ESAW 2009: Engineering Societies in the Agents World X pp 197-212 | Cite as
Balancing Organizational Regulation and Agent Autonomy: An MDE-Based Approach
Abstract
The deployment of agent societies —as complex systems— in dynamic and unpredictable settings brings forth critical issues concerning their design. Organizational models have been advocated to specify open systems in dynamic environments in order to accomplish the need to represent regulating structures explicitly and independently from acting components (or agents). Despite the fact that several frameworks have been proposed for the specification of organizational models, it is still a matter of design choice how to balance between regulative design and component flexibility.
We propose a design framework, discussing the advantages of having different degrees of abstraction at organizational level in the development of agent societies. That is, we illustrate how the design properties impact the flexibility of run-time systems to cope with context changes. We adopt the OperA software engineering methodology to deal with the organizational model specification, and the Model Driven Engineering (MDE) mechanisms to map concepts between different design models.
Keywords
Organizational Level Organizational Model Context Change Coordination Model Model Drive EngineerPreview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
- 1.Brown, A.W., Conallen, J., Tropeano, D.: Introduction: Models, Modelling and Model Driven Architecture (MDA). Springer, Heidelberg (2005)Google Scholar
- 2.Colman, A., Han, J.: Roles, players and adaptive organisations. Applied Ontology: An Inter. Journal of Ontological Analysis and Conceptual Modeling (2), 105–126 (2007)Google Scholar
- 3.Dastani, M., Dignum, V., Dignum, F.: Role assignment in open agent societies. In: AAMAS 2003. ACM Press, New York (2003)Google Scholar
- 4.Dignum, M., Weigand, H.: I am autonomous, you are autonomous. In: Nickles, M., Rovatsos, M., Weiss, G. (eds.) AUTONOMY 2003. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 2969, pp. 227–236. Springer, Heidelberg (2004)Google Scholar
- 5.Dignum, V.: A Model for Organizational Interaction: based on Agents, founded in Logic. PhD thesis, Universiteit Utrecht (2004)Google Scholar
- 6.Dignum, V., Okouya, D.: Operetta: A prototype tool for the design, analysis and development of multi-agent organizations. In: Proc. AAMAS 2008, Demo Track (2008)Google Scholar
- 7.Grossi, D., Dignum, F., Dignum, V., Dastani, M., Royakkers, L.: Structural aspects of the evaluation of agent organizations. In: Noriega, P., Vázquez-Salceda, J., Boella, G., Boissier, O., Dignum, V., Fornara, N., Matson, E. (eds.) COIN 2006. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 4386, pp. 3–18. Springer, Heidelberg (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 8.Kleppe, A., Warmer, J., Bast, W.: MDA Explained: The Model Driven Architecture—Practice and Promise. Addison-Wesley, Reading (2003)Google Scholar
- 9.Malone, T., Crowston, K.: The interdisciplinary study of coordination. ACM Computing Surveys 26(1) ( March 1994)Google Scholar
- 10.Odell, J., Nodine, M., Levy, R.: A metamodel for agents, roles, and groups. In: Odell, J., Giorgini, P., Müller, J. (eds.) AOSE 2004. LNCS, vol. 3382, pp. 78–92. Springer, Heidelberg (2005)Google Scholar
- 11.Penserini, L., Grossi, D., Dignum, F., Dignum, V., Aldewereld, H.: Evaluating organizational configurations. In: IEEE/WIC/ACM International Conference on Intelligent Agent Technology, IAT 2009 (2009)Google Scholar
- 12.Quillinan, T.B., Brazier, F., Aldewereld, H., Dignum, F., Dignum, V., Penserini, L., Wijngaards, N.: Developing Agent-based Organizational Models for Crisis Management. In: Proc. of the 8th Int. Joint Conf. on Autonomous Agents and Multi-Agent Systems (AAMAS 2009), pp. 45–51. ACM Press, New York (2009)Google Scholar