Nasal Polyposis: Aggressive Sinus Marsupialization Including the Endoscopic Modified Lothrop Procedure

  • Erik Kent Weitzel
  • Harshita Pant
  • May Thwin
  • Peter-John Wormald
Chapter

Abstract

Symptomatic polypoid chronic rhinosinusitis (CRS) that fails an adequate medical trial responds well to endoscopic sinus surgery (ESS). More aggressive (extensive) ESS leads to better clinical outcomes with polypoid CRS. Successful surgical management of the frontal sinus is the most challenging aspect of the management of nasal polyposis. In patients who develop recurrent polyps after surgery, the modified endoscopic Lothrop procedure, Draf III or frontal drillout produces better outcomes, and in some cases a cure, than standard revision ESS.

References

  1. 1.
    Bhattacharya N (2007) Influence of polyps on outcomes after endoscopic sinus surgery. Laryngoscope 117:4Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Hosemann W, Kuhnel T, Held P et al (1997) Endonasal frontal sinusotomy in surgical management of chronic sinusitis: a critical evaluation. Am J Rhinol 11:1–9PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Jankowski R, Pigret D, Decroocq F et al (2006) Comparison of radical (nasalization) and functional ethmoidectomy in patients with severe sinonasal polyposis. A retrospective study. Rev Laryngol Otol Rhinol (Bord) 127:131–140Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Orlandi RR, Kennedy DW (2001) Revision endoscopic frontal sinus surgery. Otolaryngol Clin North Am 34:13CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Pant H, Kette FE, Smith WB et al (2006) Eosinophilic mucus chronic rhinosinusitis: clinical subgroups or a homogeneous pathogenic entity? Laryngoscope 116:1241–1247PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Rajapaksa SP, Ananda A, Cain T et al (2004) The effect of the modified endoscopic Lothrop procedure on the mucociliary clearance of the frontal sinus in an animal model. Am J Rhinol 18:183–187PubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Robinson SR, Baird R, Le T et al (2005) The incidence of complications after canine fossa puncture performed during endoscopic sinus surgery. Am J Rhinol 19:203–206PubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Sathananthar S, Nagaonkar S, Paleri V et al (2005) Canine fossa puncture and clearance of the maxillary sinus for the severely diseased maxillary sinus. Laryngoscope 115: 1026–1029PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Singhal D, Douglas R, Robinson S et al (2007) The incidence of complications using new landmarks and a modified technique of canine fossa puncture. Am J Rhinol 21: 316–319PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Tran KN, Beule AG, Singal D et al (2007) Frontal ostium restenosis after the endoscopic modified Lothrop procedure. Laryngoscope 117:1457–1462PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Weber R, Draf W, Kratzsch B et al (2001) Modern concepts of frontal sinus surgery. Laryngoscope 111:9CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Weber R, Draf W, Kratzsch B, Hosemann W, Schaefer SD (2001) Modern concepts of frontal sinus surgery. Laryngoscope 111:9CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Wormald PJ (2003) Salvage frontal sinus surgery: the endoscopic modified Lothrop procedure. Laryngoscope 113: 276–283PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Wormald PJ (2007) Endoscopic sinus surgery, 2nd edn. Thieme, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Wormald PJ, Chan SZ (2003) Surgical techniques for the removal of frontal recess cells obstructing the frontal ostium. Am J Rhinol 17:221–226PubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Wormald PJ, Ananda A, Nair S (2003) The modified endoscopic Lothrop procedure in the treatment of complicated chronic frontal sinusitis. Clin Otolaryngol Allied Sci 28: 215–220PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2010

Authors and Affiliations

  • Erik Kent Weitzel
    • 1
  • Harshita Pant
    • 2
  • May Thwin
    • 2
  • Peter-John Wormald
    • 2
  1. 1.Department of OtoHNSLackland AFBUSA
  2. 2.Department of Otolaryngology Head and Neck SurgeryUniversity of Adelaide, Queen Elizabeth HospitalWoodville SouthAustralia

Personalised recommendations