Information Foraging Theory as a Form of Collective Intelligence for Social Search
The World Wide Web is growing in size and with the proliferation of large-scale collaborative computing environments Social search has become increasingly important. The focal point of this recent field is to assign relevance and trustworthiness to web-pages by taking into account the reader’s perspective rather than web-masters’ point of view. Current web-searching technologies tend to rely on explicit human recommendations, in part because it is hard to obtain user’ feedback however these methods are hard to scale. Implicit feedback techniques are a potentially useful alternative. The challenge is in producing implicit web-rankings by reasoning over users’ activity during a web-search but without recourse to explicit human intervention. This paper focuses on a novel Social Search formal model based on Information Foraging Theory, showing a different way to implicitly judge web entities by considering effort expended by users in viewing them. 100 university students were recruited to explicitly evaluate the usefulness of 12 thematic web-sites and an experiment was performed implicitly gathering their web-browsing activity. Correlation indexes were adopted and encouraging results where obtained suggesting the existence of a considerable relationship between explicit feedback and implicit derived judgements. Furthermore, a comparison of the results obtained and the results provided by Google was performed. The proposed nature-inspired approach shows that, by considering the same searching query, Social search to be more effective than the Google Page-Rank Algorithm. This evidence supports the presentation of a novel general schema for a Social search engine generating implicit web-rankings by taking into account the Collective Intelligence emerged from users by reasoning on their behaviour.
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
- 1.Stephens, D.W., Krebs, J.R.: Foraging Theory, Princeton, NJ (1986)Google Scholar
- 4.Miller, C.S., Remington, R.W.: Modeling Information Navigation: implications for Information Architecture. In: HCI (2004)Google Scholar
- 5.Kitajima, M., Blackmon, M.H., Polson, P.G.: Cognitive Architecture for Website Design and Usability evaluation: Comprehension and Information Scent in Performing by Exploration. In: HCI, Las Vegas (2005)Google Scholar
- 6.Longo, L., Barrett, S., Dondio, P.: Toward Social Search: from Explicit to Implicit Collaboration to Predict Users’ Interests. In: WEBIST 2009 (2009)Google Scholar
- 7.Kelly, D., et al.: Reading Time, Scrolling and Interaction: exploring Implicit Sources of User Preferences for Relevance Feedback During Interactive Information Retrieval. In: SIGIR 2001, New Orleans, USA (2001)Google Scholar
- 8.Agichtein, E., Brill, E., Dumais, S.: Improving Web Search Ranking by Incorporating User Behavior Information. In: SIGIR 2006, Seattle, USA (2006)Google Scholar
- 9.Agichtein, E., Zheng, Z.: Identifying Best Bet Web Search Results by Mining Past User Behavior. In: Kdd 2006, Philadelphia, Pennsylvaia, USA (2006)Google Scholar
- 10.Atterer, R., et al.: Knowing the User’s Every Move - User Activity Tracking for Website Usability Evaluation and Implicit Interaction. In: WWW 2006, Edinburgh, May 23-26 (2006)Google Scholar
- 11.Velayathan, G., Yamada, S.: Behavior-based Web Page Evaluation. In: WWW 2007, Banff, Alberta, Canada, May 8-12 (2007)Google Scholar
- 12.Morita, M., Shinoda, Y.: Information Filtering Based on User Behavior analysis and Best Match Text Retrieval. In: 17th ACM SIGIR (1996)Google Scholar
- 13.Longo, L., Dondio, P., Barrett, S.: Temporal Factors to evaluate trustworthiness of virtual identities. In: IEEE, SECURECOMM 2007, France (2007)Google Scholar