ISAAC 2009: Algorithms and Computation pp 213-223 | Cite as

Geodesic Spanners on Polyhedral Surfaces

  • Sanjiv Kapoor
  • Xiang-Yang Li
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 5878)

Abstract

In this paper we consider the problem of efficiently constructing geodesic t-spanners. We consider finding sparse spanners on the surface of a 3 dimensional polyhedron allowing for steiner vertices. If Steiner vertices are not allowed, then we establish lower bounds on the maximum node degree, depending on the spanning ratio t and also the total number of vertices of the polyhedron surface. We also consider the case of the surface of a convex polytope \(\mathcal P \) with V vertices. Using its vertex set P and Steiner points, we can construct a t-spanner with a constant degree and weight O(MST(U)), where MST(U) is the minimum spanning tree on the set U of vertices on convex polytope.

Keywords

Geodesic Distance Steiner Point Polyhedral Surface Dilation Factor Span Ratio 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Althofer, I., Das, G., Dopkin, D., Joseph, D., Soares, J.: On sparse spanners of weighted graphs. Discrete and Computational Geometry 9, 81–100 (1993)CrossRefMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Arya, S., Smid, M.: Efficient construction of a bounded degree spanner with low weight. Algorithmica 17, 33–54 (1997)MATHCrossRefMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Chandra, B., Das, G., Narasimhan, G., Soares, J.: New sparseness results on graph spanners. International Journal of Computational Geometry and Applications 5, 125–144 (1995)MATHCrossRefMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Dudley, R.: Metric entropy of some classes of sets with differentiable boundaries. J. Approximation Theory 10(3), 227–236 (1974)MATHCrossRefMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Eppstein, D.: Spanning Trees and Spanners. In: Handbook of Computational Geometry, pp. 425–461. Elsevier Science, Amsterdam (1997)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Gudmundsson, J., Levcopoulos, C., Narasimhan, G.: Improved greedy algorithms for constructing sparse geometric spanners. In: Halldórsson, M.M. (ed.) SWAT 2000. LNCS, vol. 1851, pp. 314–327. Springer, Heidelberg (2000)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Gudmundsson, J., Levcopoulos, C., Narasimhan, G.: Fast greedy algorithms for constructing sparse geometric spanners. SIAM Journal on Computing 31(5) (2002)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Karavelas, M.I., Guibas, L.J.: Static and kinetic geometric spanners with applications. In: Proceeding of the Twelfth Annual Symposium on Discrete algorithms, pp. 168–176 (2001)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Kortsarz, G., Peleg, D.: Generating low-degree 2-spanners. In: Proceedings of the fifth annual ACM-SIAM symposium on Discrete algorithms (2000)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Lanthier, M., Maheshwari, A., Sack, R.J.: Approximating Shortest Paths on Weighted Polyhedral Surfaces. Algorithmica 30(4), 527–562 (2001)MATHCrossRefMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Mitchell, J., Mount, D., Papadimitriou, C.: The discrete geodesic problem. SIAM Journal on Computing 16(4), 647–668 (1987)MATHCrossRefMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Peleg, D., Schaffer, A.: Graph spanners. Journal of Graph Theory 13(1), 99–116 (1989)MATHCrossRefMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Regev, H. The Weight of the Greedy Graph Spanner. Weizmann Institute of Science, Dept. of Applied Mathematics and Computer Science (1995)Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Regev, H.: The weight of the greedy graph spanner. Tech. Rep. CS95-22, 1 (1995)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2009

Authors and Affiliations

  • Sanjiv Kapoor
    • 1
  • Xiang-Yang Li
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Computer ScienceIllinois Institute of TechnologyChicagoUSA

Personalised recommendations