Criticality Based Decentralised Decision Procedures for Manufacturing Networks Exploiting RFID and Agent Technology

Conference paper


To solve the problem of control system complexity of manufacturing networks they may be modelled as Hausdorff Spaces and respective tangent spaces. Exploiting specific mappings as well as the criticality principles, all control and decision processes may be improved and sped up. Multi Agent Systems in combination with RFID technology are synthesised for a general decision procedure set up where the manufacturing execution control level may be seen as one specification of a generic decision support cycle, which is valid for complex and dynamic manufacturing systems on all levels.


  1. Bennet, A., Bennet, D. (2004), The Intelligent Complex Adaptive System, KMCI Press Elsevier.Google Scholar
  2. Bennett, D., Dekkers, R. (2005), Industrial Networks of the future—a critical commentary on research and practice, 12th International EurOMA Conference on Operational and Global Competitiveness, Budapest Proceedings pp. 677–686.Google Scholar
  3. Diep, D., Alexakos, Ch., Wagner, Th. (2007), An Ontology-based Interoperability Framework for Distributed Manufacturing Control, 12th IEEE International Conference on Emerging Technologies and Factory Automation, 25–28th September 2007, Patras Greece, Proceedings.Google Scholar
  4. Georgoudakis, M., Alexakos, Ch., Kalogeras, A., Gialelis, J., Koubias, S. (2007), Methodology for the efficient distribution a manufacturing ontology to a multi-agent system, 12th IEEE International Conference on Emerging Technologies and Factory Automation, 25–28th September 2007, Patras Greece, Proceedings.Google Scholar
  5. Ivanov, D., Kaschel, J., Sokolov, B., Arldiipov, A. (2006), A Conceptional Framework for Modeling Complex Adaptation of Collaborative Networks. In: Network-Centric Collaboration and Supporting Frameworks, IFIP International Federation for Information Processing, Volume 224, [Camarinha-Matos, L., Afsarmanesh, H., Ollus, M. (eds.)], Springer. Boston, pp. 15–22.Google Scholar
  6. Karasavvas, K., Burger, A., Baldock, R. (2005), A Criticality-Based Framework for Task Composition in Multi-Agent Bioinformatics Integration Systems, Bioinformatics 21(14), pp 3155–3163.Google Scholar
  7. Kauffman, S. (1995), At Home in the Universe: The Search of Laws of Self-Organization and Complexity, New York.Google Scholar
  8. Kuehnle, H. (2007), A system of models contribution to production network (PN) theory. Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing, 18(5), pp 543–551.Google Scholar
  9. Kuehnle, H., Peschke, J. (2006), Agent technology enhancement by embedded RFID for distributed production control, In: Moving up the value chain. University of Strathclyde, Glasgow, pp 731–739.Google Scholar
  10. Kuehnle, H., von der Osten, D. (2008), Planning and Decision Procedures for Networked (Network Centric) Manufacturing, Proceedings of CAMSIM 2008, Institute for Manufacturing, Cambridge.Google Scholar
  11. Lee, J.M. (2000), Introduction to Topological Manifolds, Graduate Texts in Mathematics, 202, New York.Google Scholar
  12. Lüder, A., Peschke, J., Klostermeyer, A., Bratoukhine, A., Sauter, T. (2005), Distributed Automation: PABADIS vs. HMS, IEEE Transactions on Industrial Informatics, 1,1, pp. 31–38.Google Scholar
  13. Lüder, A., Peschke, J., Bratukhin, A., Treytl, A., Kalogeras, A., Gialelis, J. (2007), The Pabadis’Promise Architecture, Journal Automazione e Strumentazione, Nov. 2007, pp. 93–101.Google Scholar
  14. Merelli, E., Armano, G., Cannata, N., Corradini, F, d’Inverno,.M., Doms, A., Lord, P., Martin, A., Milanesi, L., Moller, (2007), Agents in bioinformatics, computational and systems biology, Brief Bioinform, 8(1), pp. 45–59.Google Scholar
  15. Norri, H., Lee, W.B. (2006), Dispersed network manufacturing: Adapting SMEs to compete on the global scale, Journal of Manufacturing Technology Management, Vol. 17 No. 8, pp. 1022–1041.Google Scholar
  16. Olson, E. E., Eoyang, G. H., Beckhard, R., Vaill, P. (2001), Facilitating Organization Change: Lessons from Complexity Science, Jossey-Basss/Pfeiffer, San Francisco.Google Scholar
  17. Slepniov. D., Waehrens, B.V. (2008), Evolving interdependencies in the context of global operations, Proceedings of the 15th EurOMA Conference proc., Groningen.Google Scholar
  18. Surana, A., Kumara, S., Greaves, M., Raghavan, U. N. (2005), Supply-chain Networks: a Complex Adaptive Systems Perspective, International Journal of Production Research, Vol. 43, no. 20, pp. 4235–4265.Google Scholar
  19. Treytl, A., Spenger, W., Riaz, B. (2008), A Secure Agent Platform for Active RFID, 13th IEEE International Conference on Emerging Technologies and Factory Automation, September 15–18, 2008, Hamburg, Germany, Proceedings.Google Scholar
  20. Vyatkin, V. (Ed.), (2007), IEC 61499 Function Blocks for Embedded and Distributed Control Systems Design, ISA Publisher.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer -Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  • Hermann Küehnle
    • 1
  • Arndt Lüeder
    • 1
  • Michael Heinze
    • 1
  1. 1.Otto-von-Guericke-University MagdeburgMagdeburgGermany

Personalised recommendations