WISEBED: An Open Large-Scale Wireless Sensor Network Testbed

  • Ioannis Chatzigiannakis
  • Stefan Fischer
  • Christos Koninis
  • Georgios Mylonas
  • Dennis Pfisterer
Part of the Lecture Notes of the Institute for Computer Sciences, Social Informatics and Telecommunications Engineering book series (LNICST, volume 29)

Abstract

In this paper we present an overview of WISEBED, a large-scale wireless sensor network testbed, which is currently being built for research purposes. This project is led by a number of European Universities and Research Institutes, hoping to provide scientists, researchers and companies with an environment to conduct experiments with, in order to evaluate and validate their sensor network-related work. The initial planning of the project includes a large, heterogeneous testbed, consisting of at least 9 geographically disparate networks that include both sensor and actuator nodes, and scaling in the order of thousands (currently being in total 550 nodes). We present here the overall architecture of WISEBED, focusing on certain aspects of the software ecosystem surrounding the project, such as the Open Federation Alliance, which will enable a view of the whole testbed, or parts of it, as single entities, and the testbed’s tight integration with the Shawn network simulator. We also present examples of the actual hardware used currently in the testbed and outline the architecture of two of the testbed’s sites.

Keywords

WISEBED testbed sensor network large-scale experiment open federated portal web services heterogeneous actuators software library simulation 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    WISEBED project website, http://www.wisebed.eu/
  2. 2.
    Dutta, P., et al.: Trio: enabling sustainable and scalable outdoor wireless sensor network deployments. In: 5th International conference on Information processing in sensor networks (IPSN), pp. 407–415. ACM Press, New York (2006)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Werner-Allen, G., Swieskowski, P., Welsh, M.: Motelab: A wireless sensor network testbed. In: Fourth International Conference on Information Processing in Sensor Networks (IPSN). IEEE, Piscataway (2005); special Track on Platform Tools and Design Methods for Network Embedded Sensors (SPOTS)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Handziski, V., Kopke, A., Willig, A., Wolisz, A.: Twist: A scalable and reconfigurable wireless sensor network testbed for indoor deployments. Tech. Rep. TKN-05-008 (November 2005)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Tutornet: A tiered wireless sensor network testbed, http://enl.usc.edu/projects/tutornet/
  6. 6.
    Chun, B.N., et al.: Mirage: A microeconomic resource allocation system for sensornet testbeds. In: 2nd IEEE Workshop on Embedded Networked Sensors (2005)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Ertin, E., et al.: Kansei: A testbed for sensing at scale. In: 5th International conference on Information processing in sensor networks, IPSN (2006)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Johnson, D., et al.: Mobile emulab: A robotic wireless and sensor network. In: 25th IEEE Conference on Computer Communications, INFOCOM (2006)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Murty, R., Mainland, G., Rose, I., Chowdhury, A., Gosain, A., Bers, J., Welsh, M.: Citysense: An urban-scale wireless sensor network and testbed. In: 2008 IEEE Conference on Technologies for Homeland Security, May 2008, pp. 583–588 (2008)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    SENSEI project website, http://ict-sensei.org/
  11. 11.
    Henricksen, K., Robinson, R.: A survey of middleware for sensor networks: State-of-the-art and future directions. In: Proc. of MidSens 2006 (2006)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Hadim, S., Mohamed, N.: Middleware challenges and approaches for wireless sensor networks. IEEE Distributed Systems Online 7(3) (2006)Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Romer, K., Kasten, O., Mattern, F.: Middleware challenges for wireless sensor networks. ACM Mobile Computing and Communications Review 6, 59–61 (2002)Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Kuorilehto, M., Hannikainen, M., Hamalainen, T.: A survey of Application Distribution in Wireless Sensor Networks. EURASIP Journal on Wireless Communication and Networking 5, 774–788 (2005)Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    R. Project, Survey of middleware for networked embedded systems, deliverable 5.1 (2005)Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Levis, P., Lee, N., Welsh, M., Culler, D.: Tossim: accurate and scalable simulation of entire tinyos applications. In: SenSys 2003: Proceedings of the 1st international conference on Embedded networked sensor systems, pp. 126–137. ACM Press, New York (2003)Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Tolle, G., Culler, D.: Design of an application-cooperative management system for wireless sensor networks. In: European Cinference on Wireless Sensor Networks, EWSN 2005 (2005)Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Ramanathan, R., et al.: Sympathy for the sensor network debugger. In: 3rd International Conference on Embedded Networked Sensor Systems (SenSys), pp. 255–267 (2005)Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Rost, S., Balakrishnan, H.: Memento: A health monitoring system for wireless sensor networks. In: SECON 2006 (2006)Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Whitehouse, K., et al.: Marionette: using rpc for interactive development and debugging of wireless embedded networks. In: 5th International conference on Information processing in sensor networks (IPSN), pp. 416–423. ACM Press, New York (2006)Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Ringwald, M., Römer, K., Vitaletti, A.: Passive inspection of sensor networks. In: Aspnes, J., Scheideler, C., Arora, A., Madden, S. (eds.) DCOSS 2007. LNCS, vol. 4549, pp. 205–222. Springer, Heidelberg (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Crepaldi, R., Friso, S., Harris, A., Mastrogiovanni, M., Petrioli, C., Rossi, M., Zanella, A., Zorzi, M.: The design, deployment, and analysis of signetlab: A sensor network testbed and interactive management tool, May 2007, pp. 1–10 (2007)Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Chen, B.-R., Peterson, G., Mainland, G., Welsh, M.: Livenet: Using passive monitoring to reconstruct sensor network dynamics. In: Nikoletseas, S.E., Chlebus, B.S., Johnson, D.B., Krishnamachari, B. (eds.) DCOSS 2008. LNCS, vol. 5067, pp. 79–98. Springer, Heidelberg (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Österlind, F., Dunkels, A., Voigt, T., Tsiftes, N., Eriksson, J., Finne, N.: Sensornet checkpointing: Enabling repeatability in testbeds and realism in simulations. In: Roedig, U., Sreenan, C.J. (eds.) EWSN 2009. LNCS, vol. 5432, pp. 343–357. Springer, Heidelberg (2009), http://dblp.uni-trier.de/db/conf/ewsn/ewsn2009.html#OsterlindDVTEF09 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
  26. 26.
    Kröller, A., Pfisterer, D., Buschmann, C., Fekete, S.P., Fischer, S.: Shawn: A new approach to simulating wireless sensor networks. In: Design, Analysis, and Simulation of Distributed Systems (DASD 2005), pp. 117–124 (2005)Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    Fekete, S.P., Kröller, A., Fischer, S., Pfisterer, D.: Shawn: The fast, highly customizable sensor network simulator. In: Proceedings of the Fourth International Conference on Networked Sensing Systems (INSS 2007) (June 2007)Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    Lipphardt, M., Hellbrück, H., Pfisterer, D., Ransom, S., Fischer, S.: Practical experiences on mobile inter-body-area-networking. In: Proceedings of the Second International Conference on Body Area Networks, BodyNets 2007 (2007), http://www.bodynets.org/
  29. 29.
    Coalesenses iSense - A modular hardware and software platform for wireless sensor networks, http://www.coalesenses.com/isense
  30. 30.
    Design of the Hardware Infrastructure, Architecture of the Software Infrastructure, and Design of Library of Algorithms, http://www.wisebed.eu/index.php/deliverables
  31. 31.
    Pfisterer, D., Lipphardt, M., Buschmann, C., Hellbrueck, H., Fischer, S., Sauselin, J.H.: MarathonNet: Adding value to large scale sport events - a connectivity analysis. In: Press, A. (ed.) Proceedings of the International Conference on Integrated Internet Ad hoc and Sensor Networks (InterSense 2006), May 2006, p. 12 (2006), http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/1142680.1142696

Copyright information

© ICST Institute for Computer Science, Social Informatics and Telecommunications Engineering 2010

Authors and Affiliations

  • Ioannis Chatzigiannakis
    • 1
  • Stefan Fischer
    • 2
  • Christos Koninis
    • 1
  • Georgios Mylonas
    • 1
  • Dennis Pfisterer
    • 2
  1. 1.Computer Technology Institute and University of Patras, N. Kazantzaki, RioPatrasGreece
  2. 2.University of Lübeck and Institute of TelematicsLübeckGermany

Personalised recommendations