitätMünsterGermany

Personalised recommendations