Advertisement

Light Robustness

  • Matteo Fischetti
  • Michele Monaci
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 5868)

Abstract

We consider optimization problems where the exact value of the input data is not known in advance and can be affected by uncertainty. For these problems, one is typically required to determine a robust solution, i.e., a possibly suboptimal solution whose feasibility and cost is not affected heavily by the change of certain input coefficients. Two main classes of methods have been proposed in the literature to handle uncertainty: stochastic programming (offering great flexibility, but often leading to models too large in size to be handled efficiently), and robust optimization (whose models are easier to solve but sometimes lead to very conservative solutions of little practical use). In this paper we investigate a heuristic way to model uncertainty, leading to a modelling framework that we call Light Robustness. Light Robustness couples robust optimization with a simplified two-stage stochastic programming approach, and has a number of important advantages in terms of flexibility and ease to use. In particular, experiments on both random and real word problems show that Light Robustness is sometimes able to produce solutions whose quality is comparable with that obtained through stochastic programming or robust models, though it requires less effort in terms of model formulation and solution time.

Keywords

Robust optimization Stochastic Programming Integer Linear Programming Multi-dimensional Knapsack Train Timetabling 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    El Ghaoui, L., Ben-Tal, A., Nemirovski, A.: Robust Optimization. In: preparation, preliminary draft (2008), http://www2.isye.gatech.edu/~nemirovs/RBnew.pdf
  2. 2.
    Ben-Tal, A., Nemirovski, A.: Robust solutions to uncertain linear programs. Operations Research Letters 25, 1–13 (1999)MATHCrossRefMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Ben-Tal, A., Nemirovski, A.: Robust solutions of linear programming problems contaminated with uncertain data. Mathematical Programming 88, 411–424 (2000)MATHCrossRefMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Ben-Tal, A., Nemirovski, A.: Robust optimization - methodology and applications. Mathematical Programming 92, 453–480 (2002)MATHCrossRefMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Bertsimas, D., Sim, M.: Robust discrete optimization and network flows. Mathematical Programming 98, 49–71 (2003)MATHCrossRefMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Bertsimas, D., Sim, M.: The price of robustness. Operations Research 52, 35–53 (2004)MATHCrossRefMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Bienstock, D.: Histogram models for robust portfolio optimization. The Journal of Computational Finance 11 (2007)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Birge, J.R., Louveaux, F.: Introduction to Stochastic Programming. In: Springer Series in Operations Research and Financial Engineering. Springer, Heidelberg (2000)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Caprara, A., Fischetti, M., Toth, P.: Modeling and solving the train timetabling problem. Operations Research 50, 851–861 (2002)MATHCrossRefMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Fischetti, M., Salvagnin, D., Zanette, A.: Fast approaches to improve the robustness of a railway timetable. Research paper, DEI, University of Padova (2007); to apper in Transportation ScienceGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Kall, P., Wallace, S.W.: Stochastic Programming. Wiley, Chichester (1994)MATHGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Kellerer, H., Pferschy, U., Pisinger, D.: Knapsack Problems. Springer, Berlin (2004)MATHGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Linderoth, J.T., Shapiro, A., Wright, S.J.: The empirical behavior of sampling methods for stochastic programming. Annals of Operations Research 142, 219–245 (2006)CrossRefMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Martello, S., Toth, P.: Knapsack Problems: Algorithms and Computer Implementations. John Wiley & Sons, Chichester (1990)MATHGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Prékopa, A.: Stochastic Programming. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht (1995)Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Ruszczynski, A., Shapiro, A.: Stochastic Programming. In: Hanbooks in Operations Research and Management Science. Elsevier, Amsterdam (2003)Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Serafini, P., Ukovich, W.: A mathematical model for periodic scheduling problems. SIAM Journal on Discrete Mathematics 2, 550–581 (1989)MATHCrossRefMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Soyster, A.L.: Convex programming with set-inclusive constraints and applications to inexact linear programming. Operations Research 21, 1154–1157 (1973)MATHCrossRefMathSciNetGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2009

Authors and Affiliations

  • Matteo Fischetti
    • 1
  • Michele Monaci
    • 1
  1. 1.DEIUniversity of PadovaPadovaItaly

Personalised recommendations