Advertisement

Simulative Analysis of Vehicle-to-X Communication considering Traffic Safety and Efficiency

  • O. Jetter
  • M. Killat
  • J. Mittag
  • F. Schmidt-Eisenlohr
  • J. Dinger
  • H. Hartenstein
Conference paper

Abstract

Over the past several years, there has been significant interest and progress in using wireless communication technologies for vehicular environments in order to increase traffic safety and efficiency. Due to the fact that these systems are still under development and large-scale tests based on real hardware are difficult to manage, simulations are a widely-used and cost-efficient method to explore such scenarios. Furthermore, simulations provide a possibility to look at specific aspects individually and to identify major influencing effects out of a wide range of configurations. In this context, we use the HP XC4000 for an extensive and detailed sensitivity analysis in order to evaluate the robustness and performance of communication protocols as well as to capture the complex characteristics of such systems in terms of an empirical model.

Keywords

Hybrid Simulation Vehicle Density Packet Reception Transmit Power Control Wireless Communication Technology 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    D. Bertsekas and R. Gallager. Data Networks. Prentice Hall, 1987. Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    L. Briesemeister and L. Schäfers. Disseminating Messages Among Highly Mobile Hosts Based on Inter-Vehicle Communication. In IEEE Intelligent Vehicles Symp., pages 522–527, 2000. Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Q. Chen, F. Schmidt-Eisenlohr, D. Jiang, M. Torrent-Moreno, L. Delgrossi, and H. Hartenstein. Overhaul of IEEE 802.11 Modeling and Simulation in ns-2. In Proc. of the 10th ACM Symp. on Modeling, Analysis, and Simulation of Wireless and Mobile Systems (MSWiM), pages 159–168. ACM, 2007. Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    D. Jiang, Q. Chen, and L. Delgrossi. Optimal Data Rate Selection for Vehicle Safety Communications. In Proc. of the 5th ACM Int’l Workshop on VehiculAr Inter-NETworking (VANET), pages 30–38. ACM, 2008. Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    K. Jünemann. Entwurf und Implementierung einer Simulationsmanagementlösung. Diploma thesis. Institute of Telematics, Universität Karlsruhe (TH), 2008. Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    H. Kawashima. Japanese perspective of driver information systems. Transportation, 17(3):263–284, 1990. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    M. Killat and H. Hartenstein. An Empirical Model for Probability of Packet Reception in Vehicular Ad Hoc Networks. EURASIP Journal on Wireless Communications and Networking, 2009. Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    M. Killat, F. Schmidt-Eisenlohr, H. Hartenstein, C. Rössel, P. Vortisch, S. Assenmacher, and F. Busch. Enabling efficient and accurate large-scale simulations of vanets for vehicular traffic management. In Proc. of the 4th ACM Int’l Workshop on Vehicular Ad hoc NETworks (VANET), pages 29–38. ACM, 2007. Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    NS-2. Network Simulator NS-2, Version 2.33. http://www.isi.edu/nsnam/, 2008.
  10. 10.
    H. D. Schwetman. Hybrid simulation models of computer systems. Communications of the ACM, (9), 1978. Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    M. Torrent-Moreno. Inter-Vehicle Communications: Achieving Safety in a Distributed Wireless Environment — Challenges, Systems and Protocols (PhD Thesis). Universitätsverlag Karlsruhe, 2007. Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    M. Torrent-Moreno. Inter-Vehicle Communications: Assessing Information Dissemination under Safety Constraints. In Proc. of the 4th IEEE/IFIP Conf. on Wireless On demand Network Systems and Services (WONS), pages 59–64, 2007. Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    M. Torrent-Moreno, J. Mittag, P. Santi, and H. Hartenstein. Vehicle-to-Vehicle Communication: Fair Transmit Power Control for Safety-Critical Information. Accepted for publication. IEEE Trans. on Vehicular Technology, 2009. Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    M. Torrent-Moreno, P. Santi, and H. Hartenstein. Fair Sharing of Bandwidth in VANET. In Proc. of the 2nd ACM Int’l Workshop on Vehicular Ad hoc NETworks (VANET), pages 49–58, 2005. Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    M. Torrent-Moreno, P. Santi, and H. Hartenstein. Distributed Fair Transmit Power Assignment for Vehicular Ad Hoc Networks. In Proc. of the 3rd Annual IEEE Conf. on Sensor, Mesh and Ad Hoc Communications and Networks (SECON), volume 2, pages 479–488, 2006. Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2010

Authors and Affiliations

  • O. Jetter
  • M. Killat
  • J. Mittag
  • F. Schmidt-Eisenlohr
  • J. Dinger
  • H. Hartenstein
    • 1
  1. 1.Steinbuch Centre for Computing (SCC), Karlsruhe Institute of Technology (KIT) and Institute of TelematicsUniversität Karlsruhe (TH)KarlsruheGermany

Personalised recommendations