Advertisement

Supporting the Learning Dimension of Knowledge Work

  • Stefanie N. Lindstaedt
  • Mario Aehnelt
  • Robert de Hoog
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 5794)

Abstract

We argue that in order to increase knowledge work productivity we have to put more emphasis on supporting this learning dimension of knowledge work. The key distinctions compared to other TEL approaches are (1) taking the tight integration of working and learning seriously, (2) enabling seamless transitions on the continuum of learning practices, and (3) tapping into the resources (material as well as human) of the organization. Within this contribution we develop the concept of work-integrated learning (WIL) and show how it can be implemented. The APOSDLE environment serves as a reference architecture which proves how a variety of tightly integrated support services implement the three key distinctions discussed above.

Keywords

workplace learning professional learning self-directed learning collaboration scripts user profiles recommendation systems 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Anderson, L.W., Krathwohl, D.R.: A taxonomy for learning, teaching and assessing: A Revision of Bloom’s Taxonomy of Educational Objectives. Pearson Education, London (2001)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    APOSDLE Consortium: Integrated APOSDLE Deliverables 2.8 and 3.5 APOSDLE Approach to Self-Directed Work-Integrated Learning (2009)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Bannert, M.: Metakognition beim lernen mit Hypermedien: Erfassung, Beschreibung und Vermittlung wirksamer metakognitiver Strategien und Regulationsaktivitäten. Waxmann Verlag (2007) ISBN 3830918720Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Bonestroo, W., Kump, B., Ley, T., Lindstaedt, S.: Learn@Work: Competency Advancement with Learning Templates. In: Memmel, M., Ras, E., Wolpers, M., VanAssche, F. (eds.) Proceedings of the 3rd Workshop on Learner-Oriented Knowledge Management, pp. 9–16 (2007)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Choo, C.W.: The knowing organization. How organizations use information to construct meaning, create knowledge, and make decision. Oxford University Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Davenport, T.O.: Human Capital: What It Is and Why People Invest it. Jossey-Bass, San Francisco (1999)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Dillenbourg, P., Hong, F.: The mechanics of CSCL macro scripts. International Journal of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning H. 3, 5–23 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    de Hoog, R., Kabel, S., Barnard, Y., Boy, G., DeLuca, P., Desmoulins, C., Riemersma, J., Verstegen, D.: Re-using technical manuals for instruction: creating instructional material with the tools of the IMAT project. In: Workshop proceedings Integrating technical and training documentation, 6th International Intelligent Tutoring Systems conference (ITS 2002), San Sebástian, Spain, pp. 28–39 (2002)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Eraut, M., Hirsh, W.: The Significance of Workplace Learning for Individuals, Groups and Organisations. SKOPE Monograph, vol. 9. Oxford University: Department of Economics (2007)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Gery, G.: Electronic Performance Support Systems: how and why to remake the workplace through the strategic application of technology. Cambridge ZIFF Institute (1991) ISBN 0961796812Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Lindstaedt, S., Ley, T., Scheir, P., Ulbrich, A.: Applying Scruffy Methods to Enable Work-integrated Learning. The European Journal of the Informatics Professional 9(3), 44–50 (2008)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Scheir, P., Ghidini, C., Lindstaedt, S.N.: A Network Model Approach to Retrieval in the Semantic Web. In: Sheth, A. (ed.) International Journal on Semantic Web and Information Systems, vol. 4, pp. 56–84. IGI Global Publishers, Hershey (2008)Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Simons, P.R.J.: Towards a constructivistic theory of self-directed learning. In: Straka, G.A. (ed.) Conceptions of self-directed learning: theoretical and conceptional considerations, pp. 155–169. Waxmann, Münster (2000)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2009

Authors and Affiliations

  • Stefanie N. Lindstaedt
    • 1
  • Mario Aehnelt
    • 2
  • Robert de Hoog
    • 3
  1. 1.Know-Center and Knowledge Management InstituteGraz University of TechnologyAustria
  2. 2.Fraunhofer IGD RostockGermany
  3. 3.Faculty of Behavioral SciencesUniversity of TwenteEnschedeThe Netherlands

Personalised recommendations