Advertisement

Trust Based Evaluation of Wikipedia’s Contributors

  • Yann Krupa
  • Laurent Vercouter
  • Jomi Fred Hübner
  • Andreas Herzig
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 5881)

Abstract

Wikipedia is an encyclopedia on which anybody can change its content. Some users, self-proclaimed “patrollers”, regularly check recent changes in order to delete or correct those which are ruining articles integrity. The huge quantity of updates leads some articles to remain polluted a certain time before being corrected. In this work, we show how a multiagent trust model can help patrollers in their task of controlling the Wikipedia. To direct the patrollers verification towards suspicious contributors, our work relies on a formalisation of Castelfranchi & Falcone’s social trust theory to assist them by representing their trust model in a cognitive way.

Keywords

Trust Model Multiagent System Trust Management Trust Assessment Assistant Agent 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Castelfranchi, C., Falcone, R.: Social trust: A cognitive approach. In: Castelfranchi, C., Tan, Y.H. (eds.) Trust and Deception in Virtual Societies, pp. 55–90. Kluwer, Dordrecht (2001)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Viégas, F., Wattenberg, M., McKeon, M.: The hidden order of Wikipedia. In: Schuler, D. (ed.) HCII 2007 and OCSC 2007. LNCS, vol. 4564, pp. 445–454. Springer, Heidelberg (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Grandison, T., Sloman, M.: Trust management tools for internet applications. In: Nixon, P., Terzis, S. (eds.) iTrust 2003. LNCS, vol. 2692, pp. 91–107. Springer, Heidelberg (2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Zacharia, G., Moukas, A., Maes, P.: Collaborative reputation mechanisms in electronic marketplaces. In: Proceedings of the Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (HICSS-32), Maui, Hawaii, United States of America, vol. 08, p. 8026. IEEE Computer Society, Washington (1999)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Sabater-Mir, J., Paolucci, M., Conte, R.: Repage: Reputation and image among limited autonomous partners. Journal of Artificial Societies and Social Simulation 9(2), 3 (2006)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Lorini, E., Herzig, A., Hübner, J.F., Vercouter, L.: A logic of trust and reputation. Logic Journal of the IGPL (2009)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Lorini, E., Demolombe, R.: Trust and norms in the context of computer security: A logical formalization. In: van der Meyden, R., van der Torre, L. (eds.) DEON 2008. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 5076, pp. 50–64. Springer, Heidelberg (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Bordini, R.H., Hübner, J.F., Wooldrige, M.: Programming Multi-Agent Systems in AgentSpeak using Jason. Wiley Series in Agent Technology. John Wiley & Sons, Chichester (2007)zbMATHGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2009

Authors and Affiliations

  • Yann Krupa
    • 1
  • Laurent Vercouter
    • 1
  • Jomi Fred Hübner
    • 1
    • 3
  • Andreas Herzig
    • 2
  1. 1.Département SMAÉcole Nationale Supérieure des Mines de Saint Etienne, Centre G2ISaint-Etienne
  2. 2.Institut de Recherche en Informatique de ToulouseToulouse
  3. 3.Department of Automation and Systems EngineeringFederal University of Santa CatarinaFlorianópolisBrasil

Personalised recommendations