Advertisement

Regionally Refined Gravity Field Models from In-Situ Satellite Data

  • Annette EickerEmail author
  • Torsten Mayer-Gürr
  • Karl-Heinz Ilk
  • Enrico Kurtenbach
Chapter
Part of the Advanced Technologies in Earth Sciences book series (ATES)

Abstract

The satellite mission GOCE (Gravity field and steady-state Ocean Circulation Explorer) will enable the determination of the Earth’s gravity field with unprecedented accuracy, especially regarding the high-frequency part of the gravity field spectrum. To exploit the full potential of the mission, it is advantageous to develop methods to extract as much information out of the given signal as possible. In the approach presented here a global gravity field represented by a spherical harmonic expansion up to a moderate degree is derived in a first step and then refined by regionally adapted high resolution refinements being parameterized by splines as space localizing basis functions. These radial basis functions are designed to reflect the spectral characteristics of the gravity field to be modeled. Another important aspect in the regional gravity field analysis approach is the downward continuation process. In this context, a regionally adapted regularization will be introduced, which assigns different regularization matrices to geographical areas with varying signal content. Regularization parameters individually determined for each region take into account the varying frequency behavior, allowing to extract additional information out of a given data set. If desired, regional solutions with global coverage can be combined to a global solution using quadrature methods. The approach is demonstrated by a simulation scenario that combines a global GRACE solution as reference field with regional refinements calculated from GOCE observations.

Keywords

GOCE Radial basis functions Regularization Regional solutions 

Notes

Acknowledgements

The support by BMBF (Bundesministerium fuer Bildung und Forschung) and DFG (Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft) within the frame of the Geotechnologien-Programm is gratefully acknowledged.

References

  1. Eicker A, Mayer-Gürr T, Ilk KH (2004) Global gravity field solutions based on a simulation scenario of GRACE SST data and regional refinements by GOCE SGG observations. Proceedings of the International Conference Gravity, Geoid and Space Missions – GGSM2004, 2004 August 30–September 3, Porto, Portugal.Google Scholar
  2. Eicker A (2008) Gravity field refinement by radial basis functions from in-situ satellite data. Dissertation University of Bonn. URN: urn:nbn:de:hbz:5 N–13754, URL: http://hss.ulb.uni-bonn.de/diss_online/landw_fak/2008/eicker_annette.
  3. ESA (1999) Gravity field and steady-state ocean circulation mission. Reports for Mission Selection, ESA, SP-1233(1). European Space Agency Publications Division, Nordwijk.Google Scholar
  4. Freeden W, Gervens T, Schreiner M (1998) Constructive Approximation on the Sphere. Oxford University Press, Oxford.Google Scholar
  5. Koch KR, Kusche J (2001) Regularization of geopotential determination from satellite data by variance components. J. Geod. 76(5), 259–268.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Lemoine FG, Kenyon SC, Factor JK, Trimmer RG, Pavlis DS, Chinn NK, Cox CM, Klosko SM, Luthcke SB, Torrence MH, Wang YM, Williamson RG, Pavlis EC, Rapp RH, Olson TR (1998) The Development of the Joint NASA GSFC and NIMA Geopotential Model EGM96. NASA Goddard Space Flight Cent., Greenbelt, MD.Google Scholar
  7. Mayer-Gürr T (2006) Gravitationsfeldbestimmung aus der Analyse kurzer Bahnbögen am Beispiel der Satellitenmissionen CHAMP und GRACE. Dissertation at the University of Bonn. URN: urn:nbn:de:hbz:5 N–09047, URL: http://hss.ulb.uni-bonn.de/diss_online/landw_fak/2006/mayerguerr_torsten
  8. Rapp RH, Wang YM, Pavlis NK (1991) The Ohio State 1991 geopotential and sea surface topography harmonic coefficient models. Number 410 in Reports of the Department of Geodetic Science. Ohio State University (OSU), Columbus, OH.Google Scholar
  9. Reigber C, Schwintzer P, Lühr H (1999) The CHAMP geopotential mission. Boll. Geof. Teor. Appl. 40, 285–289.Google Scholar
  10. Schmidt M, Fengler M, Mayer-Gürr T, Eicker A, Kusche J, Sanchez L, Han SC (2007) Regional gravity modeling in terms of spherical base functions. J. Geod. 81(1), 17–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Sneeuw N (1994) Global spherical harmonic analysis by least squares and numerical quadrature methods in historical perspective. Geophys. J. Int. 118, 707–716.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Stroud AH, Secrest D (1966) Gaussian Quadrature Formulas. Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ.Google Scholar
  13. Tapley BD, Bettadpur S, Watkins M, Reigber CH (2004) The gravity recovery and climate experiment: mission overview and early results. Geophys. Res. Lett. 31, L09607, doi: 10.1029/2004GL019920.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2010

Authors and Affiliations

  • Annette Eicker
    • 1
    Email author
  • Torsten Mayer-Gürr
    • 1
  • Karl-Heinz Ilk
    • 1
  • Enrico Kurtenbach
    • 1
  1. 1.Institute of Geodesy and Geoinformation, University of BonnBonnGermany

Personalised recommendations