Advertisement

Low-Power Radio Communication in Industrial Outdoor Deployments: The Impact of Weather Conditions and ATEX-Compliance

  • Carlo Alberto Boano
  • James Brown
  • Zhitao He
  • Utz Roedig
  • Thiemo Voigt
Part of the Lecture Notes of the Institute for Computer Sciences, Social Informatics and Telecommunications Engineering book series (LNICST, volume 29)

Abstract

Industry recognizes wireless sensor networks as one of the next major technical and economical shifts in automation and control systems. Industrial applications need performance assurances of wireless communication, which is hard to attain given the variability of the environment where such applications are deployed. In this paper, we quantify the impact of environmental conditions, namely temperature, fog, and rain on wireless communication links. We further investigate the influence of industrial casing on communication, evaluating an ATEX enclosure intended for use in potentially explosive atmospheres. Knowledge of the potential impact of environmental conditions and special casings provides an important input to robust communication design during deployment planning.

Keywords

Industrial outdoor deployment wireless sensor networks temperature impact weather conditions RSSI LQI ATEX compliance 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Bannister, K., Giorgetti, G., Gupta, S.K.S.: Wireless sensor networking for hot applications: Effects of temperature on signal strength, data collection and localization. In: Proceedings of the fifth Workshop on Embedded Networked Sensors (HotEmNets 2008), Charlottesville, Virginia, USA (June 2008)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Anastasi, G., Falchi, A., Passarella, A., Conti, M., Gregori, E.: Performance measurements of motes sensor networks. In: Proceedings of the 7th ACM international symposium on Modeling, analysis and simulation of wireless and mobile systems (MSWiM 2004), Venice, Italy (October 2004)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Sun, J., Oliver, R.C.: An experimental evaluation of temporal characteristics of communication links in outdoor sensor networks. In: Proceedings of the second Workshop on Real-World Wireless Sensor Networks (REALWSN 2006), Uppsala, Sweden (June 2006)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Capsuto, B., Frolik, J.: Demo abstract: A system to monitor signal fade due to weather phenomena for outdoor sensor systems. In: Proceedings of the Fifth International Conference on Information Processing in Sensor Networks (IPSN 2006), Nashville, TN, USA (April 2006)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    ATEX Guidelines. Web page, http://ec.europa.eu/enterprise/atex/guide/ (Visited 2009-02-14)
  6. 6.
    Thelen, J., Goense, D., Langendoen, K.: Radio wave propagation in potato fields. In: Proceedings of the 1st workshop on wireless network measurement, Riva del Garda, Italy (April 2005)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    CWNP certifications. Rain fade margin, http://www.cwnp.com (Visited 2009-02-14)
  8. 8.
    Covad Communications Group. Wireless networking backgrounder (March 2007), http://www.covadwireless.com/documents/wirelessWhitepaper.pdf
  9. 9.
    AFAR Communications Inc. 900 mhz versus 2.4 ghz in long distance links, http://www.afar.net/tutorials/900-mhz-versus-2.4-ghz/ (Visited 2009-02-14)
  10. 10.
    Chipcon, A.S.: CC2420 datasheet - 2.4 GHz IEEE 802.15.4 / ZigBee-Ready RF Transceiver (Rev. B) (March 2007)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Moteiv Corporation. Tmote Sky - Datasheet, edition 1.04 edn. (November 2006)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Chipcon, A.S.: CC1020 datasheet - Low-Power RF Transceiver for Narrowband Systems (Rev. B) (July 2008)Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    ScatterWeb GmbH. MSB: modular sensor board, version 1.0 edn. (Visited 2009-02-14)Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Baar, M., Köppe, E., Liers, A., Schiller, J.: Poster abstract: The scatterweb msb-430 platform for wireless sensor networks. In: Contiki Workshop 2007, Kista, Stockholm, Sweden (March 2007)Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Srinivasan, K., Levis, P.: Rssi is under appreciated. In: Proceedings of the Third Workshop on Embedded Networked Sensors (EmNets 2006), Cambridge, MA, USA (May 2006)Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Srinivasan, K., Dutta, P., Tavakoli, A., Levis, P.: Understanding the causes of packet delivery success and failure in dense wireless sensor networks. In: Proceedings of the 4th ACM Conference on Embedded Networked Sensor Systems (SenSys 2006), Boulder, Colorado, USA, November 2006, pp. 419–420 (2006)Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Holland, M.M., Aures, R.G., Heinzelman, W.B.: Experimental investigation of radio performance in wireless sensor networks. In: Proceedings of the 2nd IEEE Workshop on Wireless Mesh Networks (WiMesh 2006), Reston, Virginia, USA (September 2006)Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Chipcon A.S.: CC2400 datasheet - 2.4 GHz Low-Power RF Transceiver (Rev. 1.5) (March 2006), http://focus.ti.com/lit/ds/symlink/cc2400.pdf (Last visited January 2009)
  19. 19.
    Dunkels, A., Grönvall, B., Voigt, T.: Contiki - a lightweight and flexible operating system for tiny networked sensors. In: Workshop on Embedded Networked Sensors, Tampa, Florida, USA (November 2004)Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Sensirion, A.: SHT1x Humidity and Temperature Sensor datasheet, version 2.04 edn. (May 2005)Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Lal, D., Manjeshwar, A., Herrmann, F., Uysal-Biyikoglu, E., Keshavarzian, A.: Measurement and characterization of link quality metrics in energy constrained wireless sensor networks. In: IEEE Global Telecommunications Conference (GLOBECOM 2003), December 2003, pp. 446–452 (2003)Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Senel, M., Chintalapudi, K., Lal, D., Keshavarzian, A., Coyle, E.J.: A kalman filter based link quality estimation scheme for wireless sensor networks. In: IEEE Global Telecommunications Conference (GLOBECOM 2007), November 2007, pp. 875–880 (2007)Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Fogelberg, B.: Kistavädret, http://soloregn.se/ (Visited 2009-02-14)
  24. 24.
    Benson, J.P., O’Donovan, T., O’Sullivan, P., Roedig, U., Sreenan, C.J., Barton, J., Murphy, A., O’Flynn, B.: Car-park management using wireless sensor networks. In: LCN, pp. 588–595 (2006)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© ICST Institute for Computer Science, Social Informatics and Telecommunications Engineering 2010

Authors and Affiliations

  • Carlo Alberto Boano
    • 1
  • James Brown
    • 2
  • Zhitao He
    • 1
  • Utz Roedig
    • 2
  • Thiemo Voigt
    • 1
  1. 1.Swedish Institute of Computer ScienceKistaSweden
  2. 2.Computing DeparmentLancaster UniversityLancasterUK

Personalised recommendations