Advertisement

Modeling Learning Technology Interaction Using SOPHIE: Main Mappings and Example Usage Scenarios

  • Sinuhé Arroyo
  • Miguel-Ángel Sicilia
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 5736)

Abstract

Learning technology is nowadays subject to intensive standardization efforts that have lead to different specifications defining the functions and information formats provided by different components. However, differences persist and in some cases, the proliferation of proposed standards and protocols leads to increased heterogeneity. Further, the terminologies used to describe resources and activities are diverse, resulting in semantic interoperability problems and conversations between elements that have still not been addressed. The SOPHIE model for semantically describing choreographies has the potential to mediate between these heterogeneous behaviors and representations. This paper sketches the main elements of a mapping of service-based learning technology components based on OKI OSIDs, and provides some examples of mediation based on SOPHIE.

Keywords

Choreographies ontologies learning technology OKI OSID SOPHIE 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Arroyo, S., Duke, A., López-Cobo, J.M., Sicilia, M.A.: A model-driven choreography conceptual framework. Computer Standards & Interfaces 29(3), 325–334 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Arroyo, S., Sicilia, M.A.: SOPHIE: Use case and evaluation. Information and Software Technology 50(12), 1266–1280 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Arroyo, S., Sicilia, M.A., López-Cobo, J.M.: Patterns of message interchange in decoupled hypermedia systems. Journal of Network and Computer Applications 31(2), 75–92 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Dagger, D., O’Connor, A., Lawless, S., Walsh, E., Wade, V.P.: Service-Oriented E-Learning Platforms: From Monolithic Systems to Flexible Services. IEEE Internet Computing 11(3), 28–35 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Devedžić, V., Jovanović, J., Gašević, D.: The pragmatics of current e-learning standards. IEEE Internet Computing 11(3), 16–24 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Jayal, A., Shepperd, M.J.: An evaluation of e-learning standards. In: Proceedings of the 5th International Conference on E-Governance, Hyderabad, India, December 28-30 (2007)Google Scholar
  7. Rius, A., Sicília, M.A., García-Barriocanal, E.: An ontology to automate learning scenarios? An approach to its knowledge domain. Interdisciplinary Journal of Knowledge and Learning Objects 4, 151–165 (2008)Google Scholar
  8. Rius, A., Sicília, M.A., García-Barriocanal, E.: Towards automated specifications of scenarios in enhanced learning technology. Int. J. of Web-Based Learning and Teaching Technologies 3(1), 68–78 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Severance, C., Hardin, J., Whyte, A.: The coming functionality mash-up in Personal Learning Environments. Interactive Learning Environments 16(1), 1744–5191 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Vogten, H., Martens, H., Nadolski, R., Tattersall, C., van Rosmalen, P., Koper, R.: CopperCore Service Integration - Integrating IMS Learning Design and IMS Question and Test Interoperability. In: Proc. of the Sixth IEEE International Conference on Advanced Learning Technologies (ICALT 2006), pp. 378–382 (2006)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2009

Authors and Affiliations

  • Sinuhé Arroyo
    • 1
  • Miguel-Ángel Sicilia
    • 1
  1. 1.Information Engineering Research Unit Computer Science Dept.University of AlcaláAlcalá de Henares (Madrid)Spain

Personalised recommendations