Advertisement

Hosted Universal Composition: Models, Languages and Infrastructure in mashArt

  • Florian Daniel
  • Fabio Casati
  • Boualem Benatallah
  • Ming-Chien Shan
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 5829)

Abstract

Information integration, application integration and component-based software development have been among the most important research areas for decades. The last years have been characterized by a particular focus on web services, the very recent years by the advent of web mashups, a new and user-centric form of integration on the Web. However, while service composition approaches lack support for user interfaces, web mashups still lack well engineered development approaches and mature technological foundations.

In this paper, we aim to overcome both these shortcomings and propose what we call a universal composition approach that naturally brings together data and application services with user interfaces. We propose a unified component model and a universal, event-based composition model, both able to abstract from low-level implementation details and technology specifics. Via the mashArt platform, we then provide universal composition as a service in form of an easy-to-use graphical development tool equipped with an execution environment for fast deployment and execution of composite Web applications.

Keywords

Service Composition User Interface Component Service Orchestration RESTful Service BPEL Process 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Yu, J., et al.: Understanding Mashup Development and its Differences with Traditional Integration. Internet Computing 12(5), 44–52 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    OASIS. Web Services for Remote Portlets (August 2003), http://www.oasis-open.org/committees/wsrp
  3. 3.
    Yu, J., et al.: A Framework for Rapid Integration of Presentation Components. In: WWW 2007, pp. 923–932 (2007)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Alonso, G., Casati, F., Kuno, H., Machiraju, V.: Web Services: Concepts, Architectures and Applications. Springer, Heidelberg (2003)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Dustdar, S., Schreiner, W.: A survey on web services composition, Int. J. Web Grid Services 1(1), 1–30 (2005) CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    OASIS. Web Services Business Process Execution Language Version 2.0 (April 2007), http://docs.oasis-open.org/wsbpel/2.0/OS/wsbpel-v2.0-OS.html
  7. 7.
    Pautasso, C.: BPEL for REST. In: Dumas, M., Reichert, M., Shan, M.-C. (eds.) BPM 2008. LNCS, vol. 5240, pp. 278–293. Springer, Heidelberg (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    van Lessen, T., et al.: A Management Framework for WS-BPEL. In: ECoWS 2008, Dublin (2008)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Curbera, F., Duftler, M., Khalaf, R., Lovell, D.: Bite: Workflow composition for the web. In: Krämer, B.J., Lin, K.-J., Narasimhan, P., et al. (eds.) ICSOC 2007. LNCS, vol. 4749, pp. 94–106. Springer, Heidelberg (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Maximilien, E.M., et al.: An Online Platform for Web APIs and Service Mashups. Internet Computing 12(5), 32–43 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Braga, D., et al.: Optimization of Multi-Domain Queries on the Web. In: VLDB 2008, Auckland, pp. 562–573 (2008)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Daniel, F., et al.: Understanding UI Integration - A Survey of Problems, Technologies, and Opportunities. In: IEEE Internet Computing, pp. 59-66 (May 2007)Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Microsoft Corporation. Smart Client - Composite UI Application Block (December 2005), http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/aa480450.aspx
  14. 14.
    The Eclipse Foundation. Rich Client Platform (October 2008), http://wiki.eclipse.org/index.php/RCP
  15. 15.
    Sun Microsystems. JSR-000168 Portlet Specification (October 2003), http://jcp.org/aboutJava/communityprocess/final/jsr168/
  16. 16.
    Acerbis, R., et al.: Web Applications Design and Development with WebML and WebRatio 5.0. TOOLS (46), pp. 392-411 (2008)Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Gómez, J., Bia, A., Parraga, A.: Tool support for model-driven development of web applications. In: Ngu, A.H.H., Kitsuregawa, M., Neuhold, E.J., Chung, J.-Y., Sheng, Q.Z. (eds.) WISE 2005. LNCS, vol. 3806, pp. 721–730. Springer, Heidelberg (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2009

Authors and Affiliations

  • Florian Daniel
    • 1
  • Fabio Casati
    • 1
  • Boualem Benatallah
    • 2
  • Ming-Chien Shan
    • 3
  1. 1.University of TrentoTrentoItaly
  2. 2.University of New South WalesSydneyAustralia
  3. 3.SAP LabsPalo AltoUSA

Personalised recommendations