Inelastische Stoßprozesse – ein erster Überblick

Dressler, R. A., et al.: 2006, ‘The study of state-selected ion-molecule reactions using the vacuum ultraviolet pulsed field ionization-photoion technique’. J. Chem. Phys. 125, 132306.CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar

Zener, C.: 1932, ‘Non-adiabatic crossing of energy levels’. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. A 137, 696–702.CrossRefADSMATHGoogle Scholar

Fursa, D. V., I. Bray und G. Lister: 2003, ‘Cross sections for electron scattering from the ground state of mercury’. J. Phys. B: At. Mol. Phys. 36, 4255–4271.CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar

Sadeghpour, H. R., J. L. Bohn, M. J. Cavagnero, B. D. Esry, I. I. Fabrikant, J. H. Macek und A. R. P. Rau: 2000, ‘Collisions near threshold in atomic and molecular physics’. J. Phys. B: At. Mol. Phys. 33, R93–R140.CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar

Pichl, L., R. Suzuki, M. Kimura, Y. Li, R. J. Buenker, M. Hoshino und Y. Yamazaki: 2006, ‘Angular dependence of double electron capture in collisions of C⁴⁺ with He - Stueckelberg oscillations in the differential cross-section for capture into C\(^{2+}(1s^22s^2\,^1\mathrm{S})\)’. Eur. Phys. J. D 38, 59–64.CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar

Mikosch, J., et al.: 2008, ‘Imaging nucleophilic substitution dynamics’. Science 319, 183–186.CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar

Buckman, S. J., P. Hammond, G. C. King und F. H. Read: 1983, ‘High-resolution electron-impact excitation-functions of metastable states of neon, argon, krypton and xenon’. J. Phys. B: At. Mol. Phys. 16, 4219–4236.CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar

Newman, D. S., M. Zubek und G. C. King: 1985, ‘A study of resonance structure in mercury using metastable excitation by electron-impact with high-resolution’. J. Phys. B: At. Mol. Phys. 18, 985–998.CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar

Wannier, G. H.: 1953, ‘The threshold law for single ionization of atoms or ions by electrons’. Phys. Rev. 90, 817–825.CrossRefADSMATHGoogle Scholar

Koch, L., T. Heindorff und E. Reichert: 1984, ‘Resonances in the electron-impact excitation of metastable states of mercury’. Z. Phys. A 316, 127–130.CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar

Mikosch, J., U. Frühling, S. Trippel, D. Schwalm, M. Weidemüller und R. Wester: 2006, ‘Velocity map imaging of ion-molecule reactive scattering: The \(\mathrm{Ar}^++\mathrm{N}_2\) charge transfer reaction’. PhysChemChemPhys 8, 2990–2999.Google Scholar

Smith, F. T.: 1969, ‘Diabatic and adiabatic representations for atomic collision problems’. Phys. Rev. 179, 111–123.CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar

Wigner, E. P.: 1948, ‘On the behavior of cross sections near thresholds’. Phys. Rev. 73, 1002–1009.CrossRefADSMATHGoogle Scholar

Hanne, G. F.: 1988, ‘What really happens in the Franck-Hertz experiment with mercury?’. Am. J. Phys. 56, 696–700.CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar

Szmytkowski, C., K. Maciag und G. Karwasz: 1996, ‘Absolute electron-scattering total cross section measurements for noble gas atoms and diatomic molecules’. Phys. Scr. 54, 271–280.CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar

Vinodkumar, M., C. Limbachiya, B. Antony und K. N. Joshipura: 2007, ‘Calculations of elastic, ionization and total cross sections for inert gases upon electron impact: threshold to 2 keV’. J. Phys. B: At. Mol. Phys. 40, 3259–3271.CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar

Bähring, A., I. V. Hertel, E. Meyer, W. Meyer, N. Spies und H. Schmidt: 1984, ‘Excitation of laser state-prepared Na*(3p) to Na*(3d) in low-energy collisions with Na⁺: Experiment and calculations of the potential curves of Na\(_2^+\)’. J. Phys. B: At. Mol. Phys. 17, 2859–2873.CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar

Sigeneger, F., R. Winkler und R. E. Robson: 2003, ‘What really happens with the electron gas in the famous Franck-Hertz experiment?’. Contrib. Plasma Phys. 43, 178–197.CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar

Knoop, S., et al.: 2008, ‘Single-electron capture in keV \(\mathrm{Ar}^{15+\ldots18+}+\mathrm{He}\) collisions’. J. Phys. B: At. Mol. Phys. 41, 195203.CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar

Landau, L.: 1932, ‘Zur Theorie der Energieübertragung. II.’. Phys. Z. Sowjetunion 2, 46–51.MATHGoogle Scholar

Hoshino, M., et al.: 2007, ‘Experimental and theoretical study of double-electron capture in collisions of slow C\(^{4+}(1s^2\,^1\mathrm{S})\) with \(\mathrm{He}(1s^2\,^1\mathrm{S})\)’. Phys. Rev. A 75.Google Scholar

Barat, M., P. Roncin, L. Guillemot, M. N. Gaboriaud und H. Laurent: 1990, ‘Single and double electron-capture by C⁴⁺ ions colliding with helium target’. J. Phys. B: At. Mol. Phys. 23, 2811–2818.CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar

Bommels, J., et al.: 2005, ‘Low-lying resonances in electron-neon scattering: Measurements at 4-meV resolution and comparison with theory’. Phys. Rev. A 71, 012704.CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar

Rapior, G., K. Sengstock und V. Baev: 2006, ‘New features of the Franck-Hertz experiment’. Am. J. Phys. 74, 423–428.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Gopalan, A., et al.: 2003, ‘A novel electron scattering apparatus combining a laser photoelectron source and a triply differentially pumped supersonic beam target: characterization and results for the He⁻(1s 2s²) resonance’. Eur. Phys. J. D 22, 17–29.CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar

Rau, A. R. P.: 1971, ‘2 electrons in a Coulomb Potential - Double-continuum wave Functions and Threshold Law for Electron-Atom Ionization’. Phys. Rev. A 4, 207–220.CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar

Stückelberg, E.: 1932, ‘Theorie der unelastischen Stösse zwischen Atomen’. Helv. Phys. Acta 5, 369.MATHGoogle Scholar

Wittig, C.: 2005, ‘The Landau-Zener formula’. J. Phys. Chem. B 109, 8428–8430.CrossRefGoogle Scholar