Advertisement

Modeling Context for Digital Preservation

  • Holger Brocks
  • Alfred Kranstedt
  • Gerald Jäschke
  • Matthias Hemmje
Part of the Studies in Computational Intelligence book series (SCI, volume 260)

Abstract

Digital preservation can be regarded as ensuring communication with the future, that means ensuring the persistence of digital resources, rendering them findable, accessible and understandable for supporting contemporary reuse as well as safeguarding the interests of future generations. The context of a digital object to be preserved over time comprises the representation of all known properties associated with it and of all operations that have been carried out on it. This implies the information needed to decode the data stream and to restore the original content, information about its creation environment, including the actors and resources involved, and information about the organizational and technical processes associated with the production, preservation, access and reuse of the digital object. In this article we propose a generic context model which provides a formal representation for capturing all these aspects, to enable retracing information paths for future reuse. Building on experiences with the preservation of digital documents in so-called memory institutions, we demonstrate the feasibility of our approach within the domain of scientific publishing.

Keywords

Digital Object Context Model Information Package Digital Archive Digital Preservation 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    van der Aalst, W., van Hee, K.: Workflow management: models, methods, and systems. MIT Press, Cambridge (2002)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    van der Aalst, W.M.P., ter Hofstede, A.H.M., Weske, M.: Business process management: A survey. In: van der Aalst, W.M.P., ter Hofstede, A.H.M., Weske, M. (eds.) BPM 2003. LNCS, vol. 2678, pp. 1–12. Springer, Heidelberg (2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Ball, A.: Briefing paper: the oais reference model. Briefing paper, UKOLN, University of Bath (2006), http://www.ukoln.ac.uk/projects/grand-challenge/papers/oaisBriefing.pdf
  4. 4.
    Bolchini, C., Curino, C.A., Quintarelli, E., Schreiber, F.A., Tanca, L.: A data-oriented survey of context models. SIGMOD Rec. 36(4), 19–26 (2007), http://www.sigmod.org/sigmod/record/issues/0712/p19.cesar-curino.pdf CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Brocks, H., Begger, C., Kamps, T.: Process ontologies for IT-Services. In: Zimmer, F., Mohammadian, M., Khadraoui, D. (eds.) Proceedings of the international conference on Advances in Intelligent Systems - Theory and Applications, AISTA 2004 (2004)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Brocks, H., Meyer, H., Kamps, T., Begger, C.: The extended process model - unifying knowledge and process. In: Abramowicz, W. (ed.) Proceedings Business Information Systems, 8th International Conference on Business Information Systems, pp. 242–257. Wydawnictwo Akademii Ekonomiczney w Poznaniu, Poznan (2005)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Brocks, H., Meyer, H., Kamps, T., Begger, C.: The extended process model - transforming process specifications into ontological representations. Cybernetics and Systems 37(2-3), 261–281 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    CCSDS: Reference model for an open archival information system (oais). Blue Book 1, Consultative Committee for Space Data Systems (2002), http://public.ccsds.org/publications/archive/650x0b1.pdf, Recommendation for Space Data Systems Standards, adopted as ISO 14721:2003
  9. 9.
    Committee, P.E.: Premis data dictionary for preservation metadata version 2.0. Tech. rep., Library of Congress (2008), http://www.loc.gov/standards/premis/v2/premis-2-0.pdf
  10. 10.
    Crofts, N., Doerr, M., Gill, T., Stead, S., Stiff, M.: Definition of the cidoc conceptual reference model. Tech. rep., ICOM/CIDOC CRM Special Interests Group (2009), http://cidoc.ics.forth.gr/docs/cidoc_crm_version_5.0.1_Mar09.pdf, ISO 21127:2006
  11. 11.
    Doerr, M., Hunter, J., Lagozw, C.: Towards a core ontology for information integration. Journal of Digital Information 4(1) (2003), http://www.itee.uq.edu.au/~eresearch/papers/2003/JODI/_Oct2002.pdf
  12. 12.
    Fox, M., Barbuceanu, M., Gruninger, M., Lin, J.: An organization ontology for enterprise modelling. In: Prietula, M., Carley, K. Gasser, L. (eds.) Simulating Organizations: Computational Models of Institutions and Groups, pp. 131–152 (1997)Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Fox, M., Gruninger, M.: Enterprise modelling. AI Magazine, 109–121 (1998)Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Gruber, T.R.: A translation approach to portable ontology specifications. Knowl. Acquis. 5(2), 199–220 (1993)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Grüninger, M., Pinto, J.: A theory of complex actions for enterprise modelling. In: Symposium Extending Theories of Action: Formal Theory and Practical Applications, pp. 94–99 (1995)Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Guarino, N.: Formal ontology and information systems. In: Guarino, N. (ed.) Proceedings of the 1st International Conference on Formal Ontologies in Information Systems, FOIS 1998, pp. 3–15 (1998)Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    JISC: Digital preservation - continued access to authentic digital assets. Briefing paper, Joint Information Systems Committe (2006), http://www.jisc.ac.uk/media/documents/publications/digitalpreservationbp.pdf
  18. 18.
    Kaenampornpan, M., O’Neill, E., Ay, B.B.: An integrated context model: Bringing activity to context. In: Workshop on Advanced Context Modelling, Reasoning and Management - UbiComp (2004), http://www.itee.uq.edu.au/~pace/cw2004/Paper17.pdf
  19. 19.
    Lagoze, C., Hunter, J.: The ABC Ontology and Model. Journal of Digital Information 2(2) (Article No. 77, 2001-11-06) (2001)Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Lagoze, C., de Sompel, H.V., Nelson, M.L., Warner, S., Sanderson, R., Johnston, P.: Object re-use & exchange: A resource-centric approach. CoRR abs/0804.2273 (2008)Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Lavoie, B., Dempsey, L.: Thirteen ways of looking at..digital preservation. D-Lib Magazine 10(7/8) (2004), http://dlib.org/dlib/july04/lavoie/07lavoie.html
  22. 22.
    Mädche, A., Staab, S., Studer, R.: Stichwort ontologien. Wirtschaftsinformatik, WI-Schlagwort 4 (2001)Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Marinescu, D.C.: Internet-Based Workflow Management: Toward a Semantic Web. Wiley Interscience, Hoboken (2002)Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    McDonough, J.: Aligning METS with the OAI-ORE Data Model. In: Proceedings 9the ACM/IEEE-CS Joint Conference on Digital Libraries, ACM, New York (2009) (to be published), https://www.ideals.uiuc.edu/handle/2142/10744 Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Moreau, L., Plale, B., Miles, S., Goble, C., Missier, P., Barga, R., Simmhan, Y., Futrelle, J., McGrath, R.E., Myers, J., Paulson, P., Bowers, S., Ludaescher, B., Kwasnikowska, N., den Bussche, J.V., Ellkvist, T., Freire, L., Groth, P.: The open provenance model (v1.01). Tech. rep., University of Southampton (2008), http://eprints.ecs.soton.ac.uk/16148/1/opm-v1.01.pdf
  26. 26.
    Nussbaumer, P., Haslhofer, B.: Putting the cidoc crm into practice. experiences and challenges. Tech. rep., University of Vienna (2007), http://www.cs.univie.ac.at/upload/550/papers/putting_the_cidoc_crm_into_practice.pdf
  27. 27.
    Partners, D.: DPE digital preservation research roadmap. Public Deliverable D7.2, DigitalPreservationEurope (2007), http://www.digitalpreservationeurope.eu/publications/reports/dpe_research_roadmap_D72.pdf
  28. 28.
    Reijers, H.A.: Design and Control of Workflow Processes: Business Process Management for the Service Industry. In: Reijers, H.A. (ed.) Design and Control of Workflow Processes. LNCS, vol. 2617. Springer, Heidelberg (2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Schwarz, S.: Task-Konzepte: Struktur und Semantik für Workflows. In: Reimer, U., Abecker, A., Staab, S., Stumme, G. (eds.) WM 2003: Professionelles Wissesmanagement - Erfahrungen. GI (2003)Google Scholar
  30. 30.
    Schwens, U., Liegmann, H.: Langzeitarchivierung digitaler Ressourcen. In: Kuhlen, R., Seeger, T., Strauch, D. (eds.) Handbuch zur Einführung in die Informationswissenschaft und -praxis. Grundlagen der praktischen Information und Dokumentation, ch. D9, vol. 1, 5, völlig neu gefasste Ausgabe edn, pp. 567–570. Saur, München (2004), http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:0008-2005110800 Google Scholar
  31. 31.
    Theodoridou, M., Tzitzikas, Y., Doerr, M., Marketakis, Y., Melessanakis, V.: Modeling and querying provenance using cidoc crm. Tech. rep., Institute of Computer Science, FORTH-ICS (2008), http://www.casparpreserves.eu/Members/metaware/Papers/modeling-and-querying-provenance-using-cidoc-crm/at_download/file Draft 0.94
  32. 32.
    Uschold, M., King, M., Moralee, S., Zorgios, Y.: The Enterprise Ontology. The Knowledge Engineering Review 13 (1998); Special Issue on Putting Ontologies to UseGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Verheul, I.: Networking for Digital Preservation: Current Practice in 15 National Libraries. K.G. Saur, Munich (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2010

Authors and Affiliations

  • Holger Brocks
    • 1
  • Alfred Kranstedt
    • 2
  • Gerald Jäschke
    • 3
  • Matthias Hemmje
    • 1
  1. 1.Chair of Multimedia and Internet ApplicationsFernUniversität in HagenHagen
  2. 2.Deutsche NationalbibliothekFrankfurt am Main
  3. 3.Globale Informationstechnik GmbHDarmstadt

Personalised recommendations