Standardization of Software Size Measurement

  • Beata Czarnacka-Chrobot
Part of the Advances in Intelligent and Soft Computing book series (AINSC, volume 64)

Abstract

The measurement of software products is an area of software engineering, which cannot be considered as sufficiently mature not only in terms of practice, but also in terms of knowledge maturity. That is why over the last couple of years significant intensification of works could have been observed, which aimed to standardize the best practices of software products measurement. Various ISO/IEC norms have been developed as a result of these works, filling an important gap in the software engineering. One of the most important groups of ISO/IEC standards concerns the software product size measurement. Normalization of such measurement is mainly aimed at reducing unnecessary diversity in the area of software size measures, ensuring compatibility between the standardized approaches as well as their usefulness, especially for Business Software Systems. Thus the aim of the paper is to provide a synthetic presentation of these very aspects of the software products size measurement standardization.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Czarnacka-Chrobot, B., Kobylinski, A.: Ocena miar zakresu produktu programowego (Software Size Measures Assessment). Prace Naukowe Uniwersytetu Ekonomicznego we Wroclawiu, Wroclaw (in press, 2009)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Fenton, N.E.: Zapewnienie jakosci i metryki oprogramowania (Ensuring software quality and software metrics). In: Gorski, J. (ed.) Inzynieria oprogramowania w projekcie informatycznym (Software Engineering in IT Project), 2nd edn. Mikom, Warsaw (2000)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Gartner Research: Function Points Can help Measure Application Size. Research Notes SPA-18-0878 (2002)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    IEEE Std 610.12-1990: IEEE Standard Glossary of Software Engineering Terminology. The Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers, New York (1990)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    ISBSG: The ISBSG Report: Software Project Estimates – How accurate are they? International Benchmarking Standards Group, Hawthorn VIC, Australia (2005)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    ISO/IEC 12207:2008 Systems and software engineering – Software life cycle processes. ISO, Geneva (2008)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    ISO/IEC 14143 Information Technology – Software measurement – Functional size measurement – Part 1-6. ISO, Geneva (1998-2007)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    ISO/IEC 15288:2008 Systems and software engineering – System life cycle processes. ISO, Geneva (2008)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    ISO/IEC 15939:2007 Systems and software engineering - Measurement process. ISO, Geneva (2007)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    ISO/IEC 19761:2003 Software engineering – COSMIC-FFP – A functional size measurement method. ISO, Geneva (2003)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    ISO/IEC 20926:2003 Software engineering - IFPUG 4.1 Unadjusted functional size measurement method - Counting practices manual. ISO, Geneva (2003)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    ISO/IEC 20968:2002 Software engineering - Mk II Function Point Analysis - Counting practices manual. ISO, Geneva (2002)Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    ISO/IEC 24570:2005 Software engineering – NESMA functional size measurement method version 2.1 - Definitions and counting guidelines for the application of Function Point Analysis. ISO, Geneva (2005)Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    ISO/IEC 29881:2008 Information Technology – Software and systems engineering – FiSMA 1.1 functional size measurement method. ISO, Geneva (2008)Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Johnson, J.: CHAOS Rising, Standish Group. In: Proceedings of the 2nd National Conference on the IT System Quality (2005)Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Panorama Consulting Group: 2008 ERP Report, Topline Results. Denver (2008)Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Parthasarathy, M.A.: Practical Software Estimation: Function Point Methods for Insourced and Outsourced Projects. Addison Wesley Professional, Reading (2007)Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Standish Group: CHAOS Summary 2009. West Yarmouth, Massachusetts (2009)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2009

Authors and Affiliations

  • Beata Czarnacka-Chrobot
    • 1
  1. 1.Faculty of Business InformaticsWarsaw School of EconomicsWarszawaPoland

Personalised recommendations