Towards Agile Ontology Maintenance

  • Markus Luczak-Rösch
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 5823)


Ontologies are an appropriate means to represent knowledge on the Web. Research on ontology engineering reached practices for an integrative lifecycle support. However, a broader success of ontologies in Web-based information systems remains unreached while the more lightweight semantic approaches are rather successful. We assume, paired with the emerging trend of services and microservices on the Web, new dynamic scenarios gain momentum in which a shared knowledge base is made available to several dynamically changing services with disparate requirements. Our work envisions a step towards such a dynamic scenario in which an ontology adapts to the requirements of the accessing services and applications as well as the user’s needs in an agile way and reduces the experts’ involvement in ontology maintenance processes.


Ontology Evolution Ontology Engineering Ontology Engineer Ontology Change Feedback Tracking 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


  1. 1.
    Auer, S., Herre, H.: RapidOWL — An Agile Knowledge Engineering Methodology. In: Virbitskaite, I., Voronkov, A. (eds.) PSI 2006. LNCS, vol. 4378, pp. 424–430. Springer, Heidelberg (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Aulbach, S., Jacobs, D., Kemper, A., Seibold, M.: A comparison of flexible schemas for software as a service. In: SIGMOD 2009: Proceedings of the 35th SIGMOD international conference on Management of data, pp. 881–888. ACM, New York (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Davies, M.: Towards a Semantic Infrastructure for User Generated Mobile Services. In: ASWC 2007 and ISWC 2007. LNCS, vol. 4825, pp. 924–928. Springer, Heidelberg (2009)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Djedidi, R., Aufaure, M.-A.: Ontological knowledge maintenance methodology. In: Lovrek, I., Howlett, R.J., Jain, L.C. (eds.) KES 2008, Part I. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 5177, pp. 557–564. Springer, Heidelberg (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Erdil, K., Finn, E., Keating, K., Meattle, J., Park, S., Yoon, D.: Software Maintenance As Part of the Software Life Cycle. Comp180: Software Engineering Project, December 16 (2003)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Fernndez-Lpez, M., Gmez-Prez, A., Juristo, N.: METHONTOLOGY: From Ontological Art Towards Ontological Engineering. In: AAAI 1997 Spring Symposium on Ontological Engineering. AAAI Press, Menlo Park (1997)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Kotis, K., Vouros, A.: Human-centered ontology engineering: The HCOME methodology. Knowl. Inf. Syst. 10(1), 109–131 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Noy, N.F., Kunnatur, S., Klein, M., Musen, M.: Tracking Changes During Ontology Evolution. In: Proceedings of the Third International Semantic Web Conference, pp. 259–273. Springer, Berlin (2004)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Pinto, H.S., Tempich, C., Staab, S., Sure, Y.: Distributed Engineering of Ontologies (DILIGENT). Semantic Web and Peer-to-Peer. Springer, Heidelberg (2005)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Simperl, E., Tempich, C.: How Much Does It Cost? Applying ONTOCOM to DILIGENT. Technical Report, FU Berlin (2005)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Simperl, E., Tempich, C.: Ontology Engineering: A Reality Check. In: ASWC 2007 and ISWC 2007. LNCS, vol. 4825, pp. 836–854. Springer, Heidelberg (2006)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Stojanovic, N., Stojanovic, L.: Usage-Oriented Evolution of Ontology-Based Knowledge Management Systems. In: Meersman, R., Tari, Z., et al. (eds.) CoopIS 2002, DOA 2002, and ODBASE 2002. LNCS, vol. 2519. Springer, Heidelberg (2002)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Stojanovic, L., Stojanovic, N., Gonzalez, J., Studer, R.: OntoManager - A System for the Usage-Based Ontology Management. In: CoopIS/DOA/ODBASE, vol. 2888. Springer, Heidelberg (2003)Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Stojanovic, L.: Methods and Tools for Ontology Evolution. PhD Thesis, University of Karlsruhe, Germany (2004)Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Sure, Y., Studer, R.: On-To-Knowledge Methodology — Expanded Version. In: On-To-Knowledge deliverable, vol. 17, Institute AIFB, University of Karlsruhe (2002)Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Tran, T., Haase, P., Lewen, H., Muñoz-García, Ó., Gómez-Pérez, A., Studer, R.: Lifecycle-Support in Architectures for Ontology-Based Information Systems. In: Aberer, K., Choi, K.-S., Noy, N., Allemang, D., Lee, K.-I., Nixon, L.J.B., Golbeck, J., Mika, P., Maynard, D., Mizoguchi, R., Schreiber, G., Cudré-Mauroux, P. (eds.) ASWC 2007 and ISWC 2007. LNCS, vol. 4825, pp. 508–522. Springer, Heidelberg (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Völkel, M., Groza, T.: SemVersion: RDF-based Ontology Versioning System. In: Proceedings of the IADIS International Conference WWW / Internet 2006 (ICWI 2006), Murcia, Spain (2006)Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Zablith, F.: Dynamic Ontology Evolution. In: International Semantic Web Conference (ISWC) Doctoral Consortium, Karlsruhe, GermanyGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2009

Authors and Affiliations

  • Markus Luczak-Rösch
    • 1
  1. 1.Institute of Computer Science, Corporate Semantic Web WorkgroupFreie Universität BerlinBerlinGermany

Personalised recommendations