The Changing Face of Human-Computer Interaction in the Age of Ubiquitous Computing

  • Yvonne Rogers
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 5889)

Abstract

HCI is reinventing itself. No longer only about being user-centered, it has set its sights on pastures new, embracing a much broader and far-reaching set of interests. From emotional, eco-friendly, embodied experiences to context, constructivism and culture, HCI research is changing apace: from what it looks at, the lenses it uses and what it has to offer. Part of this is as a reaction to what is happening in the world; ubiquitous technologies are proliferating and transforming how we live our lives. We are becoming more connected and more dependent on technology. The home, the crèche, outdoors, public places and even the human body are now being experimented with as potential places to embed computational devices, even to the extent of invading previously private and taboo aspects of our lives. In this paper, I examine the diversity of lifestyle and technological transformations in our midst and outline some ‘difficult’ questions these raise together with alternative directions for HCI research and practice.

Keywords

Human-Computer Interaction Ubiquitous Computing Pervasive Technology Methods Human Values Research Agenda Future Technologies 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Clark, A.: Supersizing the Mind. Oxford University Press, Oxford (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Rogers, Y., Price, S.: How mobile technologies are changing the way children learn. In: Druin, A. (ed.) Mobile Technology For Children, pp. 3–22. Elsevier, Burlington (2009)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Barnard, P.J., May, J., Duke, D.J., Duce, D.A.: Systems interactions and macrotheory. Transactions On Computer Human Interaction 7, 222–262 (2000)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Rogers, Y.: New theoretical approaches for human-computer interaction. Annual Review of Information, Science and Technology 38, 87–143 (2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Rogers, Y.: Is HCI in danger of spiraling out of control? Interactions 64, 8–9 (2005)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Grudin, J.: Is HCI homeless? In search of inter-disciplinary status. Interactions 13(1), 54–59 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Grudin, J.: Living without parental controls: the future of HCI. Interactions 14(2), 48–52 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Harper, R., Rodden, T., Rogers, Y., Sellen, A.: Being human: HCI in the year 2020. Microsoft (2008)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Rogers, Y.: Moving on from Weiser’s vision of calm computing: engaging Ubicomp experiences. In: Dourish, P., Friday, A. (eds.) UbiComp 2006. LNCS, vol. 4206, pp. 404–421. Springer, Heidelberg (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Harrison, S., Tatar, D., Sengers, P.: The three paradigms of HCI. In: CHI 2007. ACM, New York (2007)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Bødker, S.: When second wave HCI meets third wave challenges. In: Mørch, A., Morgan, K., Bratteteig, T., Ghosh, G., Svanaes, D. (eds.) Proceedings of the 4th Nordic Conference on Human-Computer Interaction: Changing Roles, pp. 1–8. ACM, New York (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Ophir, E., Nass, C., Wagner, A.: Cognitive control in media multitaskers. PNAS Early Edition online, www.pnas.org/cgi/10.1073/pnas.0903520106
  13. 13.
    Mancini, C., Thomas, K., Rogers, Y., Price, B.A., Jedrzejczyk, L., Bandara, A., Joinson, A.N., Nuseibeh, B.: From spaces to places: emerging contexts in mobile privacy. In: Ubicomp Proceedings. LNCS, pp. 1–10. Springer, Heidelberg (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Beckwith, R., Lederer, S.: Designing for one’s dotage: UbiComp and residential care facilities. In: Conference on the Networked Home and the Home of the Future, HOIT (2003), www.crito.uci.edu/noah/HOIT
  15. 15.
    Mancini, C., Rogers, Y., Bandara, A., Coe, T., Jedrzejczyk, L., Joinson, A.N., Price, B.A., Thomas, K., Nuseibeh, B.: ContraVision: Widening the spectrum of users’ reactions and concerns to personal technology. Submitted to CHI 2010. ACM, New York (2010)Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Rogers, Y., Muller, H.: A framework for designing sensor-based interactions to promote exploration and reflection. International Journal of Human Computer Studies 64(1), 1–15 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Weiser, M.: The computer for the 21st century. Scientific American 265(3), 94–104 (1991)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Greenfield, A.: Everyware: The Dawning Age of Ubiquitous Computing. New Riders, Berkeley (2006)Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Engelbart, D.C.: Augmenting human intellect: a conceptual framework. SRI Report, AFOSR-3233 (1962)Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Frenkel, K.A.: A difficult, unforgettable idea. CACM 52(3), 21 (2009)Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Bird, J., Holland, S., Marshall, P., Rogers, Y., Clark, A.: Feel the Force: using tactile technologies to investigate the extended mind. In: Proceedings of Devices that Alter Perception (DAP 2008), pp. 1–4 (2008)Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Bird, J., Marshall, P., Rogers, Y.: Low-Fi Skin Vision: A case study in rapid prototyping a sensory substitution system. In: Proceedings of the 23rd Conference on Human Computer Interaction 2009, Cambridge, UK (2009)Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Van der Linden, J., Schoonderwaldt, E., Bird, J.: Towards a real-time system for teaching novices correct violin bowing technique. In: Proceedings of the International Workshop on Haptic Audio-Visual Environments and Games, HAVE, IEEE Instrumentation and Measurements, to be held November 2009, Italy (2009)Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Gigerenzer, G., Todd, P.M., et al.: Simple Heuristics That Make Us Smart. Oxford University Press, New York (1999)Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Todd, P.: How much information do we need? European Journal of Operational Research 177, 1317–1332 (2007)MATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2009

Authors and Affiliations

  • Yvonne Rogers
    • 1
  1. 1.Pervasive Interaction LabOpen UniversityMilton KeynesUK

Personalised recommendations