EuroSSC 2009: Smart Sensing and Context pp 163-176 | Cite as

Recognizing the Use-Mode of Kitchen Appliances from Their Current Consumption

  • Gerald Bauer
  • Karl Stockinger
  • Paul Lukowicz
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 5741)

Abstract

This paper builds on previous work by different authors on monitoring the use of household devices through analysis of the power line current. Whereas previous work dealt with detecting which device is being used, we go a step further and analyze how the device is being used. We focus on a kitchen scenario where many different devices are relevant to activity recognition. The paper describes a smart, easy to install sensor that we have built to do the measurements and the algorithms which can for example determine the consistency of the substance in the mixer, how many eggs are being boiled (and if they are soft or hard), what size of coffee has been prepared or whether a cutting machine was used to cut bread or salami. A set of multi user experiments has been performed to validate the algorithms.

Keywords

Activity Recognition Current Consumption Current Transformer Chocolate Milk Ambient Assisted Living 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Bauer, G., Lukowicz, P.: Developing a Sub Room Level Indoor Location System for Wide Scale Deployment in Assisted Living Systems. In: Miesenberger, K., Klaus, J., Zagler, W.L., Karshmer, A.I. (eds.) ICCHP 2008. LNCS, vol. 5105, pp. 1057–1064. Springer, Heidelberg (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Ibarz, A., Bauer, G., Casas, R., Marco, A., Lukowicz, P.: Design and Evaluation of a Sound Based Water Flow Measurement System. In: Roggen, D., Lombriser, C., Tröster, G., Kortuem, G., Havinga, P. (eds.) EuroSSC 2008. LNCS, vol. 5279, pp. 41–54. Springer, Heidelberg (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Patel, S.N., Robertson, T., Kientz, A.J., Reynolds, M.S., Abowd, G.D.: At the Flick of a Switch: Detecting and Classifying Unique Electrical Events on the Residential Power Line. In: Krumm, J., Abowd, G.D., Seneviratne, A., Strang, T. (eds.) UbiComp 2007. LNCS, vol. 4717, pp. 271–288. Springer, Heidelberg (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Berenguer, M., Giordani, M., Giraud-By, F., Noury, N.: Automatic detection of Activities of Daily Living from Detecting and Classifying Electrical Events on the Residential Power Line. In: Proc. 10th IEEE Intl. Conference on e-Health Networking, Applications and Service, HEALTHCOM 2008 (2008)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Fogarty, J., Au, C., Hudson, S.E.: Sensing from the basement: a feasibility study of unobtrusive and low-cost home activity recognition. In: Proceedings of the 19th Annual ACM Symposium on User Interface Software and Technology, Montreux, Switzerland (October 15-18, 2006)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Chen, J., Harvey Kam, A., Zhang, J., Liu, N., Shue, L.: Bathroom Activity Monitoring Based on Sound. In: Gellersen, H.-W., Want, R., Schmidt, A. (eds.) PERVASIVE 2005. LNCS, vol. 3468, pp. 47–61. Springer, Heidelberg (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Logan, B., Healey, J., Philipose, M., Tapia, E.M., Intille, S.: A long-term evaluation of sensing modalities for activity recognition. In: Krumm, J., Abowd, G.D., Seneviratne, A., Strang, T. (eds.) UbiComp 2007. LNCS, vol. 4717, pp. 483–500. Springer, Heidelberg (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Lifton, J., Feldmeier, M., Ono, Y., Lewis, C., Paradiso, J.A.: A platform for ubiquitous sensor deployment in occupational and domestic environments. In: Proceedings of the 6th international conference on Information processing in sensor networks, pp. 119–127 (2007)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Patel, S.N., Reynolds, M.S., Abowd, G.D.: Detecting human movement by differential air pressure sensing in HVAC system ductwork: An exploration in infrastructure mediated sensing. In: Indulska, J., Patterson, D.J., Rodden, T., Ott, M. (eds.) PERVASIVE 2008. LNCS, vol. 5013, pp. 1–18. Springer, Heidelberg (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Schmidt, A., Beigl, M., Gellersen, H.W.: There is more to context than location. Computers & Graphics 23(6), 893–901 (1999)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Stäger, M., Lukowicz, P., Tröster, G.: Power and accuracy trade-offs in sound-based context recognition systems. Pervasive and Mobile Computing 3(3), 300–327 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2009

Authors and Affiliations

  • Gerald Bauer
    • 1
  • Karl Stockinger
    • 1
  • Paul Lukowicz
    • 1
  1. 1.Embedded Systems LabUniversity of PassauPassauGermany

Personalised recommendations