Advertisement

Learning Objects Quality: Moodle HEODAR Implementation

  • Carlos Muñoz
  • Miguel Ángel Conde
  • Francisco J. García Peñalvo
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 5736)

Abstract

One of the most important aspects of a “continuously in change” society is to improve everything everywhere. In order to obtain the best products, they should be periodically evaluated and reengineering. So the evaluation task and, of course, the adequate results interpretation, can make all the difference between competitors. eLearning is similar to this products. Different issues can be evaluated to make learning process getting better and better, such as tutors, platform software and contents. In this last issue, it can be included the minimum knowledge unit: the Learning Object (LO). There exists different models and methods for LO evaluation. What is pretended with this work is to choose one model and implement a singularly tool, in order to automatically evaluate this Learning Objects and produce a set of information, that can be used to improve those Learning Objects. In this case it is implemented the evaluation model called HEODAR in the University of Salamanca framework.

Keywords

Learning Object evaluation Moodle module agent JADE quality 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Marquès, P.: Criterios de calidad para los espacios web de interés educativo, http://decroly.org/escola/formacio/criterios_%20calidad_web_educ.pdf
  2. 2.
    Gibbs, W., Graves, P.R., Bermas, R.S.: Evaluation guidelines for multimedia courseware. Journal of Research on Technology in Education 34(1), 2–17 (2001)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Morales, E., García, F., Barrón, A., Berlanga, A., López, C.: Propuesta de Evaluación de Objetos de Aprendizaje. II Simposio Pluridisciplinar sobre Diseño, Evaluación y Descripción de Contenidos Educativos, SPEDECE (2005)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    MERLOT (2009), http://www.merlot.org/
  5. 5.
    eLera. Simon Fraser University, Surrey, British Columbia, Canada (2009), http://www.elera.net
  6. 6.
    Nesbit, J.C., Li, J.: Web-based tools for learning object evaluation. In: International Conference on Education and Information Systems: Technologies and Applications, Orlando, Florida (2004)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Nesbit, J., Belfer, K., Leacock, T.: Learning Object Review Instrument (LORI) User Manual E-Learning Research and Assessment Network (2003)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Morales, E.: Gestión del Conocimiento en Sistemas eLearning, basado en Objetos de Aprendizaje, Cualitativa y Pedagógicamente definidos. University of Salamanca, Salamanca, Spain (2008)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Cole, J., Foster, H.: Using Moodle, 2nd edn. O’Really, Sebastopol (2007)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Molist, M.: Moodle llena la geografía educativa española de campus virtuales. Diario el Pais (2008), http://www.elpais.com/articulo/portada/Moodle/llena/geografia/educativa/espanola/campus/virtuales/elpeputec/20081204elpcibpor_1/Tes
  11. 11.
    Morales, E., Gomez, D.A., Garcia, F.J.: HEODAR: Herramienta para la Evaluación de Objetos Didácticos de Aprendizaje Reutilizables. In: SIIE 2008, Salamanca, Spain (2008)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Scutelnicua, A., Linb, F., Kinshukb, L.T., Grafd, S., McGrealb, R.: Integrating JADE Agents into Moodle. In: Proceedings of the International Workshop on Intelligent and Adaptive Web-based Educational Systems (IAWES), Hiroshima, Japan, pp. 215–220 (2007)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2009

Authors and Affiliations

  • Carlos Muñoz
    • 1
  • Miguel Ángel Conde
    • 1
  • Francisco J. García Peñalvo
    • 1
  1. 1.Factultad de CienciasUniversity of SalamancaSalamancaSpain

Personalised recommendations