Animation as an Aid for Higher Education Computing Teaching

  • Mark Taylor
  • David Pountney
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 5940)


Undergraduate computing courses now cover aspects of computing ranging from the more formal computer science and software engineering, through traditional computer studies and information systems to multimedia courses and more recently specialist areas such as computer games, computer animation and computer forensics. In this paper we examine the potential use of animation for supporting teaching on the range of computing courses currently available within UK higher education. Experiments were conducted with groups of UK undergraduate computing students to compare the perceived usefulness of animated and static learning materials for teaching computing concepts such as diagrammatical design techniques, computer games development techniques and the mathematical techniques underpinning multimedia development. Overall animated learning materials appeared to be perceived as being more useful to undergraduate computing students than traditional static learning materials for learning such concepts.


Computing teaching animation 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. 1.
    Schaefer, S., Warren, J.: Teaching computer game design and construction. Computer Aided Design 36(14), 1501–1510 (2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Callan, R.: Mathematics for computing. Letts Educational, London (1998)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Lengyel, E.: Mathematics for 3D game programming and computer graphics. Charles River Media, Hingham (2002)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Mustoe, L., Barry, M.: Mathematics in Engineering and Science. John Wiley and Sons, Chichester (1998)zbMATHGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Davies, G., Hicks, G.: Mathematics for scientific and technical students. Longman, Harlow (1998)zbMATHGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    CCTA: SSADM 4+ Reference Manual, CCTA. NCC Blackwell, Oxford (1995)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Flash: Flash animation tool, Adobe Systems Incorporated (2008),
  8. 8.
    Mohler, J.: Flash MX: graphics, animation and interactivity. Delmar Learning, Clifton Park (2002)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Brisbourne, M., Chin, S., Melnyk, E., Begg, D.: Using web-based animations to teach histology. The Anatomical Record 269, 11–19 (2002)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Taylor, M.J., Pountney, D., Malabar, I.: Animation as an aid for the teaching of mathematical concepts. Journal of Further and Higher Education 31(3), 249–261 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Taylor, M.J., Duffy, S., Hughes, G.: The use of animation in higher education to support students with dyslexia. Education and Training 49(1), 25–35 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Taylor, M.J., Pountney, D., Baskett, M.: Using animation to support the teaching of computer game development techniques. Computers and Education 50(4), 1258–1268 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Tversky, B., Morrison, J., Betrancourt, M.: Animation: Can it facilitate? International Journal of Human-Computer Studies 57, 247–262 (2002)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Byrne, M., Catrambone, R., Stasko, T.: Evaluating animations as student aids in learning computer algorithms. Computers and Education 33, 253–278 (1999)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Khalil, M., Johnson, T., Lamar, C.: Comparison of computer based and paper based imagery strategies in learning anatomy. Clinical Anatomy 18, 457–464 (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Stoffa, V.: Modelling and simulation as a recognizing method in education. Educational Media International 41(1), 51–58 (2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    McGrath, M., Brown, J.: Visual learning for science and engineering. IEEE Computer Graphics and Applications 25(5), 56–63 (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Mayer, R.: The promise of multimedia learning: using the same instructional design methods across different media. Learning and Instruction 13(2), 125–139 (2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Michas, I., Berry, D.: Learning a procedural task: effectiveness of multimedia presentations. Applied Cognitive Psychology 14, 555–575 (2000)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Park, O., Gittelman, S.: Dynamic characteristics of mental models and dynamic visual displays. Instructional Science 23, 303–320 (1995)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Philpot, T., Hall, R., Hubing, N., Flori, R., Oglesby, D., Vikas, Y.: Animated instructional media for stress transformations in a mechanics of materials course. Computer Applications in Engineering 11(1), 40–52 (2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    James-Gordon, Y., Bal, J.: Learning style preferences of engineers in automotive design. Journal of Workplace Learning 13(6), 239–245 (2001)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Mathewson, J.: Visual-Spatial thinking: An aspect of science overlooked by educators. Science Education 83(1), 33–54 (1999)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Guimaraes, L., Barbastefano, R., Belfort, E.: Tools for teaching mathematics: A case for Java and VRML. Computer Applications in Engineering Education 8(3), 157–161 (2000)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Mayer, R.: Multimedia learning: are we asking the right questions? Educational Psychologist 32(1), 1–19 (1997)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Paivio, A.: Mental representations: a dual coding approach. Oxford University Press, New York (1990)Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    Leishman, D.: Visual literacy and learning: finding some online territories for the slow learner. On the Horizon 12(1), 26–30 (2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Albalooshi, F., Alkhalifa, E.: Multimedia as a cognitive tool. Educational Technology and Society 5(4), 49–55 (2002)Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    Koschke, R.: Software visualization in software maintenance, reverse engineering, and re-engineering: a research survey. Journal of Software Maintenance and Evolution: Research and Practice 15, 87–109 (2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Mayer, R., Moreno, R.: Animation as an aid to multimedia learning. Educational Psychology Review 14(1), 87–99 (2002)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Lowe, R.: Extracting information from an animation during complex visual learning. European Journal of Psychology in Education 14, 225–244 (1999)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Tall, D.: Intuition and rigour: the role of visualization in mathematics In: Zimmerman, W., Cunningham, S. (eds.) Mathematical Association of America Notes, vol. 19, pp. 105–119 (1991)Google Scholar
  33. 33.
    Faraday, P., Sutcliffe, A.: Designing effective multimedia presentations. In: Proceedings of the ACM SIGCHI 1997 Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, pp. 272–278 (1997)Google Scholar
  34. 34.
    Rieber, L.: Animation in computer-based instruction. Educational technology research and development 38, 77–87 (1990)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Passerini, K., Granger, M.: Integration of instructional approaches through media combination in an undergraduate information systems course. Campus-Wide Information Systems 16(5), 162–170 (1999)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Large, A., Beheshti, J., Breuleux, A., Renaud, A.: Multimedia and comprehension: The relationship among text, animation and captions. Journal of the American Society for Information 46(5), 340–347 (1995)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Blackboard: Blackboard Academic Suite, Blackboard Inc., Washington, DC, USA (2008),
  38. 38.
    LaMothe, A.: Tricks of the Windows game programming gurus. Sams Publishing, Indianapolis (2002)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2009

Authors and Affiliations

  • Mark Taylor
    • 1
  • David Pountney
    • 1
  1. 1.School of Computing and Mathematical SciencesLiverpool John Moores UniversityLiverpoolUK

Personalised recommendations