Advertisement

Determination of a Gravimetric Geoid Model of Greece Using the Method of KTH

  • I. DarasEmail author
  • H. Fan
  • K. Papazissi
  • J. D. Fairhead
Conference paper
Part of the International Association of Geodesy Symposia book series (IAG SYMPOSIA, volume 135)

Abstract

The main purpose of this study is to compute a gravimetric geoid model of Greece using the least squares modification method developed at KTH. In regional gravimetric geoid determination, the modified Stokes’ formula that combines local terrestrial data with a global geopotential model is often used nowadays. In this study, the optimum modification of Stokes’ formula, introduced by Sjöberg (2003), is employed so that the expected mean square error (MSE) of the combined geoid height is minimized. According to this stochastic method, the geoid height is first computed from modified Stokes’ formula using surface gravity data and a global geopotential model (GGM). The precise geoid height is then obtained by adding the topographic, downward continuation, atmospheric and ellipsoidal corrections to the approximate geoid height. In this study the downward continuation correction was not considered for the precise geoid height computations due to a limited DEM. The dataset used for the computations, consisted of terrestrial gravimetric measurements, a DEM model and GPS/Levelling data for the Greek region. Three global geopotential models (EGM96, EIGEN-GRACE02S, EIGEN-GL04C) were tested for choosing the best GGM to be combined into the final solution. Regarding the evaluation and refinement of the terrestrial gravity measurements, the cross-validation technique has been used for detection of outliers. The new Greek gravimetric geoid model was evaluated with 18 GPS/Levelling points of the Greek geodetic network. After using a 7-parameter model to fit the geoid model to the GPS/Levelling data, the agreement between the absolute geoid heights derived from the gravimetric method and the GPS/Levelling data, was estimated to 27 cm while the agreement for the relative geoid heights after the fitting, to 0.9 ppm. In an optimal case study, considering the accuracies of the ellipsoidal and orthometric heights as \(\sigma _h \approx \pm 10\,{\textrm{cm}}\) and \(\sigma _H \approx \pm 20\,{\textrm{cm}}\) respectively, the RMS fit of the model with the GPS/Levelling data was estimated to \(\sigma _N \approx \pm 15\,{\textrm{cm}}\). The geoid model computed in this study was also compared with some previous Greek geoid models, yielding better external accuracy than them.

Keywords

Gravity Anomaly Geoid Height Geoid Model Spherical Harmonic Coefficient Orthometric Height 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

References

  1. Daras, I. (2008). Determination of a gravimetric geoid model of Greece using the method of KTH. Master of science thesis in Geodesy No.3102, ISSN 1653-5227, Royal Institute of Technology, Stockholm.Google Scholar
  2. Ellmann, A. (2005). Computation of three stochastic modifications of Stokes’s formula for regional geoid determination. Comput. Geosci., 31/6, 742–755.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Fan, H. (1998). On an Earth ellipsoid best-fitted to the Earth surface. J. Geod, 72(3), 154–160.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. GETECH (2007). Gravity point data for Greece, Geophysical Exploration Technology (GETECH), University of Leeds.Google Scholar
  5. Heiskanen, W.A. and H. Moritz (1967). Physical Geodesy. W H Freeman and Co., New York, London and San Francisco.Google Scholar
  6. Hellenic Military Geographical Service, Mylona (2005). The geoid model of Greece in WGS84, combined by GPS and gravity measurements. Vol. 152, Publication 2003–2005.Google Scholar
  7. Kotsakis, C. and M.G. Sideris (1999). On the adjustment of combined GPS/levelling/geoid networks. J. Geod., 73(8), 412–421.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Moritz, H. (1980). Advanced physical geodesy, Herbert Wichmann Verlag, Karlsruhe.Google Scholar
  9. Rapp, R.H. and N.K. Pavlis (1990). The development and analysis of geopotential coefficients models to spherical harmonic degree 360. J. Geophys. Res., 95(B13), 21885–21911.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Sjöberg, L.E. (1984). Least squares modification of Stokes’ and Vening Meinesz’ formulas by accounting for truncation and potential coefficient errors. Manuscripta Geodaetica, 9, 209–229.Google Scholar
  11. Sjöberg, L.E. (1991). Refined least squares modification of Stokes’ formula. Manuscripta Geodaetica, 16, 367–375.Google Scholar
  12. Sjöberg, L.E. (2000). On the topographic effects by the Stokes-Helmert method of geoid and quasi-geoid determinations. J. Geod., 74(2), 255–268.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Sjöberg, L.E. (2001). Topographic and atmospheric corrections of gravimetric geoid determination with special emphasis on the effects of degree zero and one. J. Geod., 75, 283–290.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Sjöberg, L.E. (2003). A general model of modifying Stokes’ formula and its least squares solution. J. Geod., 77, 459–464.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Sjöberg, L.E. (2004). A spherical harmonic representation of the ellipsoidal correction to the modified Stokes formula. J. Geod., 78(3), 1432–1394.Google Scholar
  16. Sjöberg, L.E. and H. Nahavandchi (2000). The atmospheric geoid effects in Stokes’ formula. Geophys. J. Int., 140, 95–100.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Tscherning, C. and R. Rapp (1974). Closed covariance expressions for gravity anomalies, geoid undulations and deflections of the vertical implied by anomaly degree variance models. Report No. 208, Department of Geodetic Science, Ohio State University, Columbus, OH.Google Scholar
  18. Tziavos, I.N. (1984). A study of optimum combination of heterogeneous data for the determination of the geoid: A case study of Greece (PhD Dissertation). Thessaloniki, Greece.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2010

Authors and Affiliations

  • I. Daras
    • 1
    Email author
  • H. Fan
    • 2
  • K. Papazissi
    • 3
  • J. D. Fairhead
    • 4
  1. 1.Rural and Surveying Engineering Dept.National Technical University of AthensAthensGreece
  2. 2.Department of GeodesySchool of Architecture and the Built Environment, Royal Institute of Technology (KTH)StockholmSweden
  3. 3.Department of TopographySchool of Rural and Surveying Engineering, National Technical University of Athens (NTUA)AthensGreece
  4. 4.Department of Earth SciencesGETECH-University of LeedsLeedsUK

Personalised recommendations