Parademo: e-Democracy Based on a Delegated Expert Selection Process in a Small-World Network
Many countries have a representative democracy where their governments consist of a relatively small group of politicians that represent the values and beliefs of the majority of the voters. Unfortunately, many citizens are un- satisfied with their rather limited influence on politics especially regarding governments on national level or even higher like the EU or the UN. On the other side, referenda or direct democracies seem to be a too risky way of letting un- knowledgeable or uninterested individuals decide over complex issues. We mainly have these extreme opposites in our democracies due to the limitations of our manually maintained ballot system. Initiatives like Vivarto propose an alternative, called ’Delegated voting’ where parts of a vote can be delegated to people with more knowledge on a certain topic. This leads to a convenient position in the middle between both mentioned extremes. We want to use the vast amount of expertise of many online citizens in our societies in selecting the right politicians and solutions. In this paper we propose the design of system called Parademo, that enables a fine-grained e-democracy. Next to this we briefly describe how we can achieve more transparency and third-party functionality by allowing listeners to subscribe to specific information-streams within communities that are formalized in a Semantic-Web language.
KeywordsE-democracy Small-world expertise Tokens Fine-grained voting delegation Semantic Web Voting Cafés
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
- 1.Nordfors, M., et al.: The demoex portal (2006), http://demoex.net/en/
- 4.Krimmer, R. (ed.): Electronic Voting 2006: 2nd International Workshop, Co-organized by Council of Europe, ESF TED, IFIP WG 8.6 and E-Voting. CC, August 2- 4, 2006 in Castle Hofen, Bregenz, Austria. LNI, vol. 86. GI (2006)Google Scholar
- 5.Madise, Ü., Martens, T.: E-voting in estonia 2005. the first practice of country-wide binding internet voting in the world. In: Krimmer , pp. 15–26 (2005)Google Scholar
- 6.Milgram, S.: The small world problem. Psychology Today 31(2), 60–67 (1967)Google Scholar
- 7.Nazir, A., Raza, S., Chuah, C.N.: Unveiling facebook: a measurement study of social network based applications. In: IMC 2008: Proceedings of the 8th ACM SIGCOMM conference on Internet measurement, pp. 43–56. ACM, New York (2008)Google Scholar
- 8.Rodriges-Filho, J., Alexander, C., Batista, L.: E-voting in Brazil - the risks to democracy. In: Electronic Voting 2006. GI Lecture Notes in Informatics, pp. 85–94 (2006)Google Scholar
- 11.Saebo, O., Pivrinta, T.: Defining the ”e” in e-democracy: a genre lens on it artifacts. In: 29th Information Systems Research Seminar in Scandinavia (2006)Google Scholar