XCase - A Tool for Conceptual XML Data Modeling

  • Jakub Klímek
  • Lukáš Kopenec
  • Pavel Loupal
  • Jakub Malý
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 5968)


Conceptual modeling of XML data was made easier with the introduction of the XSEM model, which utilizes the MDA (Model-driven architecture) ideas of multi-level modeling. XCase is an implementation of this model, enabling users to model their problem domain as a Platform-independent model (PIM), from which Platform-specific models (PSM), XML schemas in our case, can be derived. The main advantage of this approach is maintainability of multiple XML schemas describing the same data from different views as XCase maintains connections between PIM and PSM levels, so that in case of a change to some element, this change can be propagated to all the places where this element is used.


Schema Language Content Container Target Data Model 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. 1.
    Badia, A.: Conceptual Modeling for Semistructured Data. In: Proceedings of the 3rd International Conference on Web Information Systems Engineering Workshops, Singapore, December 2002, pp. 170–177. IEEE Computer Society, Los Alamitos (2002)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Bernauer, M., Kappel, G., Kramler, G.: Representing XML Schema in UML - An UML Profile for XML Schema. Technical Report November 2003, Department of Computer Science, National University of Singapore (2003)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Chen, P.: The Entity-Relationship Model–Toward a Unified View of Data. ACM Transactions on Database Systems 1(1), 9–36 (1976)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Clark, J., Makoto, M.: RELAX NG Specification. Oasis (December 2001),
  5. 5.
    Erl, T.: Service-Oriented Architecture: Concepts, Technology, and Design. Prentice Hall PTR, Upper Saddle River (2005)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Altova Inc. XML Spy 2009 (2009),
  7. 7.
    Loscio, B., Salgado, A., Galvao, L.: Conceptual Modeling of XML Schemas. In: Proceedings of the Fifth ACM CIKM International Workshop on Web Information and Data Management, New Orleans, USA, November 2003, pp. 102–105 (2003)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Mani, M.: Erex: A conceptual model for XML. In: Proceedings of the Second International XML Database Symposium, Toronto, Canada, August 2004, pp. 128–142 (2004)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Miller, J., Mukerji, J.: MDA Guide Version 1.0.1. Object Management Group (2003),
  10. 10.
    Narayanan, K., Ramaswamy, S.: Specifications for Mapping UML Models to XML. In: Proceedings of the 4th Workshop in Software Model Engineering, Montego Bay, Jamaica (2005)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Nečaský, M.: Conceptual Modeling for XML. Dissertations in Database and Information Systems Series, vol. 99. IOS Press/AKA Verlag (January 2009)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Object Management Group. UML Infrastructure Specification 2.1.2 (November 2007),
  13. 13.
    Psaila, G.: ERX: A Conceptual Model for XML Documents. In: Proceedings of the 2000 ACM Symposium on Applied Computing, Como, Italy, March 2000, pp. 898–903. ACM, New York (2000)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Routledge, N., Bird, L., Goodchild, A.: UML and XML Schema. In: Proceedings of 13th Australasian Database Conference (ADC 2002). ACS (2002)Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Sengupta, A., Mohan, S., Doshi, R.: XER - Extensible Entity Relationship Modeling. In: Proceedings of the XML 2003 Conference, Philadelphia, USA, December 2003, pp. 140–154 (2003)Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Bray, T., Paoli, J., Sperberg-McQueen, C.M., Maler, E., Yergeau, F.: Extensible Markup Language (XML) 1.0., W3C, 4th edn. (September 2006),
  17. 17.
    Thompson, H.S., Beech, D., Maloney, M., Mendelsohn, N.: XML Schema Part 1: Structures, W3C, 2nd edn. (October 2004),

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2010

Authors and Affiliations

  • Jakub Klímek
    • 1
  • Lukáš Kopenec
    • 1
  • Pavel Loupal
    • 2
  • Jakub Malý
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Software Engineering, Faculty of Mathematics and PhysicsCharles University in PragueCzech Republic
  2. 2.Department of Computer Science and Engineering, Faculty of Electrical EngineeringCzech Technical UniversityCzech Republic

Personalised recommendations