Investigating the Impact of Aircraft Exit Availability on Egress Time Using Computer Simulation

  • Edwin R. Galea
  • Madeleine Togher
  • Peter Lawrence
Conference paper


This paper examines the influence of exit availability on evacuation time for narrow body aircraft under certification trial conditions using computer simulation. A narrow body aircraft which has previously passed the certification trial is used as the test configuration. While maintaining the certification requirement of 50% of the available exits, six different exit configurations are examined. These include the standard certification configuration and five other exit configurations based on commonly occurring exit combinations found in accidents. These configurations are based on data derived from the AASK database and the evacuation simulations are performed using the airEXODUS evacuation software. The results show that the certification practise of using half of the available exits predominately down one side of the aircraft is neither statistically relevant nor challenging. For the aircraft cabin layout examined, the exit configuration used in certification trial produces the shortest egress times. Furthermore, three of the six exit combinations investigated result in predicted egress times in excess of 90 seconds, suggesting that the aircraft would not satisfy the certification requirement under these conditions.


Evacuation Time Exit Zone Evacuation Simulation Egress Time Cabin Crew 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. 1.
    FAR Part 25.807 Airworthiness Standards. Transport Category Airplanes. Including amendment 25-67 as published in the Federal Register on June 16th, 1989, Washington DC, USA, 1989. Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    E.R. Galea, K.M. Finney, A.J.P. Dixon, A. Siddiqui, and D.P. Cooney, The AASK DATABASE V4.0: Aircraft Accident Statistics and Knowledge. A Database to Record Human Experience of Evacuation in Aviation Accidents. Report for CAA Project 560/SRG/R+AD, Dec 2003. Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    E.R. Galea, K.M. Finney, A.J.P. Dixon, A. Siddiqui, and D.P. Cooney, “An analysis of exit availability, exit usage and passenger exit selection behaviour exhibited during actual aviation accidents”. The Aeronautical Journal of the Royal Aeronautical Society, Vol 110, Number 1106, pp 239–248, 2006. Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    S. Blake, E.R. Galea, S. Gwynne, P. Lawrence, and L. Filippidis, “Examining the effect of exit separation on aircraft evacuation performance during 90-second certification trials using evacuation modelling techniques”. The Aeronautical Journal of the Royal Aeronautical Society, Vol 106, pp 1–16, 2002. Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    E.R. Galea, S. Blake, S. Gwynne, and P. Lawrence, “The use of evacuation modelling techniques in the design of very large transport aircraft and blended wing body aircraft”. The Aeronautical Journal, Vol 107, Number 1070, pp 207–218, 2003. Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    E.R. Galea, “Proposed methodology for the use of computer simulation to enhance aircraft evacuation certification”. AIAA Journal of Aircraft, Vol 43, Number 5, pp 1405–1413, 2006. CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2010

Authors and Affiliations

  • Edwin R. Galea
    • 1
  • Madeleine Togher
    • 1
  • Peter Lawrence
    • 1
  1. 1.Fire Safety Engineering GroupUniversity of GreenwichLondonUK

Personalised recommendations