Advertisement

Gaia Agents Implementation through Models Transformation

  • Nikolaos Spanoudakis
  • Pavlos Moraitis
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 5925)

Abstract

Gaia is a well-known Agent Oriented Software Engineering (AOSE) methodology. The emerging Model-Driven Engineering (MDE) paradigm encourages software modelers to automate the transition of one type of software model to another and eventually the code generation process. Towards this end we define a process for transforming the Gaia roles model liveness formulas to statecharts. This achievement on one hand allows the modeler to work on detailed agent design and permits, on the other hand, to automatically generate an agent’s code using any one of the statecharts-based tools in the market.

Keywords

Agent Oriented Software Engineering Statecharts Gaia methodology Model Driven Engineering 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Budinsky, F., Steinberg, D., Ellersick, R., Merks, E., Brodsky, S.A., Grose, T.J.: Eclipse Modeling Framework. Addison Wesley, Reading (2003)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    David, A., Deneux, J., d’Orso, J.: A Formal Semantics for UML Statecharts. Technical Report 2003-010, Uppsala University (2003)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    García-Magariño, I., Gómez-Sanz, J.J., Fuentes-Fernández, R.: Model Transformations for Improving Multi-agent Systems Development in INGENIAS. In: 10th International Workshop on Agent-Oriented Software Engineering (AOSE 2009), Budapest Hungary (2009)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Gerber, A., Raymond, K.: MOF to EMF: there and back again. In: Proceedings of the 2003 OOPSLA workshop on eclipse technology eXchange (Eclipse 2003), pp. 60–64. ACM Press, New York (2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Harel, D., Kugler, H.: The RHAPSODY Semantics of Statecharts (Or on the Executable Core of the UML). In: Ehrig, H., Damm, W., Desel, J., Große-Rhode, M., Reif, W., Schnieder, E., Westkämper, E. (eds.) INT 2004. LNCS, vol. 3147, pp. 325–354. Springer, Heidelberg (2004)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Jouault, F., Bézivin, J.: KM3: A DSL for Metamodel Specification. In: Gorrieri, R., Wehrheim, H. (eds.) FMOODS 2006. LNCS, vol. 4037, pp. 171–185. Springer, Heidelberg (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Kleppe, A., Warmer, S., Bast, W.: MDA Explained. The Model Driven Architecture: Practice and Promise. Addison-Wesley, Reading (2003)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Mikk, E., Lakhnech, Y., Petersohn, C., Siegel, M.: On formal semantics of Statecharts as supported by STATEMATE. In: Proceedings of the second BCS-FACS Northern Formal Methods Workshop. Springer, Heidelberg (1997)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Moraitis, P., Spanoudakis, N.: The Gaia2JADE Process for Multi-Agent Systems Development. J. Appl. Artif. Intell. 20(2-4), 251–273 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Object Management Group: Meta Object Facility (MOF) Core Specification (2001) Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Object Management Group: Human-Usable Textual Notation V1.0 (2004)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    openArchitectureWare (oAW), http://www.openarchitectureware.org/
  13. 13.
    Perini, A., Susi, A.: Automating Model Transformations in Agent-Oriented Modeling. In: Müller, J.P., Zambonelli, F. (eds.) AOSE 2005. LNCS, vol. 3950, pp. 167–178. Springer, Heidelberg (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Rose, L.M., Paige, R.F., Kolovos, D.S., Polack, F.A.C.: Constructing models with the Human-Usable Textual Notation. In: Czarnecki, K., Ober, I., Bruel, J.-M., Uhl, A., Völter, M. (eds.) MODELS 2008. LNCS, vol. 5301, pp. 249–263. Springer, Heidelberg (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Rosen, H.K.: Discreet Mathematics and its Applications, 4th edn. McGraw Hill, New York (1999)Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Russel, S., Norvig, P.: Artificial Intelligence a Modern Approach, 2nd edn. Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs (2003)Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Sendall, S., Kozaczynski, W.: Model Transformation: The Heart and Soul of Model-Driven Software Development. IEEE Softw. 20(5), 42–45 (2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Spanoudakis, N., Moraitis, P.: Automated Product Pricing Using Argumentation. In: Proceedings of the 5th IFIP Conference on Artificial Intelligence Applications & Innovations (AIAI 2009), Springer, Heidelberg (2009)Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Zambonelli, F., Jennings, N.R., Wooldridge, M.: Developing multiagent systems: the Gaia Methodology. ACM T. Softw. Eng. Meth. 12(3), 317–370 (2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2009

Authors and Affiliations

  • Nikolaos Spanoudakis
    • 1
    • 2
  • Pavlos Moraitis
    • 2
  1. 1.Dept of SciencesTechnical University of CreteChaniaGreece
  2. 2.Laboratory of Informatics Paris Descartes (LIPADE)Paris Descartes UniversityParis Cedex 06France

Personalised recommendations