Advertisement

Towards the Selection of Testable Use Cases and a Real Experience

  • Andreia Rodrigues
  • Plácido Rogério Pinheiro
  • Maikol Magalhães Rodrigues
  • Adriano Bessa Albuquerque
  • Francisca Márcia Gonçalves
Part of the Communications in Computer and Information Science book series (CCIS, volume 49)

Abstract

Nowadays, software organizations have needed to develop excellent and reliable products. This scenario has helped to increase the relevance of quality assurance activities, especially the testing discipline. However, sometimes the time and resources are limited and not all tests can be executed, demanding organizations to decide what use cases should be tested, to guarantee the predictability of the project’s time and budget.The multiple criteria methodologies support decisions, considering many factors, not only professional experience. This paper presents a multiple criteria model to support the decision of selecting the use cases that should be tested.

Keywords

Tests Decision and Analysis Resolution Multiple Criteria Decision Analysis 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Bana, Costa, C.A., Beinat, E., Vickerman, R.: Model-structuring and impact assessment: qualitative analysis of policy attractiveness. CEG-IST Working Paper n.25 (2001)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Bandeira, L.R.P.: Product Quality from Test Automation: a Case Study. Monograph to obtain the B.Sc in Computer Science Title, University of the Ceara State (2005)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Craig, R.D., Jaskiel, S.P.: Systematic Software Testing. Artech House Publishers, Boston (2002)zbMATHGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Cunha, J.A.O.: Decisius: Um Processo de Apoio à Decisão e sua Aplicação na Definição de um Índice de Produtividade para Projetos de Software, Dissertation of M.Sc., CIN/UFPE, Recife, PE, Brazil (2008)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Dias, A.: Introduction to Software Testing. Magazine of Software Engineering, on-line (2007), http://www.devmedia.com.br/esm
  6. 6.
    Flament, M.: Multiple Criteria Glossary. Red Iberoamericana de Evaluación y Decisión Multicritério, Espanha (1999), http://www.unesco.org.uy/redm/glosariom.htm
  7. 7.
    Gonçalves, F.M.G.S., Donegan, P.M., Castro, A.K., Pinheiro, P.R., Carvalho, A., Belchior, A.D.: Multi-criteria Model for Selection of Automated System Tests. In: The IFIP International Conference on Research and Practical Issues of Enterprise Information Systems, Viena. IFIP International Federation for Information Processing (2006)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Pinheiro, P.R., Castro, A., Pinheiro, M.: A Multicriteria Model Applied in the Diagnosis of Alzheimer Disease: A Bayesian Network. In: 11th IEEE International Conference on Computational Science and Engineering, July 2008, pp. 15–22 (2008), doi:10.1109/CSE.2008.44Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Marilia, M., Carvalho, A.L., Furtado, M.E.S., Pinheiro, P.R.: A co-evolutionary interaction design of digital TVapplications based on verbal decision analysis of user experiences. International Journal of Digital Culture and Electronic Tourism (IJDCET) 1, 312–324 (2009)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Marilia, M., Carvalho, A.L., Furtado, M.E.S., Pinheiro, P.R.: Co-evolutionary Interaction Design of Digital TV Applications Based on Verbal Decision Analysis of User Experiences. In: WSKS 2008, vol. 19, pp. 702–711 (2008), doi:10.1007/978-3-540-87783-7Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Meskens, N., Roubens, M. (eds.): Advances in Decision Analysis. Book Series: Mathematical Modelling: Theory and Applications, vol. 4, pp. 131–157. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht (1999)zbMATHGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Myers, G.J.: The Art of Software Testing. John Wiley & Sons, Inc., New York (1979)Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Oliveira, J.M.M., Oliveira, K.B., Castro, A.K., Pinheiro, P.R., Belchior, A.D.: Application of Multi-Criteria to Perform an Organizational Measurement Process. In: Elleithy, K. (ed.) Advances and Innovations in Systems, Computing Sciences and Software Engineering, pp. 247–252. Springer, Heidelberg (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Pinheiro, P.R., Souza, G.G.C., Castro, A.K.A.: Structuring of the Multicriteria Problem for the Production of Journal. Pesqui. Oper. 28(2), 203–216 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Evangelou, C., Karacapilidis, N., Khaled, O.A.: Interweaving knowledge management, argumentation and decision making in a collaborative setting: the KAD ontology model. Int. J. of Knowledge and Learning 2005 1(1/2), 130–145 (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2009

Authors and Affiliations

  • Andreia Rodrigues
    • 1
  • Plácido Rogério Pinheiro
    • 1
  • Maikol Magalhães Rodrigues
    • 1
  • Adriano Bessa Albuquerque
    • 1
  • Francisca Márcia Gonçalves
    • 1
  1. 1.Graduate Program in Applied Computer SciencesUniversity of Fortaleza (UNIFOR)FortalezaBrazil

Personalised recommendations