Tonal, Atonal and Microtonal Pitch-Class Categories

  • Fernando Gualda
Part of the Communications in Computer and Information Science book series (CCIS, volume 37)

Abstract

This paper reviews and generalizes Pitch-Class Set Theory using Group Theory (groups acting on pc-sets) and Category Theory, which provides methods for mapping the structure of a n-tone system onto another m-tone system. This paper also suggests a new implementation approach that represents pitch-class sets as bit-sequences, which are equivalent to integer values. Forte’s best normal order is shown to be equivalent to the smallest integer, among the cyclic permuted pc-sets. Further, transposition of pc-sets is shown to be equivalent to bit-shifts; and their inversion, to bit-reversal. The tonal (diatonic) pc-category is presented as a subset of the atonal (12-tone) pc-category, which, similarly, can also be contained in a microtonal pc-category. Functors between those categories present properties that preserve relationships while still using the same operations: tonal relationships are preserved even though atonal music operations, such as transposition and inversion are applied, allowing motives to be mapped into different modes, scales, or even microtonal scales. The appendix offers an implementation of this new approach to calculate and represent pc-sets with an arbitrary number of pitch-classes.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Babbitt, M.: Twelve-Tone Invariants as Compositional Determinants. Musical Quarterly 46(2), 246–259 (1960)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Babbitt, M.: Set Structure and a Compositional Determinant. Journal of Music Theory 5(1), 72–94 (1961)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Barr, M., Wells, C.: Category Theory for Computer Science, 2nd edn. Prentice Hall, London (1995)Google Scholar
  4. Forte, A.: The Structure of Atonal Music. Yale University Press, Haven (1973)Google Scholar
  5. Huron, D.: Sweet Anticipation: Music and the Psychology of Expectation. MIT Press, Cambridge (2006)Google Scholar
  6. Kopp, D.: Chromatic Transformations in Nineteenth-Century Music. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (2002)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Lawvere, F.W., Schanuel, S.H.: Conceptual Mathematics. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (1997)MATHGoogle Scholar
  8. Mazzola, G.: The Topos of Music. Birkhäuser, Basel (2006)Google Scholar
  9. Guerino, M., Weissmann, J., Milmeister, G.: Comprehensive Mathematics for Computer Scientists 1, 2nd edn. Springer, Berlin (2006)MATHGoogle Scholar
  10. Morris, R.: Set Groups, Complementation, and Mappings among Pitch-Class Sets. Journal of Music Theory 26(1), 101–144 (1982)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Morris, R.: Mathematics and the twelve-tone system: past, present, and future. In: Klouche, T., Noll, T. (eds.) MCM 2007. CCIS, vol. 37, pp. 427–437. Springer, Heidelberg (2009)Google Scholar
  12. Parncutt, R.: Tonal implications of harmonic and melodic Tn-types. In: Klouche, T., Noll, T. (eds.) MCM 2007. CCIS, vol. 37, pp. 427–437. Springer, Heidelberg (2009)Google Scholar
  13. Rahn, J.: Basic Atonal Theory, pp. 31–39. Longman, New York (1980)Google Scholar
  14. Schoenberg, A.: Theory of Harmony, 3rd edn. (1978/1922). University of California Press, Los Angeles (1922); Translated by Roy E. Carter BerkeleyGoogle Scholar
  15. Straus, J.N.: Introduction to Post-Tonal Theory. Prentice-Hall, Cliffs (1990)Google Scholar
  16. Walters, R.F.C.: Categories and Computer Science. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (1991)MATHGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2009

Authors and Affiliations

  • Fernando Gualda
    • 1
  1. 1.Sonic Arts Research CentreQueen’s University BelfastUK

Personalised recommendations