Subsidized Prediction Markets for Risk Averse Traders

  • Stanko Dimitrov
  • Rahul Sami
  • Marina Epelman
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 5929)

Abstract

In this paper we study the design and characterization of prediction markets in the presence of traders with unknown risk-aversion. We formulate a series of desirable properties for any “market-like” forecasting mechanism. We present a randomized mechanism that satisfies all these properties while guaranteeing that it is myopically optimal for each trader to trade honestly, regardless of her degree of risk aversion. We observe, however, that the mechanism has an undesirable side effect: the traders’ expected reward, normalized against the inherent value of their private information, decreases exponentially with the number of traders. We prove that this is unavoidable: any mechanism that is myopically strategyproof for traders of all risk types, while also satisfying other natural properties of “market-like” mechanisms, must sometimes result in a player getting an exponentially small normalized expected reward.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Agrawal, S., Delage, E., Peters, M., Wang, Z., Ye, Y.: A unified framework for dynamic pari-mutuel information market design. In: EC 2009: Proceedings of the tenth ACM conference on Electronic commerce, pp. 255–264. ACM, New York (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Allen, F.: Discovering personal probabilities when utility functions are unknown. Management Science 33(4), 542–544 (1987)CrossRefMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Brier, G.W.: Verification of forecasts expressed in terms of probability. Monthly Weather Review 78(1), 1–3 (1950)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Chen, K.-Y., Fine, L.R., Huberman, B.A.: Forecasting uncertain events with small groups. In: Proceedings of the Third ACM Conference on Electronic Commerce (EC 2001), Tampa, Florida, pp. 58–64 (2001)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Chen, Y., Pennock, D.M.: A utility framework for bounded-loss market makers. In: Proceedings of the 23rd Conference on Uncertainty in Artificial Intelligence (UAI 2007), pp. 49–56 (2007)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Chen, Y., Dimitrov, S., Sami, R., Reeves, D., Pennock, D., Hanson, R., Fortnow, L., Gonen, R.: Gaming prediction markets: Equilibrium strategies with a market maker. AlgorithmicaGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Dimitrov, S., Sami, R., Epelman, M.: Subsidized prediction markets for risk averse traders (2009) (manuscript), http://www.umich.edu/~rsami/papers/RiskAverseMarkets.pdf
  8. 8.
    Hanson, R.: Combinatorial information market design. Information Systems Frontiers 5(1), 107–119 (2003)CrossRefMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Lambert, N.S., Langford, J., Wortman, J., Chen, Y., Reeves, D., Shoham, Y., Pennock, D.M.: Self-financed wagering mechanisms for forecasting. In: EC 2008: Proceedings of the 9th ACM conference on Electronic commerce, pp. 170–179. ACM, New York (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Offerman, T., Sonnemans, J., van de Kuilen, G., Wakker., P.P.: A truth-serum for non-bayesians: Correcting proper scoring rules for risk attitudes. Working paper (June 2008), http://www1.fee.uva.nl/creed/pdffiles/propscr30jun08.pdf
  11. 11.
    Pennock, D.M.: A dynamic pari-mutuel market for hedging, wagering, and information aggregation. In: EC 2004: Proceedings of the 5th ACM conference on Electronic commerce, pp. 170–179. ACM Press, New York (2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Winkler, R.L., Murphy, A.H.: Nonlinear utility and the probability score. Journal of Applied Meteorology 9, 143–148 (1970)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2009

Authors and Affiliations

  • Stanko Dimitrov
    • 1
  • Rahul Sami
    • 2
  • Marina Epelman
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Industrial and Operations Engineering 
  2. 2.School of InformationUniversity of MichiganAnn Arbor

Personalised recommendations