Randomized Gathering of Mobile Robots with Local-Multiplicity Detection

  • Taisuke Izumi
  • Tomoko Izumi
  • Sayaka Kamei
  • Fukuhito Ooshita
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 5873)

Abstract

Let us consider the gathering problem of n anonymous and oblivious mobile robots, which requires that all robots meet in finite time at a non-predefined point. While the gathering problem cannot be solved deterministically without any additional capability to robots, randomized approach easily allows it to be solvable. However, only the randomized solution taking expected round complexity exponential of n is currently known. Motivated by this fact, we investigate the feasibility of polynomial-expected-round randomized gathering in this paper. Our first contribution is to give a negative result about the round complexity of randomized gathering. It is proved that any algorithm without no additional assumption has \({\it \Omega}(\mathrm{exp}(n))\) expected-round lower bound. This lower bound yields a question: What additional assumptions are necessary to achieve gathering in polynomial expected rounds? We address this question from the aspect of multiplicity detection. This paper newly introduces two weaker variants of multiplicity detection capability, called local-strong and local-weak multiplicity, and investigates whether those capabilities permit polynomial-expected-round gathering or not. Our second contribution is to reveal the power of local (strong/weak) multiplicity by showing that local-strong multiplicity detection allows O(n)-expected round gathering but local-weak multiplicity detection takes an exponential-time lower bound. These results imply that those two kinds of multiplicity-detection capabilities have inherently large difference about their computational powers.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Agmon, N., Peleg, D.: Fault-tolerant gathering algorithms for autonomous mobile robots. SIAM Journal of Computing 36(1), 56–82 (2006)MATHCrossRefMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Cieliebak, M., Flocchini, P., Prencipe, G., Santoro, N.: Solving the robots gathering problem. In: Baeten, J.C.M., Lenstra, J.K., Parrow, J., Woeginger, G.J. (eds.) ICALP 2003. LNCS, vol. 2719, pp. 1181–1196. Springer, Heidelberg (2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Clement, J., Défago, X., Gradinariu, M., Izumi, T., Messika, S.: The cost of probabilistic agreement in oblivious robot networks (to submitted)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Défago, X., Gradinariu, M., Messika, S., Parvédy, P.R.: Fault-tolerant and self-stabilizing mobile robots gathering. In: Dolev, S. (ed.) DISC 2006. LNCS, vol. 4167, pp. 46–60. Springer, Heidelberg (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Flocchini, P., Prencipe, G., Santoro, N., Widmayer, P.: Gathering of asynchronous robots with limited visibility. Theoreical Computer Science 337(1-3), 147–168 (2005)MATHCrossRefMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Inuzuka, N., Tomida, Y., Izumi, T., Katayama, Y., Wada, K.: Gathering problem of two asynchronous mobile robots with semi-dynamic compasses. In: Shvartsman, A.A., Felber, P. (eds.) SIROCCO 2008. LNCS, vol. 5058, pp. 5–19. Springer, Heidelberg (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Izumi, T., Katayama, Y., Inuzuka, N., Wada, K.: Gathering autonomous mobile robots with dynamic compasses: An optimal result. In: Pelc, A. (ed.) DISC 2007. LNCS, vol. 4731, pp. 298–312. Springer, Heidelberg (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Katayama, Y., Tomida, Y., Imazu, H., Inuzuka, N., Wada, K.: Dynamic compass models and gathering algorithm for autonomous mobile robots. In: Prencipe, G., Zaks, S. (eds.) SIROCCO 2007. LNCS, vol. 4474, pp. 274–288. Springer, Heidelberg (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Prencipe, G.: Impossibility of gathering by a set of autonomous mobile robots. Theoretical Computer Science 384(2-3), 222–231 (2007)MATHCrossRefMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Souissi, S., Défago, X., Yamashita, M.: Gathering asynchronous mobile robots with inaccurate compasses. In: Shvartsman, M.M.A.A. (ed.) OPODIS 2006. LNCS, vol. 4305, pp. 333–349. Springer, Heidelberg (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Souissi, S., Défago, X., Yamashita, M.: Using eventually consistent compasses to gather memory-less mobile robots with limited visibility. ACM Trans. on Autonomous Adaptive and Adaptive Systems 4(1) (2009)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Suzuki, I., Yamashita, M.: Distributed anonymous mobile robots: Formation of geometric patterns. SIAM Journal of Computing 28(4), 1347–1363 (1999)MATHCrossRefMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Yamashita, M., Souissi, S., Défago, X.: Gathering two stateless mobile robots using very inaccurate compasses in finite time. In: Proc. of the 1st International Conference on Robot Communication and Coordination (ROBOCOMM), p. 48 (2007)Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Yamashita, M., Suzuki, I.: Characterizing geometric patterns formable by oblivious anonymous mobile robots (unpublished)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2009

Authors and Affiliations

  • Taisuke Izumi
    • 1
  • Tomoko Izumi
    • 2
  • Sayaka Kamei
    • 3
  • Fukuhito Ooshita
    • 4
  1. 1.Graduate School of EngineeringNagoya Institute of Technology 
  2. 2.College of Information Science and EngineeringRitsumeikan University 
  3. 3.Graduate School of EngineeringHiroshima University 
  4. 4.Graduate School of Information Science and TechnologyOsaka University 

Personalised recommendations