Improving Prediction Interval Quality: A Genetic Algorithm-Based Method Applied to Neural Networks

  • Abbas Khosravi
  • Saeid Nahavandi
  • Doug Creighton
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 5864)


The delta technique has been proposed in literature for constructing prediction intervals for targets estimated by neural networks. Quality of constructed prediction intervals using this technique highly depends on neural network characteristics. Unfortunately, literature is void of information about how these dependences can be managed in order to optimize prediction intervals. This study attempts to optimize length and coverage probability of prediction intervals through modifying structure and parameters of the underlying neural networks. In an evolutionary optimization, genetic algorithm is applied for finding the optimal values of network size and training hyper-parameters. The applicability and efficiency of the proposed optimization technique is examined and demonstrated using a real case study. It is shown that application of the proposed optimization technique significantly improves quality of constructed prediction intervals in term of length and coverage probability.


Neural network genetic algorithm prediction interval 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. 1.
    Paliwal, M., Kumar, U.A.: Neural networks and statistical techniques: A review of applications. Expert Systems with Applications 36, 2–17 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Hannula, M., Huttunen, K., Koskelo, J., Laitinen, T., Leino, T.: Comparison between artificial neural network and multilinear regression models in an evaluation of cognitive workload in a flight simulator. Computers in Biology and Medicine 38, 1163–1170 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Hwang, J.T.G., Ding, A.A.: Prediction Intervals for Artificial Neural Networks. Journal of the American Statistical Association 92, 748–757 (1997)MATHCrossRefMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    de Veaux, R.D., Schumi, J., Jason, S., Ungar, L.H.: Prediction Intervals for Neural Networks via Nonlinear Regression. Technometrics 40, 273–282 (1998)MATHCrossRefMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Nix, D.A., Weigend, A.S.: Estimating the mean and variance of the target probability distribution. In: IEEE International Conference on Neural Networks (1994)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Papadopoulos, G., Edwards, P.J., Murray, A.F.: Confidence estimation methods for neural networks: a practical comparison. IEEE Transactions on Neural Networks 12, 1278–1287 (2001)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Khosravi, A., Nahavandi, S., Creighton, D.: Constructing Prediction Intervals for Neural Network Metamodels of Complex Systems. In: International Joint Conference on Neural Networks, IJCNN 2009 (2009)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Khosravi, A., Nahavandi, S., Creighton, D.: A Prediction Interval-Based Approach to Determine Optimal Structures of Neural Network Metamodels. Expert Systems with Applications (August 2009) (in Press) (accepted Manuscript)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Seber, G.A.F., Wild, C.J.: Nonlinear regression. Wiley, New York (1989)MATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Lu, T., Viljanen, M.: Prediction of indoor temperature and relative humidity using neural network models: model comparison. Neural Computing & Applications 18, 345–357 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Gen, M., Cheng, R.: Genetic algorithms and engineering design. Wiley, New York (1997)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Haupt, R.L., Haupt, S.E.: Practical genetic algorithms. Wiley, New York (1998)MATHGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Vonk, E., Jain, L.C., Johnson, R.P.: Automatic generation of neural network architecture using evolutionary computation. World Scientific, Singapore (1997)MATHGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Bornholdt, S., Graudenz, D.: General asymmetric neural networks and structure design by genetic algorithms. Neural Networks 5, 327–334 (1992)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Asuncion, A., Newman, D.J.: UCI Machine Learning Repository, Irvine, CA, University of California, School of Information and Computer Science (2009),

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2009

Authors and Affiliations

  • Abbas Khosravi
    • 1
  • Saeid Nahavandi
    • 1
  • Doug Creighton
    • 1
  1. 1.Centre for Intelligent Systems Research (CISR)Deakin UniversityGeelongAustralia

Personalised recommendations