Ontology-Based Retrieval of Spatially Related Objects for Location Based Services

  • Hele-Mai Haav
  • Aivi Kaljuvee
  • Martin Luts
  • Toivo Vajakas
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 5871)

Abstract

Advanced Location Based Service (LBS) applications have to integrate information stored in GIS, information about users’ preferences (profile) as well as contextual information and information about application itself. Ontology engineering provides methods to semantically integrate several data sources. We propose an ontology-driven LBS development framework: the paper describes the architecture of ontologies and their usage for retrieval of spatially related objects relevant to the user. Our main contribution is to enable personalised ontology driven LBS by providing a novel approach for defining personalised semantic spatial relationships by means of ontologies. The approach is illustrated by an industrial case study.

Keywords

Ontology-based information retrieval domain ontology modelling mobile IS personalised LBS semantic LBS 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Open Geospatial Consortium, http://www.opengeospatial.org
  2. 2.
  3. 3.
  4. 4.
    Zipf, A.: User-Adaptive Maps for Location-Based Services (LBS) for Tourism. In: Woeber, K., Frew, A., Hitz, M. (eds.) Proc. of the 9th Int. Conf. for Information and Communication Technologies in Tourism. LNCS, pp. 329–338. Springer, Heidelberg (2002)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Rao, B., Minakakis, L.: Evolution of mobile location-based services. Communications of ACM 46(12), 61–65 (2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Gómez-Pérez, A., Fernández-López, M., Corcho, O.: Ontological Engineering with examples from the areas of Knowledge Management, e-Commerce and the Semantic Web. Springer, Heidelberg (2004)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    ELIKO Competence Centre in Electronics-, Info- and Communication Technologies, http://www.eliko.ee
  8. 8.
  9. 9.
    Ressler, J., Dean, M., Kolas, D.: Geospatial Ontology Trade Study, National Geospatial-Intelligence Agency (2007), projects.semwebcentral.org/docman/?group_id=84
  10. 10.
    Randell, D.A., Cui, Z., Cohn, A.G.: A spatial logic based on regions and connections. In: Proc. 3rd International Conference on Knowledge Representation and Reasoning, pp. 165–176. Morgan Kaufman, San Francisco (1992)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    GEO RSS, www.georss.org/
  12. 12.
    SWEET project, sweet.jpl.nasa.gov/2.0/
  13. 13.
  14. 14.
    CINeSPACE project, http://www.cinespace.eu
  15. 15.
  16. 16.
    Grütter, R., Scharrenbach, T., Bauer-Messmer, B.: Improving an RCC-Derived Geospatial Approximation by OWL Axioms. In: Sheth, A.P., Staab, S., Dean, M., Paolucci, M., Maynard, D., Finin, T., Thirunarayan, K. (eds.) ISWC 2008. LNCS, vol. 5318, pp. 293–306. Springer, Heidelberg (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
  18. 18.
  19. 19.
  20. 20.
  21. 21.
  22. 22.
    Baader, F., et al. (eds.): The Description Logic Handbook. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (2003)MATHGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Robal, T., Haav, H.-M., Kalja, A.: Making Web Users Domain Models Explicit by Applying Ontologies. In: Hainaut, J.-L., Rundensteiner, E.A., Kirchberg, M., Bertolotto, M., Brochhausen, M., Chen, Y.-P.P., Cherfi, S.S.-S., Doerr, M., Han, H., Hartmann, S., Parsons, J., Poels, G., Rolland, C., Trujillo, J., Yu, E., Zimányie, E. (eds.) ER Workshops 2007. LNCS, vol. 4802, pp. 170–179. Springer, Heidelberg (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Middleton, S., De Roure, D., Shadbolt, N.: Capturing Knowledge of User Preferences: Ontologies in Recommender Systems. In: 1st Int. Conference on Knowledge Capture, pp. 100–107. ACM Press, New York (2001)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Baglioni, M., Masserotti, M.V., Renso, C., Spinsanti, L.: Building Geospatial Ontologies from Geographical databases. In: Fonseca, F., Rodríguez, M.A., Levashkin, S. (eds.) GeoS 2007. LNCS, vol. 4853, pp. 195–209. Springer, Heidelberg (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
  27. 27.
    Wessel, M., Möller, R.: Flexible Software Architectures for Ontology-Based Information Systems. Journal of Applied Logic, Special Issue on Empirically Successful Systems 7(1), 75–99 (2009)MATHGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Zhao, T., Zhang, C., Wei, M., Peng, Z.-R.: Ontology-Based Geospatial Data Query and Integration. In: Cova, T.J., Miller, H.J., Beard, K., Frank, A.U., Goodchild, M.F. (eds.) GIScience 2008. LNCS, vol. 5266, pp. 370–392. Springer, Heidelberg (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Kolas, D., Hebeler, J., Dean, M.: Geospatial Semantic Web: Architecture of Ontologies. In: Rodríguez, M.A., Cruz, I., Levashkin, S., Egenhofer, M.J. (eds.) GeoS 2005. LNCS, vol. 3799, pp. 183–194. Springer, Heidelberg (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2009

Authors and Affiliations

  • Hele-Mai Haav
    • 1
  • Aivi Kaljuvee
    • 4
  • Martin Luts
    • 2
    • 3
  • Toivo Vajakas
    • 4
  1. 1.Institute of Cybernetics at Tallinn University of TechnologyTallinnEstonia
  2. 2.ELIKO Competence Centre in Electronics-, Info- and Communication TechnologiesTallinnEstonia
  3. 3.Department of InformaticsTallinn University of TechnologyTallinnEstonia
  4. 4.Regio LtdTartuEstonia

Personalised recommendations