Abstract
Dimensionality reduction aims to represent higher dimensional data by a lower-dimensional structure. A well-known approach by Carroll, Parametric Mapping (PARAMAP) (Shepard and Carroll 1966) relies on iterative minimization of a loss function (called kappa or “κ”) measuring the smoothness or continuity of the mapping from the lower dimensional representation to the original data. The approach was resuscitated recently with important algorithmic modifications (Akkucuk 2004; Akkucuk and Carroll 2003, 2006). However improved, the approach still involved the need to make a large number of random starts. In this paper we discuss the use of a variant of the Isomap method (Tenenbaum et al. 2000) to obtain a starting framework, consisting of a core set of landmark points. These core set of landmark points are used to construct a rational start for running PARAMAP algorithm only once. Since Isomap is faster and less prone to local optimum problems than PARAMAP, and the iterative process involved in adding new points to the configuration will be less time consuming (since only one starting configuration is used), we believe the resulting method should be better suited to deal with large sets of realistically based data, and more inclined to obtain a satisfactory solution in reasonable time.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
Buying options
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Learn about institutional subscriptionsPreview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Akkucuk, U. (2004). Nonlinear mapping: Approaches based on optimizing an index of continuity and applying classical metric MDS to revised distances (Doctoral dissertation, Rutgers University, Newark, NJ, 2004). University Microfilms No. AAT 3148774.
Akkucuk, U., & Carroll, J. D. (2003). Nonlinear mapping: Approaches based on optimizing an index of continuity and applying classical metric mds to revised distances. Paper presented at DIMACS working group meeting, Tallahassee, Florida.
Akkucuk, U., & Carroll, J. D. (2006). PARAMAP vs. isomap: A comparison of two nonlinear mapping algorithms. Journal of Classification, 23, 221–254.
Balasubramanian, M., Schwartz, E. L., Tenenbaum, J. B., DeSilva, V., & Langford, J. C. (2002). The isomap algorithm and topological stability. Science, 295, 7a.
Shepard, R. N., & Carroll, J. D. (1966). Parametric representation of nonlinear data structures. In P. R. Krishnaiah (Ed.), Multivariate Analysis (pp. 561–592). New York: Academic Press.
Tenenbaum, J. B., DeSilva, V., & Langford, J. C. (2000). A global geometric framework for nonlinear dimensionality reduction. Science, 290, 2319–2323.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2010 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg
About this paper
Cite this paper
Akkucuk, U., Carroll, J.D. (2010). Nonlinear Mapping Using a Hybrid of PARAMAP and Isomap Approaches. In: Locarek-Junge, H., Weihs, C. (eds) Classification as a Tool for Research. Studies in Classification, Data Analysis, and Knowledge Organization. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-10745-0_40
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-10745-0_40
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg
Print ISBN: 978-3-642-10744-3
Online ISBN: 978-3-642-10745-0
eBook Packages: Mathematics and StatisticsMathematics and Statistics (R0)