DigiBiz 2009: Digital Business pp 35-44 | Cite as

Analysing Requirements for Virtual Business Alliances – The Case of SPIKE

  • Christian Broser
  • Christoph Fritsch
  • Oliver Gmelch
  • Günther Pernul
  • Rolf Schillinger
  • Sandra Wiesbeck
Part of the Lecture Notes of the Institute for Computer Sciences, Social Informatics and Telecommunications Engineering book series (LNICST, volume 21)

Abstract

More and more companies are realising that business is best carried out in project-based virtual alliances and are intensively networking and collaborating with partner companies. This requires convergent, adaptive, and interoperable IT environments ready to support flexible, loosely coupled networked enterprises, anywhere, anytime - regardless of heterogeneous systems and applications in use. In this paper, a methodology for gathering and analysing user requirements is applied which is specifically tailored for incorporating multi-party views such as necessary for the development of collaboration platforms to support virtual alliances and to prove its significance in a real-world case study. The work presented is performed within the SPIKE project, focusing on the technical, methodological and organisational support of short-term and project-based business alliances between organisations of all types and sizes.

Keywords

Collaboration networked enterprise virtual alliance collecting and engineering requirements 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Van Heck, E., Vervest, P.: Smart Business Networks – How the Network Wins. Communications of the ACM 50(6), 29–37 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    AT&T Knowledge Ventures: Collaboration across borders, http://www.corp.att.com/emea/docs/s5_collaboration_eng.pdf
  3. 3.
    Gartner Says Worldwide Web Conference and Team Collaboration Software Markets Will Reach $2.8 Billon in 2010, https://www.gartner.com/it/page.jsp?id=507717
  4. 4.
    Thompson, K.: The Networked Enterprise. Competing for the Future Through Virtual Enterprise Networks. Meghan Kiffer, Tampa (2008)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Alt, R., Smits, M.: Networkability of organisations and business networks. In: Proc. of the Fifteenth European Conference on Information Systems (ECIS), St. Gallen, Switzerland, pp. 119–130 (2007)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Kasper-Fuehrer, E., Ashkanasy, N.: The interorganisational virtual organisation: Defining a Weberian ideal. International Studies of Management & Organisation 33(4), 34–64 (2003)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Abuelmaatti, A., Rezgui, Y.: Virtual team working – Current issues and directions for the future. In: Proc. of IFIP Pervasive Collaborative Networks, vol. 283, pp. 351–360 (2008)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Maguire, M., Bevan, N.: User requirements analysis. A review of supporting methods. In: Proc. of IFIP 17th World Computer Congress, vol. 226, pp. 133–148. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht (2002)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    ISO 9241: Ergonomics requirements for office work with visual display terminals (VDTs), International Standards OrganisationGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Pettey, C.: Gartner Says SOA Will Be Used in More Than 50 Percent of New Mission-Critical Operational Applications and Business Processes Designed in 2007 (2007), http://www.gartner.com/it/page.jsp?id=503864
  11. 11.
    Prause, C.R., Scholten, M., Zimmermann, A., Reiners, R., Eisenhauer, M.: Managing the Iterative Requirements Process in a Multi-National Project using an Issue Tracker. In: Proc. 2008 IEEE Int. Conference on Global Software Engineering, pp. 151–159 (2008)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Davis, G.B.: Strategies for Information Requirements Determination. IBM Systems Journal 21(1), 3–30 (1982)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© ICST Institute for Computer Science, Social Informatics and Telecommunications Engineering 2010

Authors and Affiliations

  • Christian Broser
    • 1
  • Christoph Fritsch
    • 1
  • Oliver Gmelch
    • 1
  • Günther Pernul
    • 1
  • Rolf Schillinger
    • 1
  • Sandra Wiesbeck
    • 2
  1. 1.Department of Information SystemsUniversity of RegensburgGermany
  2. 2.IT-Inkubator Ostbayern GmbHGermany

Personalised recommendations