Advertisement

Adaptive Serious Games Using Agent Organizations

  • Joost Westra
  • Hado van Hasselt
  • Frank Dignum
  • Virginia Dignum
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 5920)

Abstract

Increasing complexity in serious games and the need to reuse and adapt games to different purposes and different user needs, requires distributed development approaches. The use of software agents has been advocated as a means to deal with the complexity of serious games. Current approaches to dynamic adjustability in games make it possible for different elements to adjust to the player. However, these approaches most use centralized control, which becomes impractical if the complexity and the number of adaptable elements increase. The serious games we are investigating are constructed using complex and independent subtasks that influence each other. In this paper, we propose a model for game adaptation that is guided by three main concerns: the trainee, the game objectives and the agents. In particular we focus on how the adaptation engine determines tasks to be adapted and how agents respond to such requests and modify their plans accordingly.

Keywords

Skill Level User Model Game Model Task Selection Combinatorial Auction 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Andrade, G., Ramalho, G., Gomes, A.S., Corruble, V.: Dynamic game balancing: An evaluation of user satisfaction. In: Laird, J.E., Schaeffer, J. (eds.) AIIDE, pp. 3–8. The AAAI Press, Menlo Park (2006)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Andrade, G., Ramalho, G., Santana, H., Corruble, V.: Extending Reinforcement Learning to Provide Dynamic Game Balancing. Reasoning, Representation, and Learning in Computer Games (2005)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Brusk, J., Lager, T., Hjalmarsson, A., Wik, P.: Deal: dialogue management in SCXML for believable game characters. In: Future Play 2007: Proceedings of the 2007 conference on Future Play, pp. 137–144. ACM, New York (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Dastani, M.M., Meyer, J.-J.C.: A practical agent programming language. In: Dastani, M.M., El Fallah Seghrouchni, A., Ricci, A., Winikoff, M. (eds.) ProMAS 2007. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 4908, pp. 107–123. Springer, Heidelberg (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Dignum, V.: A Model for Organizational Interaction: based on Agents, founded in Logic. SIKS Dissertation, seriesGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Hunicke, R., Chapman, V.: AI for Dynamic Difficulty Adjustment in Games. In: Proceedings of the Challenges in Game AI Workshop, Nineteenth National Conference on Artificial Intelligence, AAAI 2004 (2004)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Kok, E.: Learning Effective Rule Selection in 2APL Agents. Technical report, Master thesis, Utrecht UniversityGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Lees, M., Logan, B., Theodoropoulos, G.: Agents, Computer Games and HLA. International Journal of Simulation Systems, Science and TechnologyGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Moffat, D.: Personality parameters and programs. In: Petta, P., Trappl, R. (eds.) Creating Personalities for Synthetic Actors. LNCS, vol. 1195, pp. 120–165. Springer, Heidelberg (1997)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Rabin, S.: AI Game Programming Wisdom. Charles River Media (2002)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Sandholm, T.: Algorithm for optimal winner determination in combinatorial auctions. Artificial Intelligence 135(1-2), 1–54 (2002)zbMATHCrossRefMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Schurr, N., Marecki, J., Lewis, J.P., Tambe, M., Scerri, P.: The DEFACTO system: Training tool for incident commanders. In: Veloso, M.M., Kambhampati, S. (eds.) AAAI, pp. 1555–1562. AAAI Press / The MIT Press (2005)Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Silverman, B., Bharathy, G., O’Brien, K., Cornwell, J.: Human behavior models for agents in simulators and games: part II: gamebot engineering with PMFserv. Presence: Teleoperators and Virtual Environments 15(2), 163–185 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Spronck, P., Ponsen, M., Sprinkhuizen-Kuyper, I., Postma, E.: Adaptive game AI with dynamic scripting (2006)Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Westra, J., Dignum, F., Dignum, V.: Modeling agent adaptation in games. In: Proceedings of OAMAS 2008 (2008)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2009

Authors and Affiliations

  • Joost Westra
    • 1
  • Hado van Hasselt
    • 1
  • Frank Dignum
    • 1
  • Virginia Dignum
    • 1
  1. 1.Universiteit Utrecht 

Personalised recommendations