Advertisement

Covariance Propagation of Latitude-Dependent Orbit Errors Within the Energy Integral Approach

  • H. Goiginger
  • R. Pail
Conference paper
Part of the International Association of Geodesy Symposia book series (IAG SYMPOSIA, volume 135)

Abstract

The satellite mission GOCE (Gravity and steady-state Ocean Circulation Explorer) has the demanding task to map the Earth’s gravity field with unprecedented accuracy by using state-of-the-art observation technologies. The processing strategy of the orbit data is based on the energy integral approach to determine the long wavelength structure of the gravity field. The final product will consist of the gravity field model in terms of estimated spherical harmonic coefficients and the corresponding error description. The study about covariance propagation of latitude-dependent orbit errors is driven by the fact that the GPS receiver used for GOCE might not have full performance in the case of low-elevation GPS satellites, which might lead to a reduced number of observable satellites in higher latitudes. Therefore, the adjustment procedure is extended by a covariance propagation taking this fact into account. The studies have shown that the consistent error propagation can not significantly improve the coefficient solution itself but it rather provides a correct error description of the result.

Keywords

Gravity field recovery GOCE Energy integral approach Covariance propagation 

References

  1. Bock, H., A. Jäggi, D. Svehla, G. Beutler, U. Hugentobler, and P. Visser (2007). Precise orbit determination for the GOCE satellite using GPS. Adv. Space Res., 39, 1638–1647.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. ESA (1999). Gravity Field and Steady-State Ocean Circulation Explorer Mission. Reports for Mission Selection. The Four Candidate Earth Explorer Core Missions, SP-1233(1), European Space Agency, Noordwijk, The Netherlands.Google Scholar
  3. Goiginger, H. and R. Pail (2006). Investigation of velocities derived from satellite positions in the framework of the energy integral approach. In: Pro. 3rd GOCE User Workshop, ESA SP-627, Frascati, European Space Agency, Noordwijk, The Netherlands, pp. 319–324.Google Scholar
  4. Jandrisevits, C. (2005). Numerische Differentiationsverfahren mit voller Kovarianz-Information im Rahmen der GOCE-Erdschwerefeldlösung. Master thesis, Graz University of Technology.Google Scholar
  5. Jekeli, C. (1999). The determination of gravitational potential differences from satellite-to-satellite tracking. Celestial Mech. Dynamical Astron., 75, 85_101.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Rapp, R.H., Y.M. Wang, and N.K. Pavlis (1991). The Ohio State 1991 geopotential and sea surface topography harmonic coefficient models. Report, The Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio. no. 410.Google Scholar
  7. Rummel, R., T. Gruber, and R. Koop (2004). High level processing facility for GOCE: Products and processing strategy. In: Proc. Second International GOCE User Workshop “GOCE, The Geoid and Oceanography”, ESA SP-569, Frascati, March 2004, European Space Agency, Noordwijk, The Netherlands.Google Scholar
  8. Visser, P.N.A.M., N. Sneeuw, and C. Gerlach (2003). Energy integral method for gravity field determination from satellite orbit coordinates. J. Geodesy, 77, 207–216.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2010

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Institute of Navigation and Satellite Geodesy, Graz University of TechnologyGrazAustria

Personalised recommendations