Prediction and Mitigation of Crush Conditions in Emergency Evacuations
Several simulation environments exist for the simulation of large-scale evacuations of buildings, ships, or other enclosed spaces. These offer sophisticated tools for the study of human behaviour, the recreation of environmental factors such as fire or smoke, and the inclusion of architectural or structural features, such as elevators, pillars and exits. Although such simulation environments can provide insights into crowd behaviour, they lack the ability to examine potentially dangerous forces building up within a crowd. These are commonly referred to as crush conditions, and are a common cause of death in emergency evacuations.
In this paper, we describe a methodology for the prediction and mitigation of crush conditions. The paper is organised as follows. We first establish the need for such a model, defining the main factors that lead to crush conditions, and describing several exemplar case studies. We then examine current methods for studying crush, and describe their limitations. From this, we develop a three-stage hybrid approach, using a combination of techniques. We conclude with a brief discussion of the potential benefits of our approach.
KeywordsSimulation Environment International Maritime Organisation Evacuation Plan Crowd Behaviour Emergency Evacuation
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
- 1.J. Sime. Escape behaviour in fires and evacuations. In Design Against Fire, Chapman & Hall, London, 1994. Google Scholar
- 2.W. Grosshandler, N. Bryner, D. Madrzykowski, and K. Kuntz. Report of the technical investigation of the station nightclub fire. Technical report, NIST, 2005. Google Scholar
- 3.E. Comeau and R.F. Duval. Dance hall fire Gothenburg, Sweden, October 28, 1998. Technical report, National Fire Protection Association, 2000. Google Scholar
- 4.Final report on the collapse of the World Trade Center towers. Technical report, NIST, 2005. Google Scholar
- 5.J. Fruin. Pedestrian Planning and Design. Metropolitan Association of Urban Designers and Environmental Planners, Alabama, 1971. Google Scholar
- 6.IMO. Interim guidelines for evacuation analyses for new and existing passenger ships. Technical report, International Maritime Organisation, 2002. Google Scholar
- 7.J. Sime. An occupant responses escape time (ORET) model. In Proceedings of the First International Symposium, 1998. Google Scholar
- 8.J. Wilgoren. 21 die in stampede of 1,500 at Chicago nightclub. New York Times, 18.02.2003. Google Scholar
- 9.The Hillsborough stadium disaster: final report. Technical report, U.K. Home Office, 1989. Google Scholar
- 10.E. Kuligowski. Review of 28 egress models. In Workshop on Building Occupant Movement During Fire Emergencies, 2004. Google Scholar
- 13.J.-M. Kuusinen. Group behavior in FDS+evac evacuation simulations. Published online, August 2007. Google Scholar
- 16.M. Longair. Theoretical Concepts in Physics: An Alternative View of Theoretical Reasoning in Physics, 2 edition. Cambridge Univ. Press, Cambridge, 2003. Google Scholar
- 17.A. Kraskov, H. Stogbauer, and P. Grassberger. Estimating mutual information. Phys. Rev. E, 69, 2004. Google Scholar
- 18.R. Wicks, S. Chapman, and R. Dendy. Mutual information as a tool for identifying phase transitions in dynamical complex systems with limited data. Phys. Rev. E, 75(5), 2007. Google Scholar
- 22.J. Wittenburg. Dynamics of Multibody Systems: Dynamics of Systems of Rigid Bodies. Springer, Berlin, 2007. Google Scholar
- 24.L.U. Chunxia. Analysis of compressed force in crowds. J. Transp. Eng. Inf., 7(2):98–103, 2007. Google Scholar