Occlusion as a Monocular Depth Cue Derived from Illusory Contour Perception

  • Marcus Hund
  • Bärbel Mertsching
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 5803)


When a three dimensional scene is projected to the two dimensional receptive field of a camera or a biological vision system, all depth information is lost. Even without a knowledgebase, i. e. without knowing what object can be seen, it is possible to reconstruct the depth information. Beside stereoscopic depth cues, also a number of moncular depth cues can be used. One of the most important monocular depth cues ist the occlusion of object boundaries. Therefore one of the elaborated tasks for the low level image processing stage of a vision system is the completion of cluttered or occluded object boundaries and the depth assignment of overlapped boundaries. We describe a method for depth ordering and figure-ground segregation from monocular depth cues, namely the arrangement of so-called illusory contours at junctions in the edge map of an image. Therefore, a computational approach to the perception of illusory contours, based on the tensor voting technique, is introduced and compared with an alternative contour completion realized by spline interpolation. While most approaches assume, that the position of junctions and the orientations of associated contours are already known, we also consider the preprocessing steps that are necessary for a robust perception task. This implies the anisotropic diffusion of the input image in order to simplify the image contents while preserving the edge information.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. 1.
    Hansen, T.: A neural model of early vision: Contrast, contours, corners and surfaces. PhD thesis, Universität Ulm (2003)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Heitger, F., von der Heydt, R., Peterhans, E., Rosenthaler, L., Kübler, O.: Simulation of neural contour mechanisms: representing anomalous contours. Image Vision Comput. 16(6-7), 407–421 (1998)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Hund, M., Mertsching, B.: A Computational Approach to Illusory Contour Perception Based on the Tensor Voting Technique. In: Sanfeliu, A., Cortés, M.L. (eds.) CIARP 2005. LNCS, vol. 3773, pp. 71–80. Springer, Heidelberg (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Hund, M., Mertsching, B.: Anisotropic Diffusion by Quadratic Regularization. In: 3rd International Conference on Computer Vision Theory and Applications (VISAPP 2008) (January 2008)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Kellman, P.J., Guttman, S.E., Wickens, T.D.: Geometric and neural models of object perception. In: Shipley, T.F., Kellman, P.J. (eds.) From fragments to objects: Segmentation and grouping in vision. Elsevier Science, Oxford (2001)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Massad, A., Babos, M., Mertsching, B.: Perceptual grouping in grey level images by combination of gabor filtering and tensor voting. In: Kasturi, R., Laurendeau, D., Suen, C. (eds.) ICPR, vol. 2, pp. 677–680 (2002)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Massad, A., Medioni, G.: 2-D Shape Decomposition into Overlapping Parts. In: Arcelli, C., Cordella, L.P., Sanniti di Baja, G. (eds.) IWVF 2001. LNCS, vol. 2059, pp. 398–409. Springer, Heidelberg (2001)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Medioni, G., Lee, M.-S., Tang, C.-K.: A Computational Framework for Segmentation and Grouping. Elsevier Science, Amsterdam (2000)MATHGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Neumann, H., Mingolla, E.: Computational neural models of spatial integration in perceptual grouping. In: Shipley, T., Kellman, P. (eds.) From fragments to units: Segmentation and grouping in vision, pp. 353–400. Elsevier Science, Oxford (2001)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Nieder, A.: Seeing more than meets the eye: processing of illusory contours in animals. Journal of Comparative Physiology A: Sensory, Neural, and Behavioral Physiology 188(4), 249–260 (2002)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Saund, E.: Perceptual organization of occluding contours of opaque surfaces. Comput. Vis. Image Underst. 76(1), 70–82 (1999)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Williams, L.R., Hanson, A.R.: Perceptual completion of occluded surfaces. Computer Vision and Image Understanding: CVIU 64(1), 1–20 (1996)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Zweck, J.W., Williams, L.R.: Euclidean group invariant computation of stochastic completion fields using shiftable-twistable functions. In: Vernon, D. (ed.) ECCV 2000. LNCS, vol. 1843, pp. 100–116. Springer, Heidelberg (2000)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2009

Authors and Affiliations

  • Marcus Hund
    • 1
  • Bärbel Mertsching
    • 1
  1. 1.Dept. of Electrical Engineering, GET-LabUniversity of PaderbornPaderbornGermany

Personalised recommendations