Advertisement

Automated and Distributed Network Service Monitoring

  • Giovan Germoglio
  • Bruno Dias
  • Pedro Sousa
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 5787)

Abstract

Decentralized architectures have been proposed using functional hierarchies of several middle-level managers with delegation of management activities. However, no management applications have been implemented and widely used that could sanction this approach for real use. Also, current frameworks or mechanisms in network management do not directly address automation. More efficient network management systems with higher levels of availability and automation are needed. In this paper we propose a design and specify an automated and distributed network services monitoring system for Internet services that should be capable to effectively gather and calculate relevant operational parameters that will be used to determine the availability level of a network or application service. Based on this availability level, the system recommends or automatically triggers a service reconfiguration or a total or partial network service replication.

Keywords

Network Services Management Automation Distributed Monitoring 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Matthews, W., Cottrell, L.: The PingER project: active Internet performance monitoring for the HENP community. IEEE Communications Magazine 38, 130–136 (2000)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Fu, Y., Cherkasova, L., Tang, W., Vahdat, A.: EtE: Passive End-to-End Internet Service Performance Monitoring. In: USENIX Annual Technical Conference (2002)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Chen, T.M., Hu, L.: Internet performance monitoring. In: IEEE, pp. 1592–1603 (2002)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Fuggetta, A., Picco, G.P., Vigna, G.: Understanding code mobility. IEEE Trans. Soft. Engineering 24, 342–361 (1998)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Chen, T.M., Liu, S.S.: A model and evaluation of distributed network management approaches. IEEE J. on Selec. Areas in Comm. 20, 850–857 (2002) Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Gunter, M., Braun, T.: Internet service monitoring with mobile agents. IEEE Network 16, 22–29 (2002)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Choi, M., Jong, J.: Performance Evaluation of XML-based Network Management. In: 16th IRTF-NMRG meeting (2004)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Choi, M., Hong, J., Ju, H.: JXML-Based Network Management for IP Networks. ETRI J. 25, 445–463 (2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Pras, A., Drevers, T., van de Meent, R., Quartel, D.: Comparing the Performance of SNMP and Web Services based Management. In: IEEE electronic Transactions on Network and Service Management, vol. 1 (2004)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Rose, M., McCloghrie, K.: Structure and Identification of Management Information for TCP/IP-based Internets. RFC 1155 (May 1990)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    McCloghrie, K., Rose, M.: Management Information Base for Network Management of TCP/IP-based internets. RFC 1156 (May 1990)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Chadwick, D., Mundy, D.: Comparing the Performance of Abstract Syntax Notation One (ASN.1) vs eXtensible Markup Language (XML). In: TERENA Networking Conference (2003)Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    ITU-T Rec. X.701: Information Technology – Open Systems Interconnection. Systems Management Overview (1992) Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Moore, B., Ellesson, E., Strassner, J., Westerinen, A.: Policy Core Information Model. RFC 3060 (February 2001)Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Distributed Management Task Force (DMTF): Common Information Model (CIM) Standards, http://www.dmtf.org/standards/cim/
  16. 16.
    Boyle, J., Cohen, R., Herzog, S., Rajan, R., Sastry, A.: The Common Open Policy Service Protocol. In: Durham, D. (ed.) RFC 2748 (January 2000)Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Jacobson, V.: Traceroute (1989)Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Augustin, B., Cuvellier, X., Orgogozo, B., Viger, F., Friedman, T., Latapy, M., Magnien, C., Teixeira, R.: Avoiding traceroute anomalies with Paris traceroute. In: ACM SIGCOMM Internet Measurement Conference, pp. 153–158 (2006)Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Augustin, B., Friedman, T., Teixeira, R.: Multipath tracing with Paris traceroute. In: Workshop on End-to-End Monitoring Techniques and Services, pp. 1–8 (2007)Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Augustin, B., Friedman, T., Teixeira, R.: Measuring load-balanced paths in the Internet. In: 7th ACM SIGCOMM conference on Internet measurement, pp. 149–160 (2007)Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Luckie, M., Hyun, Y., Huffaker, B.: Traceroute probe method and forward IP path inference. In: 8th ACM SIGCOMM conference on Internet measurement, pp. 311–324 (2008)Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Archipelago measurement infrastructure, http://www.caida.org/projects/ark/
  23. 23.
    RIPE NCC DNS Monitoring Services, http://dnsmon.ripe.net/dns-servmon/about.html
  24. 24.
    Weimer, F.: Passive DNS replication. In: FIRST Conference on Computer Security Incident Handling (2005)Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Newman, H.B., Legrand, I.C., Galvez, P., Cirstoiu, C.: MonALISA: A distribute monitoring service architecture. In: 2003 Conference for Computing in High-Enery and Nuclear Physics (2003)Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    Choi, Y., Hwang, I.: In-service QoS monitoring of real-time applications using SM MIB. Int. J. Net. Man 15, 31–42 (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2009

Authors and Affiliations

  • Giovan Germoglio
    • 1
  • Bruno Dias
    • 1
  • Pedro Sousa
    • 1
  1. 1.Centro de Ciências e Tecnologias da Computação, Departamento de InformáticaUniversidade do MinhoBragaPortugal

Personalised recommendations