Learning User Preferences for 2CP-Regression for a Recommender System

  • Alan Eckhardt
  • Peter Vojtáš
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 5901)

Abstract

In this paper we deal with a task to learn a general user model from user ratings of a small set of objects. This general model is used to recommend top-k objects to the user. We consider several (also some new) alternatives of learning local preferences and several alternatives of aggregation (with or without 2CP-regression). The main contributions are evaluation of experiments on our prototype tool PrefWork with respect to several satisfaction measures and the proposal of method Peak for normalisation of numerical attributes. Our main objective is to keep the number of sample data which the user has to rate reasonable small.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Eckhardt, A.: Prefwork – a Framework for User Preference Learning Methods Testing. In: Vojtas, P. (ed.) Proceedings of ITAT 2009 Information Technologies - Applications and Theory, Slovakia, CEUR-WS.org (to appear, 2009)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Joachims, T.: Optimizing Search Engines Using Clickthrough Data. In: KDD 2002: Proceedings of the Eighth ACM SIGKDD International Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining, pp. 133–142. ACM Press, New York (2002)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Joachims, T., Granka, L., Pan, B., Hembrooke, H., Gay, G.: Accurately Interpreting Clickthrough Data as Implicit Feedback. In: SIGIR 2005: Proceedings of the 28th Annual International ACM SIGIR Conference on Research and Development in Information Retrieval, pp. 154–161. ACM, New York (2005)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Cao-Van, K.: Supervised Ranking, from Semantics to Algorithms. Ph.D. Dissertation, Ghent University (2003)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Apolloni, B., Zamponi, G., Zanaboni, A.M.: Learning Fuzzy Decision Trees. Neural Networks 11(5), 885–895 (1998)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Holland, S., Ester, M., Kiessling, W.: Preference Mining: A Novel Approach on Mining User Preferences for Personalized Applications. In: Lavrač, N., Gamberger, D., Todorovski, L., Blockeel, H. (eds.) PKDD 2003. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 2838, pp. 204–216. Springer, Heidelberg (2003)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Jung, S.Y., Hong, J.H., Kim, T.S.: A Statistical Model for User Preference. Knowledge and Data Engineering. IEEE Transactions on Knowledge and Data Engineering 17(6), 834–843 (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Boutilier, C., Brafman, R.I., Hoos, H.H., Poole, D.: Cp-Nets: A Tool for Representing and Reasoning with Conditional Ceteris Paribus Preference Statements. Journal of Artificial Intelligence Research 21 (2004)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Lang, J., Mengin, J.: The Complexity of Learning Separable Ceteris Paribus Preferences. In: International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence (2009)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Koriche, F., Zanuttini, B.: Learning Conditional Preference Networks with Queries. In: Boutilier, C. (ed.) Proc. 21st International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence (IJCAI 2009), pp. 1930–1935 (2009)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Chevaleyre, Y., Koriche, F., Lang, J., Mengin, J., Zanuttini, B.: Learning Ordinal Preferences on Multiattribute Domains: the Case of Cp-Nets. In: Fürnkranz, J., Hüllermeier, E. (eds.) To appear in the Book Preference Learning. Springer, HeidelbergGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Middleton, S.E., Shadbolt, N., Roure, D.D.: Capturing Interest through Inference and Visualization: Ontological User Profiling in Recommender Systems. In: K-CAP 2003 (2003)Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    de Baets, B., Fodor, J.C.: Twenty Years of Fuzzy Preference Structures (1978–1997). Decisions in Economics and Finance 20, 45–66 (1997)MATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Fagin, R., Lotem, A., Naor, M.: Optimal Aggregation Algorithms for Middleware. In: Proceedings of Twentieth ACM Symposium on Principles of Database Systems (PODS 2001), pp. 102–113. ACM, New York (2001)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Clemen, R.T.: Making Hard Decisions: an Introduction to Decision Analysis. Duxbury Press, Belmont (1996)Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Eckhardt, A., Vojtáš, P.: How to Learn Fuzzy User Preferences with Variable Objectives. In: Proceedings of 2009 IFSA World Congress/EUSFLAT Conference, Lisbon, Portugal, July 2009, pp. 938–943 (2009)Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Eckhardt, A., Vojtáš, P.: Considering Data-Mining Techniques in User Preference Learning. In: 2008 International Workshop on Web Information Retrieval Support Systems, pp. 33–36 (2008)Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Eckhardt, A.: Inductive Models of User Preferences for Semantic Web. In: Pokorný, J., Snášel, V., Richta, K. (eds.) DATESO 2007. CEUR Workshop Proceedings, vol. 235, pp. 108–119. Matfyz Press, Praha (2007)Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Witten, I.H., Frank, E.: Data Mining: Practical Machine Learning Tools and Techniques, 2nd edn. Morgan Kaufmann, San Francisco (2005)MATHGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2010

Authors and Affiliations

  • Alan Eckhardt
    • 1
    • 2
  • Peter Vojtáš
    • 1
    • 2
  1. 1.Department of Software EngineeringCharles University 
  2. 2.Institute of Computer ScienceCzech Academy of SciencePragueCzech Republic

Personalised recommendations