Speciation of Actinides in Granite Subjected to Tracer Studies

  • Melissa A. Denecke
  • Wout de Nolf
  • Alexander Rack
  • Remi Tucoulou
  • Tonya Vitova
  • Gerald Falkenberg
  • Sousan Abolhassani
  • Peter Cloetens
  • Bernhard Kienzler


Tomographic studies of granite from the Äspö Underground Laboratory in Sweden are performed to understand the observed release of natural uranium in column studies upon application of groundwater flow. X-ray phase-sensitive tomography images reconstructed from in-line X-ray phase contrasted radiographs were compared with scanning fluorescence tomography reconstructions. The latter are based on sinograms of X-ray emission lines recorded with spatial resolution on a nanometer scale for a granite rock containing U after being subjected to a radionuclide tracer experiment. The results show that the U distribution follows microfissures or pores in the granite. Naturally occurring Th is revealed to be intimately associated with what appears to be feldspar, suggesting its being present as a dopant ion in the mineral structure. Neptunium tracer was not found in a sample prepared using FIB lift-out techniques, although the presence of Np was identified in the original granite piece during screening experiments prior to FIB-ing. The Np-containing part of the sample broke off during the preparation. Although this case study was limited to only three samples, initial interpretation of results confirm that Th is less likely than U to become mobile in groundwater upon drilling and excavation of emplacement caverns and shafts for a nuclear waste repository in granite bedrock.


European Synchrotron Radiation Facility Nuclear Waste Repository Hard Rock Laboratory Fissure Wall Sample Pillar 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.



We thank HASYLAB and the ESRF for awarding us beamtime. We also are grateful to E. Sobolla (KIT-INE) and Julijana Krbanjevic (PSI) for preparation of the ground and FIB-ed samples and J. Göttlicher (KIT) for expert improvement of this manuscript. We acknowledge financial support as a Joint Research Group between the German Helmholtz Society and the Russian Basic Research Foundation (HRJRG-011 and 07-03-92280-SIG_a).


  1. 1.
    Kienzler, B, Vejmelka, P, Römer, J, Jansson, M (2009) Actinide migration in fractures of granite host rock: laboratory and in situ investigations. Nucl. Technol. 165:223–240Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Denecke, MA, Brendebach, B, De Nolf, W, Falkenberg, G, Janssens, K, Simon, R (2009) Spatially resolved μ-XRF and μ-XAFS study of a fractured granite bore core following a radiotracer experiment. Spectrochim. Acta B 64:791–795CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Overwijk, MHF, van den Heuvel, FC, Bulle-Lieuwma, CWT (1993) Novel scheme for the preparation of transmission electron microscopy specimens with a focused ion beam. J. Vac. Sci. Technol. B11:2021–2024Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Falkenberg, G, Rickers, K, Bilderback, DH, Huang, R (2003) A Single-bounce Capillary for Focusing of Hard X-rays.
  5. 5.
    Huang, R, Bilderback, DH (2006) Single-bounce monocapillaries for focusing synchrotron radiation: modeling, measurements and theoretical limits. J. Synchrotron Radiat. 13:74–84CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Vekemans, B, Janssens, K, Vincze, L, Adams, F, Van Espen, P (1994) Analysis of X-ray spectra by iterative least squares (AXIL): new developments. X-ray Spectrom. 23:278CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Bleuet, P, Simionovici, A, Lemelle, L, Ferroir, T, Cloetens, P, Tucoulou, R, Susini, J (2008) Hard X-rays nanoscale fluorescence imaging of earth and planetary science samples. Appl. Phys. Lett. 92:213111CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Ortega, R, Cloetens, P, Devès, G, Carmona, A, Bohic, S (2007) Iron storage within dopamine neurovesicles revealed by chemical nano-imaging. PLoS ONE 2(9):e925CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Bleuet, P, Cloetens, P, Gergaud, P, Mariolle, D, Chevalier, N, Tucoulou, R, Susini, J, Chabli, A (2009) A hard X-ray nanoprobe for scanning and projection nanotomography. Rev. Sci. Instrum. 80:056101CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Somogyi, A, Tucoulou, R, Martinez-Criado, G, Homs, A, Bleuet, P, Simionovici, A (2005) ID22: a multitechnique hard X-ray microprobe beamline at the European Synchrotron Radiation Facility. J. Synchrotron Radiat. 12:208–215CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Labiche, J-C, Mathon, O, Pascarelli, S, Newton, MA, Ferre, GG, Curfs, C, Vaughan, G, Homs, A, Carreiras, DF (2007) The fast readout low noise camera as a versatile X-ray detector for time resolved dispersive extended X-ray absorption fine structure and diffraction studies of dynamic problems in materials science, chemistry, and catalysis. Rev. Sci. Instrum. 78: 0901301CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Lange, K, Carson, R (1984) EM reconstruction algorithms for emission and transmission tomography. J. Comput. Assist. Tomogr. 8(2):306Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    De Nolf, W, Janssen, K (2010) Micro X-ray diffraction and fluorescence tomography for the study of multilayered automotive paints. Surf. Interf. Anal. 42:411–418CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Sole, VA, Papillon, E, Cotte, M, Walter, P, Susini, J (2007) A multiplatform code for the analysis of energy-dispersive X-ray fluorescence spectra. Spectrochim. Acta B62:63Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Paganin, D, Mayo, SC, Gureyev, TE, Miller, PR, Wilkins, SW (2002) Simultaneous phase and amplitude extraction from a single defocused image of a homogeneous object. J. Microsc. 206:33–40CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Cloetens, P, Ludwig, W, Baruchel, J, Van Dyck, D, Van Landuyt, J, Guigay, JP, Schlenker, M (1999) Holotomography: quantitative phase tomography with micrometer resolution using hard synchrotron radiation X-rays. Appl. Phys. Lett. 75:2912–2914CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Weitzel, H, Schrocke, H (1980) Kristallstrukturverfeinerungen von euxenit, Y(Nb0.5Ti0.5)2O6, und M-fergusonit, YNbO4. Zeitschrift für Kristallographie 152:69–82CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Abolhassani, S, Gasser, P (2006) Preparation of TEM samples of metal-oxide interface by focused ion beam. J. Microsc. doi:  10.1111/j.1365-2818.2006.01599 Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Schroer, CG, Boye, P, Feldkamp, JM, Patommel, J, Samberg, D, Schropp, A, Schwab, A, Stephan, S, Falkenberg, G, Wellenreuther, G, Reimers, N (2010) Hard X-ray nanoprobe at beamline P06 at PETRA III. Nucl. Instrum. Methods Phys. Res. A 616:93–97CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Denecke, MA, Janssens, K, Proost, K, Rothe, J, Noseck, U (2005) Confocal micro-XRF and micro-XAFS studies of uranium speciation in a tertiary sediment from a waste disposal natural analogue site. Environ. Sci. Technol. 39(7):2049–2058CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Schoch, AE, Scheepers, R (1990) The distribution of uranium and thorium in the cape columbine granite from the southwestern cape province, South Africa. Ore Geol. Rev. 5:223–246CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  • Melissa A. Denecke
    • 1
  • Wout de Nolf
    • 2
  • Alexander Rack
    • 3
  • Remi Tucoulou
    • 3
  • Tonya Vitova
    • 1
  • Gerald Falkenberg
    • 4
  • Sousan Abolhassani
    • 5
  • Peter Cloetens
    • 3
  • Bernhard Kienzler
    • 1
  1. 1.Institute for Nuclear Waste DisposalKarlsruhe Institute of TechnologyKarlsruheGermany
  2. 2.Department of ChemistryUniversity of AntwerpAntwerpBelgium
  3. 3.European Synchrotron Radiation FacilityGrenoble CedexFrance
  4. 4.HASYLAB at DESYHamburgGermany
  5. 5.Laboratory for Materials BehaviourPaul-Scherrer-InsituteVilligen PSI VilligenSwitzerland

Personalised recommendations