Advertisement

Analysis of Educational Metadata Supporting Complex Learning Processes

  • Jorge Torres
  • Juan Manuel Dodero
Part of the Communications in Computer and Information Science book series (CCIS, volume 46)

Abstract

Educational metadata provide learning objects and designs with required information that is relevant to a learning situation. A learning design specifies how a learning process involves a set of people in specific groups and roles engaging learning activities with appropriate resources and services. These elements are usually described by using structured primitives of an Educational Modeling Language. Metadata records must explicitly provide a representation of the flow of learning activities and how learning resources and services are utilized. We have analyzed a number of common workflow patterns in order to extend current Educational Modeling Languages’ primitives used in complex learning flows. The information model of the Learning Process Execution and Composition Language is used as the basis to extend structured metadata required by such learning process descriptions.

Keywords

Learning Design Synchronization Point Metadata Record Structure Metadata Usual Learning 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Olivier, B., Tattersall, C.: The learning design specification. In: Koper, R., Tattersall, C. (eds.) Learning Design: A Handbook on Modelling and Delivering Networked Education and Training, pp. 21–40. Springer, Berlin (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Rawlings, A., van Rosmalen, P., Koper, R., Rodríguez-Artacho, M., Lefrere, P.: Survey of educational modelling languages (EML). Technical report, CEN/ISSS WS/LT (September 2002)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Koper, R.: Modeling units of study from a pedagogical perspective: the pedagogical metamodel behind eml. Technical report, Open University of the Netherlands (June 2001)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Koper, R.: Learning Design, A Handbook on Modelling and Delivering Networked Education and Training. Springer, Berlin (2005)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Russell, N., ter Hofstede, A., van der Aalst, W., Mulyar, N.: Workflow control-flow patterns: A revised view. Technical report, BPM Center (2006)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Dodero, J.M., Torres, J., Aedo, I., Díaz, P.: Beyond descriptive EML: Taking control of the execution of complex learning processes. In: Simposio Pluridisciplinar sobre Diseño, Evaluación y Descripción de Contenidos Educativos Reutilizables, Barcelona (2005)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Torres, J., Dodero, J.M., Aedo, I., Díaz, P.: Designing the execution of learning activities in complex learning processes using LPCEL. In: Proc. of the 6th ICALT, Kerkrade, The Netherlands, pp. 415–419 (2006)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Martínez-Ortiz, I., Moreno-Ger, P., Sierra-Rodríguez, J.L., Fernández-Manjón, B.: A flow-oriented visual language for learning designs. In: Li, F., Zhao, J., Shih, T.K., Lau, R., Li, Q., McLeod, D. (eds.) ICWL 2008. LNCS, vol. 5145, pp. 486–496. Springer, Heidelberg (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Dalziel, J.R.: Implementing learning design: The learning activity management system (LAMS). In: Crisp, G., Thiele, D., Scholten, I., Barker, S., Baron, J. (eds.) Proc. of the 20th ASCILITE, Adelaide, Australia (2004)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Hagen, K., Hibbert, D., Kinshuk, P.: Developing a learning management system based on the IMS Learning Design specification. In: Proc. of the 6th ICALT, Kerkrade, The Netherlands, pp. 420–424 (2006)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Gutiérrez-Santos, S., Pardo, A., Delgado-Kloos, C.: Authoring courses with rich adaptive sequencing for IMS learning design. Journal of Universal Computer Science 14(17), 2819–2839 (2008)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Dodero, J.M., Torres, J.: Awareness of execution in designing learning activities with LAMS and IMS LD. In: European LAMS Conference, Cádiz, Spain (2008)Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Hollingsworth, D.: The workflow reference model - issue 1.1. Specification TC00-1003, Workflow Management Coalition, Winchester, Hampshire, UK (January 1995)Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Bhiri, S., Perrin, O., Godart, C.: Extending workflow patterns with transactional dependencies to define reliable composite web services. In: Advanced International Conference on Telecommunications and International Conference on Internet and Web Applications and Services, p. 145 (2006)Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Torres, J., Juárez, E., Dodero, J.M., Aedo, I.: Advanced transactional models for a new generation of educational modelling language engines. In: Proc. of the 8th ICALT, Riga, Latvia (2008) (to be published)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2009

Authors and Affiliations

  • Jorge Torres
    • 1
  • Juan Manuel Dodero
    • 2
  1. 1.Tecnologico de MonterreyMéxico
  2. 2.Universidad de CádizSpain

Personalised recommendations