Advertisement

An Affordability Prediction System to Assess Information Availability in Defence Projects

  • Oyetola O. Bankole
  • Rajkumar Roy
  • Essam Shehab
  • Kalyan Cheruvu
Conference paper
Part of the Advances in Intelligent and Soft Computing book series (AINSC, volume 66)

Abstract

The current business environment is increasingly dependent on strategic information and knowledge in order to survive against competition and sustain profitability. The aerospace defence sector is facing the same challenge, because a good level of knowledge is required in making affordability decision in defence contracts, which could last over 30 to 50 years. In this paper, a system which assesses the level of information that is available for both customer and solution provider to decide whether a contract would be affordable across the project life cycle, is presented. It involves a method of score allocation of affordability factors based on affordability elements across the life cycle. The output helps decision makers in negotiating contracts before project starts. It informs contract deliverable by emphasising areas for data collection and indicates the risk involved in a project based on information availability. Further, the paper identifies limitations as well as areas for future improvement.

Keywords

Affordability Affordability Assessment Information Knowledge Defence Industry 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Ackoff, R.L.: From data to wisdom. Journal of Applied Systems Analysis 16, 3–9 (1989)Google Scholar
  2. AOF team, Key Principles for Approvals, Acquisition Operating Framework (2009), http://www.aof.mod.uk/aofcontent/operational/business/approvals/approvals_principles.htm
  3. Bankole, O.O., et al.: Current Practice in Affordability Assessment of Product-Service Systems within the Aerospace and Defence industries. In: CIRP Conference on Industrial Product Service Systems. Cranfield University (2009)Google Scholar
  4. Bierly III, P., et al.: Organisational learning, knowledge and wisdom. Journal of Organizational Change Management 13(6), 595–618 (2000)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Davis, G.B., Olson, M.H.: Management Information Systems: Conceptual Foundations, Structure and Development. McGraw Hill, New York (1985)Google Scholar
  6. Drucker, P.F.: The Coming of the New Organization, Harvard Business Review, January-February 1998, pp. 1–19. Harvard Business School Press, Boston (1998)Google Scholar
  7. Colier, P., Hoeffler, A.: Data Issues in the Study of Conflict. In: Centre for the Study of African Economies (CSAE), Department of Economics at Oxford University (2001), http://www.csae.ox.ac.uk/econdata/pdfs/edds2002-01.pdf (retrieved: 10 June 2009)
  8. Frické, M.: The Knowledge Pyramid: A Critique of the DIKW Hierarchy. Journal of Information Science 35, 131–142 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Hartley, K.: UK Defence Spending, Centre for Defence Economics and Department of Economics and Related Studies (2009), http://www.york.ac.uk/depts/econ/documents/research/rusi.pdf(retrieved: 10 June 2009)
  10. Hartley, K.: The UK Defence Industrial Base: Problems and Prospects. World Defence Systems (2004), http://www.york.ac.uk/depts/econ/documents/research/WDSUKDIB.pdf
  11. Ling, D., et al.: Modelling the Cost of Railway Asset Renewal Projects Using Pairwise Comparisons. Proceedings of Instn. Mech. Engrs (IMechE), Part F: Journal of Rail and Rapid Transit 220, 999–1020 (2006)Google Scholar
  12. Webster, M.: Merriam-Webster Online Dictionary (2009)(retrieved: 10 June 2009)Google Scholar
  13. Nonaka, I.: A dynamic theory of organizational knowledge creation. Organization Science 5, 14–37 (1994)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Ray, A., et al.: Developing a Framework for Affordability Engineering. In: The 4th International Conference on Manufacturing Research (ICMR 2006), 5th – 7th September, pp. 11–16. Liverpool John Moores University (2006)Google Scholar
  15. Roy, R., Cheruvu, K.S.: A competitive framework for Industrial Product Service Systems. International Journal of Internet Manufacturing and Services, Special Issue on Product Service Solutions in Life-Cycle Activities (2009) (Accepted)Google Scholar
  16. Shehab, E., Abdalla, H.: A Cost Effective Knowledge-Based Reasoning System for Design for Automation. Proceedings of Instn. Mech. Engrs. (IMechE), Part B: Journal of Engineering Manufacture 220(5), 729–743 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Tseng, K., et al.: A Web-based Integrated Design System: its applications on Conceptual Design Stage. International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology 35(9-10), 1028–1040 (2008)CrossRefMathSciNetGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2010

Authors and Affiliations

  • Oyetola O. Bankole
    • 1
  • Rajkumar Roy
    • 1
  • Essam Shehab
    • 1
  • Kalyan Cheruvu
    • 1
  1. 1.Decision Engineering Centre, Manufacturing DepartmentCranfield UniversityBedfordUK

Personalised recommendations