Towards an Integration of Space and Accessibility in Web Personalization

  • Mohamed Ramzi Haddad
  • Hajer Baazaoui
  • Marie Aude Aufaure
  • Christophe Claramunt
  • Yves Lechevallier
  • Henda Ben Ghezala
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 5886)


Web personalization can be seen as an interdisciplinary domain that facilitates interaction between web content and user needs. One of the peculiarities of Web information is that a significant part of the data is georeferenced although this is not completely taken into account by current search and personalization engines. This paper introduces a spatial personalization approach based on a user modeling technique and a measure of spatial accessibility. We develop a personalized accessibility measure whose objective is to predict and evaluate location relevancy, accessibility and associations at the user level. This measure favors delivery of location-based and personalized recommendations.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. 1.
    Makri, M.C., Folkesson, C.: Accessibility measures for analyses of land use and traveling with geographical information systems. In: Proceedings of the 2nd KFB-Research Conference, June 1999, pp. 1–17 (1999)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Handy, S.L., Niemeier, D.A.: Measuring accessibility: an exploration of issues and alternatives. Environment and Planning A 29(7), 1175–1194 (1997)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Batty, M.: A new theory of space syntax. UCL working papers series (75) (2004)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Stan, C., Geertman, M., van Eck, J.R.R.: GIS and models of accessibility potential: An application in planning. International Journal of Geographical Information Systems 9(1), 67–80 (1995)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Song, S.: Some tests of alternative accessibility measures: A population density approach. Land Economics 4, 474–482 (1996)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Pirie, G.H.: Measuring accessibility: a review and proposal. Environment and Planning A 11(3), 299–312 (1979)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Kwan, M.: Space-time and integral measures of individual accessibility: A comparative analysis using a point-based framework. Geographical Analysis 30(3), 191–216 (1998)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Oberg, S.: Methods of describing physical access to supply points. Lund Studies in Geography, Series B, Human Geography 42, 474–482 (1976)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Wachs, M., Kumagai, T.G.: Physical accessibility as a social indicator. Socio-Economic Planning Sciences 7(5), 437–456 (1973)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Black, J., Conroy, M.: Accessibility measures and the social evaluation of urban structure. Environment and Planning A 9, 1013–1031 (1977)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Burnett, P., Hanson, S.: An analysis of travel as an example of complex human behavior in spatially constrained situations. Transportation Research 16, 87–102 (1982)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Sonesson, C.: Evaluations of some exponentially weighted moving average methods. Journal of Applied Statistics 30(10), 1115–1133 (2003)MATHCrossRefMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Kwan, M.P., Hong, X.D.: Network-based constraints-oriented choice set formation using GIS. Geographical Systems 5, 139–162 (1998)Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Ingram, D.: The concept of accessibility: A search for an operational form. Regional Studies 5(2), 101–107 (1971)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Burnett, P.: Spatial constraints-oriented modelling as an alternative approach to movement, microeconomics theory and urban policy. Urban Geography 1, 53–67 (1980)Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Petit, M., Claramunt, C., Ray, C., Calvary, G.: A design process for the development of an interactive and adaptive GIS. In: Bertolotto, M., Ray, C., Li, X. (eds.) W2GIS 2008. LNCS, vol. 5373, pp. 96–106. Springer, Heidelberg (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Mac Aoidh, E., Bertolotto, M., Wilson, D.: Implicit profiling for contextual reasoning about users’ spatial preferences. In: Proceedings of 2nd Workshop on Case Based Reasoning and Context-Awareness, August 2007. CEUR Workshop Proceedings, vol. 271 (2007) ISSN 1613-0073Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Kelly, D., Belkin, N.: Reading time, scrolling and interaction: Exploring implicit sources of user preferences for relevant feedback. ACM Special Interest Group on Information Retrieval, 408–409 (2001)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2009

Authors and Affiliations

  • Mohamed Ramzi Haddad
    • 1
  • Hajer Baazaoui
    • 1
  • Marie Aude Aufaure
    • 2
    • 3
  • Christophe Claramunt
    • 4
  • Yves Lechevallier
    • 2
  • Henda Ben Ghezala
    • 1
  1. 1.Riadi-Gdl LaboratoryENSI TunisLa ManoubaTunisia
  2. 2.INRIA-RocquencourtDomaine de VoluceauLe Chesnay CedexFrance
  3. 3.Ecole Centrale Paris, MAS LaboratoryChaire SAP BusinessObjects Grande Voie des VignesChatenay-MalabryFrance
  4. 4.Naval Academy Research InstituteLanvéoc-PoulmicBrest navalFrance

Personalised recommendations