Clarifying the Semantics of Relationships between Learning Objects

  • M. Elena Rodríguez
  • Jordi Conesa
  • Miguel Ángel Sicilia
Part of the Communications in Computer and Information Science book series (CCIS, volume 46)

Abstract

In this paper we discuss about the ambiguities and deficiencies of the Learning Object Metadata (LOM) standard to specify relationships between learning objects (LOs), specially those relationships that relate LOs instances. We also study the impact of relationships in the internal organizational structure of LOs. As main contribution, we develop a taxonomy of possible relationships between LOs that has been created by refining the LOM standard relationships with other meaningful relationships from a common sense ontology.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Al-Khalifa, H.S., Davis, H.C.: The Evolution of Metadata from Standards to Semantics in E-Learning Applications. In: 17th ACM Conference on Hypertext and Hypermedia Systems (2006)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Conesa, J., Storey, V.C., Sugumaran, V.: Usability of Upper Level Ontologies: The Case of Research Cyc. Accepted Manuscript to appear in Data & Knowledge Engineering (2009)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Conesa, J., Olivé, A.: A Method for Prunning Ontologies in the Development of Conceptual Schemas of Information Systems. Journal of Data Semantics 5, 64–90 (2006)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    El Saddik, A., Fischer, S., Steinmetz, R.: Reusability and Adaptability of Interactive Resources in Computing. ACM Journal of Educational Resources in Computing 1(1), Article 4 (2001)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Fischer, S.: Course and Exercise Sequencing Using Metadata in Adaptative Hypermedia Learning Systems. ACM Journal of Educational Resources in Computing 1(1), Article 5 (2001)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Haase, K.: Context for Semantic Metadata. In: 12th Annual ACM International Conference on Multimedia, pp. 204–211. ACM, New York (2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    ISO/IEC JTC1 SC36: Final Report on the International LOM Survey (2004)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Kabel, S., de Hoog, R., Wielinga, B., Anjewierden, A.: Indexing Learning Objects: Vocabularies and Empirical Investigation of Consistency. Journal of Educational Multimedia and Hypermedia 13(4), 405–425 (2004)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Koper, R., Oliver, B.: Representing the Learning Design of Unit of learning. Educational Technology and Society 7(3), 97–111 (2004)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    LTCS WG12: IEEE Learning Technology Standards Committee. Draft Standard for Learning Object Metadata. Technical Report 1484.12.1, IEEE Inc. (2002)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Lu, J.E., Hsieb, C.: A Relation Metadata Extension for SCORM Content Aggregation Model. Computer Standards and Interfaces (2008)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Olivé, A.: Conceptual Modeling of Information Systems. Springer, Heidelberg (2007)MATHGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
  14. 14.
    Rodríguez, M.E., Conesa, J., García-Barriocanal, E., Sicilia, M.A.: Conceptual Interpretation of LOM and its Mapping to Common Sense Ontologies. In: International Conference on Semantics Systems, pp. 126–133. Journal of Universal Computer Science, Graz (2008)Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Sánchez, S., Sicilia, M.A.: On the Semantics of Aggregation and Generalization in Learning Object Contracts. In: 4th IEEE International Conference on Advanced Learning Technologies, pp. 425–429. IEEE Press, Joensuu (2004)Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Sicilia, M.A.: Metadata, Semantics and Ontology: Providing Meaning to Information Resources. International Journal of Metadata, Semantics and Ontologies 1(1), 83–86 (2006)MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Yahya, Y., Yussoff, M.: Towards a Comprehensive Learning Object Metadata: Incorporation of Context to Stipulate Meaningful Learning and Enhance Learning Object Reusability. Interdisciplinary Journal of E-Learning and Learning Objects 4 (2008)Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Zouaq, A., Nkambou, R., Frasson, C.: An Integrated Approach for Automatic Aggregation of Learning Knowledge Objects. Interdisciplinary Journal of Knowledge and Learning Objects 3 (2007)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2009

Authors and Affiliations

  • M. Elena Rodríguez
    • 1
  • Jordi Conesa
    • 1
  • Miguel Ángel Sicilia
    • 2
  1. 1.Estudis d’InformàticaMultimèdia i TelecomunicacióBarcelona
  2. 2.Departamento de Ciencias de la ComputaciónUniversidad de AlcaláAlcalá de Henares

Personalised recommendations