Vocabulary Learning Environment with Collaborative Filtering for Support of Self-regulated Learning
This study elucidates issues related to using online vocabulary learning environments with collaborative filtering and functions for cognitive and social learning support in learner-centered learning, which requires learners to be self-regulated learners. The developed system provides learners with a vocabulary learning environment using online news as a test installation of functions. The system recommends news to each learner using a collaborative filtering algorithm. The system helps learners to use cognitive and social learning strategies such as underlining, along with a word-meaning display based on the learner’s vocabulary proficiency level. We investigated effects of the system on perceived usefulness and learning performance as a formative evaluation. Learners regarded this system as a useful tool for their language learning overall, but rated several functions low. Confirming the learning performance, the learner’s vocabulary proficiency level improved significantly.
KeywordsLanguage learning Educational technology Learning strategies Aptitude treatment interaction Collaborative filtering
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
- 1.Sakai, S.: A study on the relationship between developing learner autonomy and ICT in ELT. Journal of Multimedia Aided Education Research 6(1), 46–56 (2008)Google Scholar
- 3.Garcia, T., Pintrich, P.R.: Regulating motivation and cognition in the classroom: The role of self-schemas and self-regulatory strategies. In: Schunk, D.H., Zimmerman, B.J. (eds.) Self-regulation of learning and performance: Issues and educational applications, pp. 127–153. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Hillsdale (1994)Google Scholar
- 4.Hauck, M.: Metacognitive Knowledge, Metacognitive Strategies, and CALL. In: Egbert, J., Petrie, G.M. (eds.) CALL Research Perspectives, pp. 65–86 (2005)Google Scholar
- 5.Levy, M.: Computer-Assisted Language Learning – Context and Conceptualization. Oxford University Press, Oxford (1998)Google Scholar
- 6.Krashen, S.: The input hypothesis: Issues and implications. London House, Harlow (1985)Google Scholar
- 9.Cronbach, L.J.: How can instruction be adapted to individual differences? In: Gagne, R.M. (ed.) Learning and individual differences, pp. 23–39. Charles Merrill, OH, OH (1967)Google Scholar
- 10.Lou, Y., Dedic, H., Rosenfield, S.: A feedback model and successful e-learning. In: Naidu, S. (ed.) Learning & teaching with technology – Principles and practices (open & flexible learning series), pp. 249–259. Routledge, Falmer, OX, UK (2003)Google Scholar
- 11.Schunk, D.H., Zimmerman, B.J.: Motivation and Self-Regulated Learning: Theory, Research, and Applications. Routledge, Falmer, London, UK (2007)Google Scholar
- 12.Resnick, P., Iacovou, N., Suchak, M., Bergstrom, P., Riedl, J.: GroupLens: An open architecture for collaborative filtering of netnews. In: Proceedings of the ACM Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work, pp. 175–186 (1994)Google Scholar
- 13.Breese, J.S., Heckerman, D., Kadie, C.: Empirical analysis of predictive algorithms for collaborative filtering. Uncertainty in Artificial Intelligence 14, 43–52 (1998)Google Scholar
- 14.Herlocker, J.L., Konstan, J.A., Borchers, A., Riedl, J.: An algorithmic framework for performing collaborative filtering. In: Proceedings of 22nd Annual ACM SIGIR Conference on Research and Development in Information Retrieval, pp. 230–237 (1999)Google Scholar